Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Hastert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:49 PM
Original message
President Hastert
That's all I want for my birthday and Christmas combined!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Get rid of him and we have President Robert Byrd.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Uh, no
Think President Ted Stevens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I thought it was the most senior Senator.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. The most Senior Senator of the Majority Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Nope
The President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Senate equivalent of the Speaker of the House -- it's an "elected" position, not necessarily the person who has been there longest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. So after 2006 election it will be President Byrd.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Ouch...
How far do we have to go to get someone even moderately reasonable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. PORK for everybody.........
Yippee, woo-hoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Is that true?
Is Byrd fourth in line for the presidency? Why Byrd?

Anyone have that information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If the Dems controlled the Senate, he'd be the Senate President
And the Senate President is fourth in sucession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Dick Cheney is President of the Senate.
Ted Stevens is President pro tempore.

Also, Dennis Hastert will never be POTUS. As long as Hastert is Speaker of the House, that means that Republicans have control. As long as Republicans have control, Bush and Cheney will not be impeached. Ergo, no President Hastert.

Seriously, people who talk about a future "President Hastert" give the Republicans a lot more credit for integrity than I do....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Order of Presidential Succession
original post by "Stand and Fight" 10/03.
Order of Presidential Succession


The Vice President Richard Cheney
• Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
• President pro tempore of the Senate(1) Ted Stevens
• Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
• Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
• Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
• Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
• Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
• Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
• Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez(2)
• Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao(3)
• Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
• Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
• Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
• Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
• Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
• Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
• Secretary of Homeland Security(4) Michael Chertoff

(1) The president pro tempore presides over the Senate when the vice president is absent. By tradition the position is held by the senior member of the majority party.
(2) Carlos Gutierrez was born in Cuba and is ineligible.
(3) Elaine Chao was born in Taiwan and is ineligible.
(4) In late July 2005, the Senate passed a bill moving the Homeland Security secretary to number 8 on the list. The bill is awaiting House approval.

Source: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0101032.html




http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4958816&mesg_id=4958816
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. No way
:puke: :puke: He's no better than Bush/Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, it's damn hard to imagine he could be any worse than Chimpy...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Not hard to imagine at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Hastert is as mean or meaner...only good from him replacing
BUSH would be that BUSH is gone. And maybe Hastert will follow--seeing how all of them are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have heard many people here complain about him if he were
to become pres.
IMO: Can't be any worse than what we have now and a it would be with a mortally wounded repuke party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. yep,,, it would be a dead duck presidency
never mind lame duck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Sibel Edmonds gets a fair hearing, that won't happen, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Roger that!
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Won't happen
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 05:56 PM by OKNancy
even if Bush and Cheney are indicted. Here is what will happen
Cheney resigns first, Bush appoints ( could be anyone) Condi Rice as Vice President. Bush resigns, Condi takes over.

The succession is only in case of DEATH. ( the Constitution doesn't say death, it says can not serve, but history has proven that there is a way around it)

OTOH, anyone would be better that those two I guess. so you could still celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. The succession is NOT only in case of death.
The order of Presidential Succession applies in ANY vacancy - not just death.

(a)
(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President.
(2) The same rule shall apply in the case of the death, resignation, removal from office, or inability of an individual acting as President under this subsection.

(b) If, at the time when under subsection (a) of this section a Speaker is to begin the discharge of the powers and duties of the office of President, there is no Speaker, or the Speaker fails to qualify as Acting President, then the President pro tempore of the Senate shall, upon his resignation as President pro tempore and as Senator, act as President.
(c) An individual acting as President under subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this section shall continue to act until the expiration of the then current Presidential term, except that -

(1) if his discharge of the powers and duties of the office is founded in whole or in part on the failure of both the President-elect and the Vice-President-elect to qualify, then he shall act only until a President or Vice President qualifies; and
(2) if his discharge of the powers and duties of the office is founded in whole or in part on the inability of the President or Vice President, then he shall act only until the removal of the disability of one of such individuals.

(d)
(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is no President pro tempore to act as President under subsection (b) of this section, then the officer of the United States who is highest on the following list, and who is not under disability to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President shall act as President: Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(2) An individual acting as President under this subsection shall continue so to do until the expiration of the then current Presidential term, but not after a qualified and prior-entitled individual is able to act, except that the removal of the disability of an individual higher on the list contained in paragraph (1) of this subsection or the ability to qualify on the part of an individual higher on such list shall not terminate his service.
(3) The taking of the oath of office by an individual specified in the list in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be held to constitute his resignation from the office by virtue of the holding of which he qualifies to act as President.

(e)
(1) Subsections (a), (b), and (d) of this section shall apply only to such officers as are eligible to the office of President under the Constitution. Subsection (d) of this section shall apply only to officers appointed, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, prior to the time of the death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, of the President pro tempore, and only to officers not under impeachment by the House of Representatives at the time the powers and duties of the office of President devolve upon them.
(2) During the period that any individual acts as President under this section, his compensation shall be at the rate then provided by law in the case of the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. I know what you're saying, but..
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM by tridim
do you really want this guy as the President?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Not my first choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Not my first choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. It'd be far from perfect, but miles better than our current situation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. He is just a crooked as Delay and the rest of the repugs. I say we
must get rid of them all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. He is just as dirty as the rest of them...
..however, it will mean that the rethuglicans are done. A constitutional crisis the likes of which this country has never seen. There won't be a republican led ANYTHING for many, many moons...You won't be able to get elected as city rat-catcher if there's an (R) attached to your name....

If the indictments come down as many of us hope, the repignican party in its current mutation will be done...the religious nutjobs will again have no voice and be banished to the far edges of sanity and national conscience once more...

All of the things that have occurred in the last 5-6 years are as a direct result of the marriage of convenience between right-wing religious insanity, and insatiable corporate greed manifesting itself in the human form of Cokey McSmirk.

We must NEVER let this happen again, and the only way that Mr & Mrs Joe Six-pack are ever going to get it is if the whole lot of them are indicted and the putrid tub of lard from Illinois gets sworn in as interim president...Then, and ONLY then will they understand that the rethuglican party is rotten to its very core...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. But if this truely so and the Rethugs are going down...
Do you want to leave them in power like that? We could have a reverse "Seven Days In May" where they try to retain power through more unsavory and non-Demoratic means if they feel desperate and power-hungry enough. Many of them probably realize if they lose power that some folks might be doing some serious jail time, unless the Dems cut a deal to let them loose on pardons if they let go of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Don't forget Hastert will be a feckless, powerless pres.
Congress will be able to walk all over him. If 2006 goes well, which it likely will, Hastert will be an immense improvement over the one party power trip of the past five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. If 2006 goes well, we could have Pelosi instead of Hastert!
That's what I'd like to happen. Build up the evidence so that EVERYONE knows that something is wrong right before the elections. Get a landslide for the Dems to take over both the Senate and the House, and once Pelosi takes the reigns of the House, THEN get Bush and Cheney impeached (and anyone else would be good measure but not necessary). Then we could clean house on the executive side! If either of Bush's new appointees to SCOTUS do anything illegal to try and "protect" him, then impeach their asses too!

A lot of things to happen between now and then, but one can dream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. That would be optimum.
On the other hand, we should consider what happens if there's a meltdown where we have to move quickly. Things are going extraordinarily bad for Chimpy and his Repug allies. Things figure to get a lot worse before they get better. Such is the stuff of which incompetence is made. It really looks like a substantial number of Repug leaders will *all* be under indictment.

If the Repug CongressCritters start turning into real Republicans, we may have impeachment hearings before you can say, "It's hard work." In that case, we should just go ahead with them and take these guys out.

Putting it another way, if Congress impeaches Chimpy before 2007 Hastert and the Congressional Repugs will already be in big, big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. We also need to impeach Bush and Cheney as a "package" deal after 2006...
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 12:41 AM by calipendence
We don't want to give the Rethugs any wiggle room in appointing an "interim" VP that might be someone they can find that isn't "impeachable" (like Gerald Ford was) but will allow them to hold onto the reins of power. We want it to go to Nancy Pelosi when she becomes Speaker of the House.

I'm trying to remember the Watergate situation. Had Nixon been impeached instead of resigned, could Ford have replaced him, or would it have gone to Speaker of the House then? I'm wondering if part of his "deal" was that he was allowed to appoint a successor to Agnew (and therefore himself) instead. That's the last thing we want. We need to find a way to get Pelosi in after the election after the Dems win the House and let her "clean house"! Hope we also get Arnold replaced then, so that someone like Angelides can pick a Dem to replace Pelosi with if she moves up to the pres slot too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's Cheney, Hastert, Stevens, Condi, John Snow,Rumsfeld,Gonzales
I think our best bets would be Hastert. We don't want anypne who can turn around and run for Prez. They'd get a head start.


The Vice President Richard Cheney
Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
President pro tempore of the Senate1 Ted Stevens
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez2
Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao3
Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
Secretary of Homeland Security4 Michael Chertoff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. Screw that! Win back the House, THEN IMPEACH CHENEY AND BUSH!!!!
Can you say President Pelosi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. hmmm...that sounds more like it!
The first woman president!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. I look forward to his swearing-in.
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 10:33 PM by Independent_Liberal
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. And we won't have to listen to any more c--p about "mandates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC