Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sears and Penney's Catalogs and the underwear section.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:24 AM
Original message
Poll question: Sears and Penney's Catalogs and the underwear section.
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 12:53 AM by Maddy McCall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I seem to remember a JC Penney catalogue where something was...
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 12:31 AM by Digit
peeking out....

Hint...it was boxer shorts and was a big hit with us high school women.
...way back when I WAS in high school...
:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I remember that!
Also, you could see nipples through the see-through bras. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. PERV! LOL
Damn, wish I still had that edition. It would be fun on ebay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njdemocrat106 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Actually, I think it was a Sears catalog circa 1975
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 01:13 AM by njdemocrat106
I remember seeing something like this on snopes.com.

Edit: OK, I found a link regarding this:

http://www.snopes.com/business/hidden/sears.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. HA! I remembered the penis, but not the place!
That was a nice blast from the past seeing that.
I could hardly believe my eyes that I should see it on the web!

I will have to bookmark that one!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. That was my excuse in the eighties.
Amoral slut that I am. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. OMG! Old lady that I am, I have seen a dong or two in my day as well....
My lips are sealed...NOW...

But I am laughing my ass off right now listening to that song!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. I remember that!
But I think it was briefs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qibing Zero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was not normal
I never really understood the whole underwear thing. Perhaps if I were in the 50s or something and was so repressed I didn't know what the nude bodies looked like. :shrug:

My imagination was much better anyhow. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. So I guess asking you about National Geographic is pointless.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
43. It was the fact in this instance that Sears overlooked something...
That was what was funny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. hahahaaa! that was very logical! I get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. then, again, this could be the reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. well I think perhaps men's undies may be a bit more attractive now
seems like back then it was either tightie-whities up to the waist or big-ass boxers :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Chicks dig me.....
because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. OK Gabi I have to ask this
do chicks actually TELL you this LOL :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. do I have to be honest about this?
If I do, I'd have to ask you to watch a certain Bill Murray movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. well, I like Bill Murray
:D

In all seriousness though, if a man is sporting undies, I think the value of a really good-fitting, nice-looking pair of skivvies cannot be underestimated. YES INDEED !!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Do you have the chicken-head G-string from Spencer's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. LOL
*choke* JEEZ it's not like the Subject did not WARN me :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Women's undies are better now also.
Old catalogs had stuff like girdles and other awkward to deal with items now no longer seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. oh yes
I remember the pointy, unnatural looking bra structures - WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. We men wore long itchy underwear in winter. A turn-off for sure.
I have been liberated from them for decades. But to compensate I wish they had some kind of leg warmers for chaps like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm one of 3 girls;
we'd take turns with catalogues. One page was mine, one page was some other sister's. :eyes: We'd pick our favorite fashions and models. I do remember those catalogues, and not even the underwear!
Nice clothes, bodies, etc., were different that what we were used to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So am I! can you guess which one?
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 12:48 AM by Gabi Hayes
coincidence....or not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Gabi,
I don't even know, it doesn't matter, but I'm LMFAO!
When ya put it like that, what a choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. real knee slapper, hey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oh yes. We shopped for husbands in them.
As kids...we'd circle the man we wanted. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yes, I recall that also! This must have been our
entertainment, because there was not a lot of TV, no internet, whatever did we do?
I actually had a nice kidhood!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
36. So did I. We used our creative minds for fun...
And we played outside 90% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. You left one out.
When I was a kid, I was a sexual deviant. Wearing a soiled panty on my head, I would look through my mother's underwear drawer, comparing the silken jewels to the pictures in the Sears and Penny's catalogs. But today I am a normal republican. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:49 AM
Original message
LMFAO!!!
:rofl: I'm adding that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Too much! I'm happy your
mom had silken jewels! And may your sexual deviancy be dumbed down by your republicanism. Or not. I am at a loss....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. It was National Geographic magazines for me
True story, folks. Saw lots of nekid bodies in that magazine. Guess that makes me some kind of deviant. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. see, that mag made me sport a bra for life
I was traumatized by some of the breasts featured :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I remember thinking...don't let it be me...please!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. I kid you not. My mom, in the birds and bees convo, pulled out a...
Nat Geo and showed me breasts, and explained to me that I had to wear a bra or I'd look like that.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #30
42. so was i
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. Haha! The trusty old "Tribes of the Pacific" edition!
Those had to be every boy's favorite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. Slightly off topic, but if you have a late 70's catalog, take a look..
You'll laugh for hours. Start in the slacks department. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. question
would the EARLY seventies be any better?

I kid you not, I remember looking around at age 14 in 1971 thinking THESE PEOPLE LOOK RIDICULOUS and their grandchildren will laught their asses off at the pictures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. I've only seen a 1977 issue of the Sears catalog
Can't comment on the early 70's, but I'm willing to bet it wasn't as bad as '77. It was leisure suit heaven in 77!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. gawd, don't remind me
I've never been a fad person and it just appalls me what has appealed to people throughout my years :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. ROTFLMAO!!!
LOVE the last choice. :D :D :D :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
33. now I know
Why the S and R catalog always ended up in the outhouse.

It was not too long ago
I went tripping through the snow
Out to that house behind my old hound dog
Where I'd sit me down to rest
Like a snowbird on her nest
And read the Sears And Roebuck catalog.

Ode To The Little Brown Shack Out Back
Billy Edd Wheeler.
One of my very favorite people on earth. Google Billy Edd Wheeler. He is also responsible for Johnny Cash's The Reverend Mr. Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
38. When I was a kid
I was already a sexual deviant but the underwear section did not figure into my deviation so I ignored it.





:evilgrin:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
40. actually my neighbor had
"nudist magazines" so we would seek a peak when he was out of the room...hey it was the mid 50`s.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
47. i love you maddy mccall
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. I love you, too, Sundog.
:loveya: ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
49. as a kid I invented a game with my mother's old catalogs

we played store. my brother and I would cut out articles in the catalog for our 'store'.

underwear didn't strike us as anything but something to sell in our store. cutting out underwear, sex never entered our minds.

but that was way back when sexy was a word seldom used. like, nobody said 'oh sexy' when enthusing over something/anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC