Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whew! Did Harry Reid just put the kiss of death on the Miers nomination?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:54 PM
Original message
Whew! Did Harry Reid just put the kiss of death on the Miers nomination?
While taking the wind out of the right-wing meme that we Dems will torpedo anybody Bush nominates because we hate Bush, Reid's comments about Miers (or at least the part I caught) were vague, general, and damned her with faint praise.

I mean "I haven't know her very long, but I've found her to be personable and genuine" is just not much of a recommendation for a Supreme Court candidate.

By that standard my husband, our houseguest from New Orleans, and each and every one of our Golden Retrievers would also be good candidates. :)

Meanwhile, having Reid introduce and endorse her so quickly will have freeper heads exploding all over the country.

Keep in mind that Reid's strong suit as Whip and Senate Democratic Leader was always said to be his skill at strategy.

I just couldn't help but remember this as I watched his almost comically weak endorsement of Miers.

Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I had the same thought and posted a reply to a thread on Reid
glad I'm not the only one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can't imagine any other explanation for such a swift, yet puny,
endorsement.

And Reid *is* very canny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
70. Tough, too.
Did you hear him on Al Franken's show last week?

wildflower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. also, she's never killed anyone
and she's never been in the KKK or Neo-Nazis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. ...that we know of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. and she's good at returning her phone calls...
glowing endorsement, that. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
67. yeah, I caught that
I thought Wow! If that doesn't qualify her....

Good goin' Harry, now the wingers hate her even more. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:58 PM
Original message
I LOL when he said "well, she returns her phone calls quickly"
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 12:59 PM by cry baby
I knew then that he was just stirring the right wing pot. He also mentioned that she contributed to the Gore campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. People seem to like me because I am polite and I am rarely late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. someone else posted that in a thread on winger reaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:13 PM
Original message
I'm sure wingers are, to say the least, perplexed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
72. No, did he really say that!?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rope-a-dope/finesse is lost on many here. I'm glad to see others
recognize a masterful move.

We're all qualified to be SCOTUS. Reid just complemented the entire nation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. It is a display of 'rope-a-dope' at its finest. I've already had ...
... people walk into my office and call me on the phone and say the same thing -- 'gosh, i'm qualified to be a SC judge ...'

And, that is exactly what Senator Reid essentially just said to the entire Nation ....

Good to know that if you're nice and haven't mooned the pope or pooped in someone's salad or killed your grandmother you, too, can be a SC justice :evilgrin:


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. when you do rope a dope, aren't you supposed to throw at least one punch?
The Democrats are like a boxer with his eyes swollen shut, six broken ribs, thirty teeth knocked out and a punctured lung saying, "A little longer, and I'll have him right where I want him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. "when you do rope a dope, aren't you supposed to throw at least one punch?
Nope, because then you'd give away your game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. ah, you bite the other guys ankle while your on the floor...
or you make him look unsympathetic when they are wheeling you away to the morgue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Um, we're down 55-45 in the Senate.
We were already being wheeled to the morgue.

Reid's strategy is probably the most effective thing we can do at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
64. at some point, you have to clue the public in on what you stand for
if anything.

I think on this one, you may be right, but superficially it looks a lot like the Dems tendency to roll over and play dead.

When I heard Reid and Schumer's comments on the radio, I was crestfallen. All I could think was, "These dickless fucks are betraying us AGAIN."

You've got to take some public stands if you want people to vote FOR you, not just against the corrupt, incompetent, and cruel loads in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #53
101. what will this strategy accomplish?
Will it stop her from getting on the bench?

No will it show voters what Senate Democrats stand for?

Or is the only thing they are worried about is right wing talk radio calling them obstructionist?

Who is this "strategy" supposed to impress?

You and the other cheerleaders for this roll over strategy have yet to say what it will accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
88. Senator Reid did just that. To mix the metaphor, Bush gave a swat ..
... to the fundie/freeper hornet's nest, and Senator Reid, from a safe distance, then threw a rock at it, this morning....

I think he realizes the enormous potential of having precisely a deep insider to all-things evil in the Bush neoconster regime - and Miers is about as deep an insider as you can find - in open, televised to the public, hearings -- Plame, TANG, preemptive war, ... lots and lots to press in questioning her. Let her squirm, let her proclaim 'attorney client privilege,' let her spin, ....

If the Dems on that committee do their job robustly, given that by the time they're quizzing her Fitzgerald and the GJ may well be in full indictment phase, it could be an amazing expose for an American public that already has a very low regard for Bush and his neoconster thugs.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #88
99. Oh, you're giving credit I don't think the Senate Dems deserve...
If the Dems on that committee do their job robustly,

That's a rather big if, especially considering the lackluster ability of my Senator, one Ken Salazar.

Not to mention they need to stop talking when they ask questions and just ask the friggin' question. They waste time blathering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
77. Darn, then I'm out.
"Good to know that if you're nice and haven't mooned the pope or pooped in someone's salad or killed your grandmother you, too, can be a SC justice "

Well, that means I'm out. Too bad, the black robes make me look thinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
63. OK, so what, exactly, is the rope-a-dope / masterful move?
Because you're right - it's most definitely lost on me.

The Dem Leader just essentially guaranteed her passage with those comments, barring one hell of a smoking gun... which means mediocrity on the Bench, at best - and another possible stealth wingnut, at worst.

And call me cynical, but I can't believe that Little Boots has known her all these years and doesn't have a strong sense of her judicial views, although I do wonder if she wasn't named out of a more short-sighted concern about upcoming legal troubles for the WH - just a replacement member in the Scalia 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #63
84. He Guaranteed Nothing....Ever Played Chess?
This is just the opening move or SALVO. Of course Bush knows what she is all about...do you not think Reid hasn't studied this?

I would love to play poker with you. Fish in a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Yup, and I never sacrifice my queen as an opening move. So, the
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 02:51 PM by comsymp
question stands. What's this grand master plan?

The MINORITY LEADER has just stated that she seems okay to him.

This ill-advised comment has just kneecapped any other Dem who voices objections *or concerns* without being damn skippy sure he has the facts to back 'em up.

The Talking Heads can now bring said Dems on their shows and (while controlling the time / editing) say, "OK, Senator - your leader says she's fine - what's your problem?"

Every R (and R apologist) can do the same thing - on the radio, on the Senate floor, anywhere everywhere they go.

She will go through the confirmation hearings without having to answer a single question (precedent established) and on to the Floor.

Where's the "gotcha"?


/love poker. bring money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. Did You Check The Qualifiers?
His words are a bit different from a chess move. That is an absolute. He said what he did but now we have a new ball game because we can talk about the particulars/ qualifiers. And we can talk about them because Bush and his poll numbers are in the shitter.

Prior to this NO ONE could fucking question the fucking little Hitler now we can. Reid is jumping on this opportunity. This guy has been taking shit on for the last year and a half do you think he is really going to take his dick out and stomp on it?

He sees a window of opportunity and he is going to fucking make them pay for their stupidity. If you love poker you would know that NOW is the time to fucking kick your God Damn enemy and take all of his cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. And what do you base ANY of this on?
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 03:40 PM by comsymp
His words are, unfortunately an absolute, as well... or will be spun as such. He's the friggin' DEM LEADER. The DEM LEADER just said that Miers seems OK to him. Barring something truly horrendous coming to light, his comments have just taken the filibuster off the table and put pressure on the few Dems who can usually be counted on to challenge the Maladministration.

Yes, Little Boots' numbers *do* make him more vulnerable than he has ever been. Problem is, though, that it doesn't matter. It has been established that the POTUS can nominate whoever the hell he wants and, barring a spectacularly unpleasant development (dead girl, live boy... or vice versa - although in this case a live girl might actually work to his advantage), he is *entitled* to his pick.

The worst that can happen to the bushies is that they may take a few punches. In the short term, RWNs may be a little torqued, but Miers will be seated. For life.

There have been numerous comments similar to your statement that Reid is going to make 'em pay, but I still haven't heard how you think he's going to do it.

One last thing - as for your last sentence above - "NOW is the time..." - sounds great... as long as you have a damn good hand to play, yourself, because the R's are accustomed to calling the D's bluffs.


edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NancyG Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
85. But wouldn't she have to recuse herself
if something involving * himself came before the SC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. No, not HAVE to...
Any more than Scalia or Thomas had to recuse during Bush v Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
66. Good point. And Reid WAS a boxer.
:hi:

Reid is also quite a strategist, and certainly NOT a Republican dishrag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
68. I hope he knows what he's doing
I think the biggest slam publically is she donated money to Gore. This makes me wonder though why Bush nominated her. I'm so confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Congratulations for "getting it".
Unlike some of the other ship-jumpers. Your post is appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thanks tx_dem!
I'm a TX Dem, too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. She disposes of her nail trimmings hygienically as well nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. She even trims her toe nails too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatmanSD Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bible thumper
Miers is a fucking bible thumper, she believe in the bible word for word as the literal word of god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Citations? Linky-poo? Welcome to DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can we nominate you Golden Retrievers? I think the dogs would do a
wonderful job as SCJ. At this point, I'd vote for a dog over any candidates for political office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Heck yeah!
Well, all except Rascal. He's just silly.

And Poppy. At 14, she's a little deaf and would be a lot like having Emily Latela on the court. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. Dogs not qualified to hold public office
too much understanding of the word "loyalty"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. recommended
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thank Yew!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm thrilled with his choice, and want the freepers who are lurking
to know that.

Couldn't have picked a finer person, certainly fits in with our agenda over here at DU. Fine fine woman. Heard she gave generous donations to Gore's campaign, and maybe a few other dems as well. And rumor has it that she might be gay, so that looks promising. Yes, very good choice. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Yes, and I am happy our glorious leader is going to nuke Iran
instead of killing the people one at a time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. That's the spirit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. let's really pull one over on Bush and jump in the oven BEFORE he shoves
us in.

We can call ourselves the Brick Oven Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's exactly....
...what I said over at the thread where they are raking him over the coals.

They will go through the whole process before they vote. But...in the meantime...for dems to look pleased with her is the freepers worst nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
73. Rhandi Rhodes made a good point about this
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 02:24 PM by FreedomAngel82
The reason why Bush is nominating someone now is to take the focus off of Valerie Wilson, Bill Frist, Tom DeLay, Abrahm and all the rest of the cronyism. Rhodes is playing a clip of Scotty talking about this judge and when he speaks about her "credentials" it's like he's having such a hard time talking about it (like he's choking or something). Very weird.
Especially when he talked about women. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks Jane
It's good to see another DUer with their thinking cap on instead of their feeling one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Blush.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Reid understands that a big plus for any nominee is "dems hate her"
bush's base, after all, is a) right wing chrisitians and 2) haters and selfish people who would rather send the country down the tubes than be on the same side as the dems/libs/gays/atheists/easterners/elites/you name it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Senator Reid never disappoints.
This is one hell of a game of Rope-A-Dope -- just go over to FR and read as their heads are exploding. Fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good point, but a minor nitpick
I believe the word is "strategery".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. I came "this close" to writing it that way. :)
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes, it's all strategy and I think Reid is doing a great job playing...
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:16 PM by jim3775
...the game. Some people here are overly-emotional (and they cartainly have a right to be) but they don't see the forest for the trees.

The fact the Reid is tacitly supporting her will make the radical right go into meltdown and spring into action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. And it's already working too. "Conservative" groups are pissed.
Give 'em hell Harry.

www.giveemhellharry.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. they weren't happy about her before according to David Frum
he wrote criticizing her as a candidate before Bush picked her.

You could actually sell the crony angle to the right--Bush is putting cronyism and covering his ass ahead of even their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. I know what you mean...
If I was Harry Reid I'd be dancing for joy....the incompetent pResident who is currently under fire for picking unqualifed cronies for important jobs picked an unqualified crony for an important job...and about the only thing she's done in her career is help the corrupt drunk cover up a bunch of his scandals in the past.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. :)
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:19 PM by helderheid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. subtlty of this level is lost on most people and therefore is ineffective
She will be confirmed pretty much no matter what.

The Democrats would be better served by taking a clear stand against this kind of cronyism and ass-covering by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. and what's to stop them from doing that at the hearings?
this was a great initial salvo. Go, Reid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I hope you are right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Reverse Psychology? Why didn't we think of that before???!!
Why...

I think Miers will make a GREAT Supreme Court Justice!

I count on her to uphold the legality of Roe v Wade, just like Roberts promised he would!

Liberals ought to welcome her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
75. Maybe Reid is trying to show
what Rhandi is talking about. How anyone who is a loyalist to Bush and who you know gets you a job instead of actual qualifications. Maybe this will wake people up about Bush and how he is doing. :shrug: It could be very well reverse psychology. And I think Reid mentioned about her donating to Gore is interesting since she was his (Bush) personal lawyer. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. I hope you're all right, and I'm wrong. Honestly.
But to me this just looks like another BS deal from our "leadership".

She'll be sitting on the supreme court, and Reid will be the minority leader that endorsed her.

And once again, we'll be left with another hollow "victory", where the American people lose.

Sorry if I can't seem to find the cause to celebrate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. And you think slamming her would have done - - what?
In point of fact, his weak, weak, weak praise of her did slam her - - but without laying him open to those very effective Republican TV ads that say we Dems are just obstructionists?

This is the only effective thing he could have done, and he is brave for going ahead and doing it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Silence is golden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yes!! He brilliantly rolled over and kissed Bush's ass.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:25 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
What a devastating blow! Right up there with Chamberlain's equally brilliant reliance on "smart politics" at Munich.

Score another great Victory for the DLC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Well, it might have made you and me feel better if Reid had blasted her,
but I'm so old now, I can admire good strateg(er)y over being thrilled at someone's words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. And, the "strategy" is to put her in her seat on SCOTUS.
And, yes, it would have made me feel good to see the "leader" of the "opposition" party actually oppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. You're not alone. I see strategery, but no strategy.
She'll be on the SCOTUS, and Reid will be the democrat that praised her nomiation.

Anyone remember what happened to Tom Dashcle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. I just think "feeling good" at the expense of actually trying to affect
the course of this nomination isn't a very good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. But that's just it - he DID affect the course of the nomination
He just gave her his blessing, weakly worded or not. Barring a MAJOR development, she's in. As I said upthread, mediocre at best, a stealth wingnut at worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #47
78. I'm willing to wait and see what happens
Then I'd be disappointed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. One thing for Bush, he has a stellar record on appointing gays
they're just all in the closet like Mehlman, Karl, Scottie...

and now Melting Harriet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. Do you know enough about Harriet to say definitively she is a lesbian?
Where are your sources?

What does "Melting" mean?

Please explain...

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
76. I'm kidding. I only slept with her once, and I'm a guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. Clinton did something similar with Baby Bush at opening of his library
He praised Bush first for phone solicitor do not call list, no child left behind, the bullhorn after 9/11--and that was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
79. The call list is a joke though and so is NCLB
Not long ago my local news did an investigation on the no call list and found out that companies actually sell the list to other companies and that's how they get your number. Your better off just ignoring the calls and getting a caller ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #79
96.  I just liked the damning with very faint praise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. Hoo Haa!! He called her a Trial Lawyer!
I just saw another part of Reid's statement.

He called her a trial lawyer, not once, but twice, and said that's what he is.

"Trial Lawyer" is a hot-button term for right-wingers, and not in a good way.

Dog, that's funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. that is a good one. It's too bad he didn't say it's time for a lesbian on
the Supreme Court.

"Let me just say, we are gratified to see President Bush nominate a pro-choice, anti-war goddess-worshipping, evolution-believing lesbian who owns three Che tee shirts and gave her mom Fahrenheit 9/11 on DVD for Christmas."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. But you see, it's important that he be accurate.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:47 PM by janeaustin
She *is* a trial lawyer, and the right can't nail him on trashing her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. I was kidding. Sort of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
81. Yep
Remember how they all claimed to hate trial lawyers? Maybe Reid is making it to where all the republicans will not like her because of that and encourage their republican reps to vote against her and then they won't get her on and hopefully Fitzgerald will have his case finished up and Bush can be gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #49
83. yes indeeedy-doodie
Harry knows what he's doing. This will make the freeptards cannibalize each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
94. Shame he didn't include that in his published statement.
No mention of "trial lawyer", whatsoever... although "trailblazer" certainly stands out:


I like Harriet Miers. As White House Counsel, she has worked with me in a courteous and professional manner. I am also impressed with the fact that she was a trailblazer for women as managing partner of a major Dallas law firm and as the first woman president of the Texas Bar Association.


“In my view, the Supreme Court would benefit from the addition of a justice who has real experience as a practicing lawyer. The current justices have all been chosen from the lower federal courts. A nominee with relevant non-judicial experience would bring a different and useful perspective to the Court.


“I look forward to the Judiciary Committee process which will help the American people learn more about Harriet Miers, and help the Senate determine whether she deserves a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court.”
http://reid.senate.gov/record2.cfm?id=246777
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
52. janeaustin, I laughed out loud at your post! Very funny!
(Surely you weren't serious about "stay tuned.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Go watch Reid's endorsement again.
In seeing it again, my only fear is that his strategy is too obvious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #58
82. Is it obvious to people who don't follow politics?
To your avearge person who just watches the pundit shows? I think that's who he is going for. People who like Limbaugh and his ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. P.S. The only thing we can do about this (as about Roberts or anything
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:56 PM by Peace Patriot
else) is to regain the sovereignty of the people of this country through transparent elections, and then...

a) elect a Congress who will change the number of justices, to outvote the appointments of this illegitimate regime; b) invalidate Bush's appointments, or impeach them; c) amend the Constitution to term-limit justices, or make them electable not appointed, and eliminate the current court. (...off the top of my head, contingent upon our being able to restore our right to vote.)

See my post (#96) at:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4956021
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
69. How do your Goldens feel about the right to privacy?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. "How do your Goldens feel about the right to privacy?"
Unfortunately, they have NO RESPECT FOR PRIVACY. I mean, they follow us into the bathroom, wedge themselves between us in bed, burst through any door that's not securely closed, and play "Look-Over-There-while-I-Grab-A-French-Fry-Off-Your-Plate" every time we eat.

On the other hand, they wouldn't dream of telling anybody else how to live, so I imagine they'd be OK on the legal issues of Privacy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. self delete
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 02:35 PM by libnnc
point made upthread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
89. Answers phone comment reminiscent of CON phone jamming?
CNN is summarizing his comments as "POSTIVE."

I hope this does not backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
91. Tried and true Democratic get along and go along strategy.
11 going on 12 years of defeat and retreat. Brilliant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
93. All I can say is "I'll have to see it to believe it"
However, I fervently hope that folks on this thread are right about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
95. Reids a boxer remember he's sizing up his enemey
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 04:38 PM by DanCa
He's playing marquis de queensberry and not going for the knock out blow. Size up your enenmy psych out your opposition build up your points and than take them out with a rock hard body blow in the 12th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #95
98. hope you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
97. ***Harry Reid's comments on CNN cut out TRIAL LAWYER
I hardly ever watch TV news, but I have family visiting so I watched CNN.

They played the clip of Harry Reid introducing her, but just the part between the times he said "trial lawyer" so it looked like he was just saying, "she's my kind of person."

I think there was some merit to the attempt to massage right wing fears about her rather than oppose her plainly, but this shows how it can backfire...

OK...now you can kill me (metaphorically, not literally Karl)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
100. I don't see why I can't have a shot at being
a Supreme Court justice. I'm pretty nice, plus I can hold my liquor and I'm a good cook, and I'm much better at applying eyeliner than Harriet Miers. Since that whole pesky not-having-ever-been-a-judge thing obviously isn't an issue, I'd like a good-paying job for life too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC