Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzalez, 9/29/03, Fitzgerald, WH DESTROYING EVIDENCE& Indictments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Chicago1 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:28 PM
Original message
Gonzalez, 9/29/03, Fitzgerald, WH DESTROYING EVIDENCE& Indictments
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 12:34 PM by Chicago1
Dear All,

Wayne Madsen (I know, I know) has posted information on Fitzgerald, Gonzalez, and the WH DESTROYING EVIDENCE.


http://www.waynemadsenreport.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Corrected Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I had forgotten this one.
snip

Then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales informed White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card at 8:00 pm on September 29, 2003 that the Justice Department was beginning a criminal investigation of the White House over the CIA leak. Gonzales did not order the White House staff to preserve all documents, email, and memos until the next day, giving the White House a full twelve hours to destroy any incriminating documents, including email. Gonzales later claimed he delayed his order because of the late hour on September 29 -- however, the White House and its operations staff works on a 24x7 basis.

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wilms, good call ... the 12 hour sanitization notice
That is an important fact that got mentioned and left by MSM without so much as a blast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And everyone who parties gets to testify about it under oath -
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 01:09 PM by leveymg
why do you think they send out letters? It's an invitation to destroy evidence and obstruct justice. That allows the prosecutor to call every secretary in the building to testify about what the boss did after the letter was received.

You think US Attorneys are idiots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course they destroyed evidence.
They just missed a few bits, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC