Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Important Intelligence Question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 11:32 AM
Original message
Important Intelligence Question
An argument can be made that it was a CIA intelligence failure that led to the SOTU quote regarding a possibly bogus uranium transaction between Niger and Iraq.

The failure quite possibly occured because the CIA has so few (if any) agents involved with the continent of Africa, while the continent, with many Muslim countries, dictatorships and rogue nations represents a very credible threat to the national security of the United States.

House Intelligence Chairman Porter Goss, R-Fla.:

"...our coverage in the continent of Africa is abysmal because we made a decision to pull out our assets in Africa. It was also compounded by the scrub that was done during the . . . John Deutch DCI-ship, the scrub of assets. We basically denuded ourself of capability in the Hum-Int (Human Intelligence) world and we're paying for that. There was nothing sinister about it. That was the judgment of the day. We were a nation at peace and prosperity and that was what society said was OK to do. We did it. We did it at our peril."

My question: Should the U.S. strengthen, increase and expand the CIA in general- and focus on Africa with new resources in particular?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Come on you guys!
I know this question is not the typical "let's get him!" post, but I think this is real and serious. At least serious enough to ponder here.

"Bush Lied and People Died," is a great quote, but there is always more to a story than a catchy soundbite.

Porter Goss believes that other "mischief" is brewing in Africa, above and beyond the alleged (and possibly false) attempt to transfer uranium. Beyond politics, beyond the desire to nail Bush to the wall, is there smoke here, or just smoke and mirrors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:09 PM
Original message
.
Edited on Wed Jul-16-03 12:11 PM by Hanuman
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry about the slag posts...
Edited on Wed Jul-16-03 12:15 PM by Hanuman
I'm really getting burned by the new software, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirshack Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. IWell...
I'm not sure it's just increasing numbers and strength....there are probably plenty of agents involved with Africa, the Middle East, Asia, etc etc etc that rarely, if ever, set foot in those areas, instead relying on satellites, informants, and other stuff like that.

Frankly, I really don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Goss specifically mentioned Human Intelligence...
And I interpret that to mean spooks on the ground, in country, as well as informants and double agents. In this area there may be virtually no capacity at all.

To me I find that a bit concerning. Admitedly, I don't know HOW concerned I SHOULD be about this. But, I can see this as another possible explanation or addendum to the mistake in the SOTU address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. The argument can NOT be made
There was no CIA intelligence failure. They knew Niger hadn't sent any uranimu to Iraq, and they told the WH so. The intelligence failure was between Cheney, Rice, Bush, and Rumsfeld, who couldn't come up with half a brain between them.

This "Africa intelligence defecit" is another right wing smear on Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanuman Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-03 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So you are satisfied with intelligence "as is..."
and would not enhance it at all?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC