Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Castro allow US occupation of his island?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:05 AM
Original message
Why does Castro allow US occupation of his island?
What on earth are Americans doing at Guantanamo anyway? Why hasn't Castro kicked them the hell out of Cuba by now? Any other country would find this state of affairs intolerable. Do you think the US would stand for it if we opened a Canadian Armed Forces base just outside Seattle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. 99 year Lease that Castro respects
That was signed before he was in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. When does it run out? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's not 99 years
It's perpetual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The lease is actually perpetual
Both sides have to agree to withdraw before it becomes null.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Unlike, say, the ABM treaty with the Russians,
which was unilaterally abrogated by the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I understand your point.
And the treaty on its face probably isn't valid under the Geneva Conventions.

I was just replying to the poster that incorrectly stated it was a 99 year lease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. The ABM treaty contained a provision for unilateral withdrawal with
advance notification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. It is a perpetual lease signed in 1903 that must be terminated by both
parties. We pay Cuba $4000+ a year for the 45 square miles. Castro asked for the return of Gitmo in 1959, we refused. Castro does not cash the checks as a protest. He has over 40 of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Anything stopping him from raising the rent?
You know, to $100,000,000 per annum or something like that? Or is it rent-controlled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The lease has to end
and it's perpetual...:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I heard it was rent controlled, but since Castro wants the land
back, it would look strange for him to want more money that he does not cash.

The orginal amount was in gold coins, but after the depression was the gold was converted to cash. That is the only increase that I know of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I would get a US lawyer to make the argument that they owe the
ammount now equal to the gold coins of 1903....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. The first 40-odd cheques would be stale-dated by now anyway.
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 05:59 AM by IntravenousDemilo
But if he did up the rent to $100,000,000, I'd hope he would cash that one for the benefit of Cubans.

Of course, it might come back NSF, in which case an eviction notice would be in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I google to make sure about the rent. Problem is, Castro cashed
the first check, which the US says, is acceptance of the lease agreement.

He uses them to show foreign dignitaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
2.  Gitmo Bay
is under a 1905 lease to the USA (Platt Ammendment). A 1934 treaty confirmed the lease.

Castro to date has only ever cashed 1 of America's lease payments.

Cubans are very unhappy with US being at Gitmo but... hey, the Japanese and the S Koreans want us the hell out of their countries for years now too, and we're still there.

And for the rightwingnut morans;

The UN is not on US territory, even tho it's in New York. The land the UN sits on is NOT US territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Don't forget Germany. WW II has been over for 60 years.



And yet if you look at a map of Germany with US installations indicated we still cover Germany like a bad rash.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. A thought
It would take force that he doesn't possess. Attacking Guantanamo would be a ready-made reason to start up the assassination game again and he knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. umm no
Attacking Gitmo would be a cause for war not assasination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Remember day one of this war?
How did it start? :P

Castro would be lucky to see the end of the war is what I meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Speaking as a Navy Vet who has been to Gitmo several times, I
think it's a waste of money and needs to be shut down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is the sole reason:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Seriously, Castro and what army is going to evict the US?
Castro respects Gitmo because he doesnt have a choice in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Probably part of Cuban Missile Crisis deal.
Russia pulled the missiles out, Cuba will never be invaded by the US, and the US gets to keep the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_true_leroy Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. some governments still respect international treaties...
how quaint, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC