Was Miller's source herself?

[FreedomAngel82]

Rhandi mentioned how Miller is probably the source of herself. Do you think that's possible? I read the history of Miller on another blog. Was she involved with the Iraq war group?

[shraby]

1. Justin Raimondo has an interesting take on

the whole thing at
<http://antiwar.com/justin/>

He seems to think that Miller was the "go to" reporter for publishing stolen documents in the Franklin espionage case. They used the same modus operandi as the Plame leakers.

[H2O Man]

2. Right.

It's not that she is her own source. It's that she wears several hats.

[shraby]

3. I read him regularly and he seems to have

a good handle on what's taken place. Miller may be implicated in both cases before this is all over. Like my sig line..there are questions to be answered and answers to be questioned.

[Kolesar]

4. Wow. That was quite a column

Although I found my head swimming with the recitation of the names once AIPAC got involved/was mentioned. You can say I am a little eager for Fitz to start bringing charges.

[Me.]

5. Don't Forget

Her warning the so called Islamic charity that the FBI was on the way.

[jazzjunkysue]

6. She's not CIA, or in the cabinet, so, someone told her about Plame.

If she's not a B** appointee, and a real employee of the white house, then someone had to tell her about plame. Even if it's common knowledge, and she told Novak, neither one of them should habe printed it, even if they had proof it was true.

That's why I don't understand why Novak walked on this. Maybe he won't. But regardless of who told Novak, Novak and the paper printed it. Why are they getting away with that? It's not news. It's a personal attack, meant to do significant personal harm.