Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel says human rights group charge of using 'human shields' preposterous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:54 PM
Original message
Israel says human rights group charge of using 'human shields' preposterous
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1937599.stm

Thursday, 18 April, 2002, 14:24 GMT 15:24 UK
Israel accused of using 'human shields'

<snip>The Israeli army has dismissed the new report as preposterous, saying it has never used Palestinians as human shields.

But Human Rights Watch says the Israeli denial is inadequate, noting that its repeated requests for the Israeli army to give its testimony for the report have been turned down.

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2005-10-06T104801Z_01_MCC638850_RTRUKOC_0_UK-MIDEAST-SHIELDS.xml&archived=False

Israeli high court bans use of 'human shields'
Thu Oct 6, 2005 11:48 AM BST
Printer Friendly | Email Article | RSS

By Tali Caspi

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel's army must stop using Palestinian civilians as "human shields" in operations against suspected Palestinian militants, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

Palestinian and Israeli human-rights watchdog groups had sought the ruling. The court's decision that the practice is illegal under international law hardened a temporary injunction issued in 2002.

"The army has no right to use civilians as human shields ... It is cruel and barbaric," Supreme Court Justice Aharon Barak wrote in a 20-page judgement.

Israeli troops conducting raids against wanted militants have used Palestinian non-combatants to knock on doors or enter homes of suspects. In several cases, the practice resulted in injury or death of the human shields.

An army spokesman declined comment on the ruling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh, the hell, the ******
it will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC