Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do you argue against the RW talking point that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 01:58 PM
Original message
How do you argue against the RW talking point that
* has placed more minorities in high offices than any previous president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. One day they will be judged on the content of their character...
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 02:00 PM by rfranklin
and not the color of their skin. (Thasnk you to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)

A brown, yellow or red crook is no better than a white crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. good one
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brucefan Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. He does it
so he dosen't have to respond to stupid talking points like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know how true that is, but the fact that the Republicans have
rejected more minorities and women from high office than the Democrats, may have something to do with the final results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would ask them to name them off.
Okay, Condi and Colin. So he had two African Americans in high office. He got a twofer with Condi being a woman. That is two more than anyone else, true, but I don't see a big African American, or Latino, or Asian American, or female presence through his administration. It's mostly white and male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. it's actually not bad
Bush has shown an ability to find incompetent people across race & gender:

Elaine Chao, Chinese-American woman as Sec. of Labor
Margaret Spellings, Sec. of Education, female
Rod Paige, previous Sec. of Education, African American
Al Gonzalez, Atty General, Latin-American

However, as I think somebody else pointed out, none of them are poor or even close to middle class, and that they'll eventually be judged on the content of their character & not the color of their skin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. LOL. You made a good point.
He's named the most incompetent people to high administrative posts than any previous President in history. That's the best comeback yet.
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is a one-word answer
Tokenism.

All those women and minorities Bush has in "powerful" positions are mere tokens to mask the rampant discrimination the regime practices against the female and minority masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd say a minority crook is as complicit as a non-minority crook.
Numbers mean nothing. Condi is as black as bush* when it comes to actually being an Afican American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. The masta' always liked to put his favorites in the
kitchen and the household. They were still slaves.

---
That's a little over the top, but it's what popped in my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's what Harry Belefonte said, sort of.
He said that Condi and Colin like to be in Massa's house because it's warm there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
turbo_satan Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. I argue that Bush isn't racist. Rather, he's classist.
I don't believe that Bush has any problem whatsoever with skin color. I *do* believe, however, that he cares very much that all of his appointess have to have the same class ideology -- that neither government nor the wealthy have any responsibility for the care, support, or well-being of the less-fortunate among us. As long as they're of the "corporations uber alles" mind-set, they'll have a place in the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. It proves nothing.
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 02:15 PM by bluedawg12
Because the rest of the under class, to include black Americans did not appear on the RW radar as a social issue at all.

That is because the neocommrades dropped social activism after they were involved with the civil rights movement and then dumped Johnson over Nam- they became right wing scolds, and started attacking human rights movements and making fun of the women's movement, gay rights, environmentalists, they decided that these "soft" social issues would not bring them their goal: world dominance.

Condy, and Powel are where they are because Democrats and liberal fought for fairness in the work place and affirmative action in education not because of anything that Trixon, shrub senior, or fumblingFord, did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. wow great response
I like it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. For every one he's placed in office, he's put THOUSANDS on Unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I would say.......
....it's not about minorities, it's about their religion!!

And really, a person's religious beliefs should not be a prerequisite for holding a govt position. Neither should minority status. It should be based on merit and whether or not their professional background qualifies them for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. How bout that he let the minorities in NOLA die because they were poor?
This could lead into a way for you to talk about Bush being an elitist, corporate bandit. Maybe hammer in the rich vs. poor or 'ownership' society stuff into their heads. Remind them how poor they are as compared to Cheney or Boosh.

If they bring up RW talking points about NOLA, ask them why it only took Boosh 2 days to get aid to Pakistan, but 5 days to get aid to fellow Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. SO WHAT?
He has started world war III.

Is that an even trade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. LOL
That is brilliant :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. only 2% of blacks approve of bush
what else do you need to know ???


source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/10/13/BL2005101300885.html

In what may turn out to be one of the biggest free-falls in the history of presidential polling, President Bush's job-approval rating among African Americans has dropped to 2 percent, according to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. <skip>

But Bush's bungled response to Hurricane Katrina -- seen by many blacks as evidence that he didn't care about them (see my September 13 column ) -- may have brought support for the president in the African American community down to nearly negligible levels.

Tim Russert called attention to this startling statistic on the NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams yesterday: "Brian, listen to this," he said. "Only 2 percent -- 2 percent! -- of African-Americans approve of George Bush's handling of the presidency -- the lowest we have ever seen in that particular measure."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I started the discussion with this point - about this poll
and the RWer responded with 'bush put more minorities in high office than any other prez'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yes, he has to because Republicans won't ELECT black people...
It's a perfect public relations solution. Appoint them to positions where they have no real power because they only follow orders. And if they get out of line, fire 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Like Armstrong Williams
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. symbolism versus substance
placing blacks in high office to give them power and the opportunity to serve as role models should be acknowledged as a positive contribution ... those on the left can accept that point without losing the greater argument ...

HOWEVER, the true test of a president's commitment to civil rights and equality of the races must, more importantly, extend well beyond mere symbolism ... and the measure of bush's commitment to black America is made by speaking directly to black Americans ...

and here, a 2% rating is the lowest in American history ... tokenism and symbolism is all well and good but, in the end, it's substance that really counts ... and this president can't seem to count past 2 ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. great response! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Right-wing doublespeak of the highest order.
For years, the right has ridiculed 'liberals' for "counting." They told us, only "liberals" notice the color of one's skin. So, I might reply:

+ I thought it was only "liberals" that noticed skin color.
+ I thought "conservatives" were only interested in performance. You know, the best person for the job?
+ I thought only "liberals" counted the numbers of minorities to prove their politically correct "numerical ideology."
* I thought only "liberals" touted "quotas."

It's just amazing how "conservatives" can argue completely opposite positions that both point to their total immersion in institutional racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Upper class RW members of minorities
Hey, I'm white and I probably know more about the struggles of the minorities than the Bush Administration does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. who have their policies and actions helped? It is admirable that he
does it, but far outweighed by the policies they implement.

There's nothing wrong with giving him his props where due, but minorities in the Bush White House have more in common with the Jewish kapos in concentrations--they just keep the nazis from dirtying their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. So what? They are just stooges...he doesn't hire minorities for regular
jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Who gives a shit?
People should be judged by their actions, not the color of their frickin' skin, and George Bush's "minorities" are responsible for much of the damage his administration has caused. I wouldn't care if Condi Rice was pink with purple fucking polka dots--I'd still think she was a liar and a cheat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. has W appointed any Jews?? Jews Clinton appointed were listed on a
probably antisemitic site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Condi is only black on the outside. Gonzalez is only brown on the outside
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 05:10 PM by goodboy
Cho is only yellow on the outside.

These people have, through their actions and associations sold their own people down the river.

They are traitors to their races, otherwise they wouldn`t be REPUKES in the first place.

The ``minorities`` Bush* appointed are the equivalent of a Jewish Nazi.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. tell him to tell it to the 98% of blacks that disapprove of Bush
maybe they don't know your friend's fascinating fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Upper class silverspoon 'minorities' hardly constitute the minorities
that those of us living in the real world are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. So minorities have achieved parity in whoredom and corruption?? Not
something to brag about.
That's what I'd say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC