3. We probably would've heard about it sooner, but for 'private contractors'
serving as bodyguards for commanders in Iraq. More like, commanders held captive by corporations. What high ranking official would not be able to pick out a bunch of trust worthy chaps from his command to be his security?
They would seem to be under guard. Wonder if private contractors are protecting commanders' families too.
Did I fall asleep and wake up in Gemrany circa 1939?
9. He's looking for any reason to use the military, there is no doubt about
that. The real question is why? Why is he hell bent on removing the safe guards that keep soldiers from policing civilians? I have always wanted to believe that Martial Law was not one of his aims, but I am having a tough time buying it anymore.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.