Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here she is ---pix->>>

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:52 AM
Original message
Here she is ---pix->>>
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:33 AM by Stephanie


A loyal member of his inner circle - it's almost like he's rigging the system, like he's worried about something.




Harriet Miers speaks after President Bush announced, Monday Oct. 3, 2005, that his White House counsel Harriet Miers, the first women president of the Texas State Bar and Bushs former personal attorney, is his choice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day OConnor. Bush made the announcement in the Oval Office in the White House. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/051003/480/whre10210031228




President Bush leaves the Oval Office of the White House with Harriet Miers in this Nov. 14, 2003 file photo. Bush has chosen Miers, White House counsel and a loyal member of the president's inner circle, to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, a senior administration official said Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/051003/480/ny11510031121






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. She's an unfortunate looking woman......
we Democrats have all the cuties and smarties on our side. But I'm SURE she's highly qualified. Right? RIGHT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MildyRules Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. OMG
Pot to kettle: Ruth Bader Ginsberg???

Let's not bring looks into this. Let's worry about her actual qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm Not Going To Comment Oh Anybody's Looks
but the Freepers play that card all the time....


They cherrypick all the "attractive" female Republicans and cherrypick all the "unattractive" female Democrats and then act as if they are making a point....


It's disgusting no matter whom the target...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Nor will I, but I wonder if that claimed age is honest.
She might be older than 60.

Which would be a good thing for the Republic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
57. how old
are they saying she is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. It's stupid as well
Although I will say there is something creepy about the eyes of these Bush nominees....They just LOOK evil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. Too much eyeliner.
Never good for older eyes. Too harsh.

She doesn't look evil to me-just looks like a "yes" man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
54. Not only that, but there's ageism involved.
It's depressing when people have such a juvenile attitude about other people solely on the basis of how they look.

I couldn't care less, and neither should anybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #54
87. I know. No one asks Henry Kissinger's suit size.
Except for rather bitchy surveys of Capitol Hill staffers (in which Paul Wellstone and Ron Dellums were, respectively, derided and lauded for their manner of dress), men in public life get away with whatever appearance.

Okay, Jon Stewart DID make fun of John Bolton's mustache. But that's the exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. What qualifications?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Unfortunate?
Being a bit generous, aren't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. no.....
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:59 AM by genevat
she's another crony..... ? wrong? wrong? ;) heaven help us once again. when is that anti-cronyism bill due to be passed?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the48er Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. *Not* Betty Davis Eyes
More like Tammy Faye, Katherine Harris, and Marty Feldman. Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. She is on NBC live now with Bush**
Frozen smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great .The first mullet on the USSC belongs to a woman? Thanks alot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. .
:spray:

That's her Jesus of Nazareth hair! Or a member of Nazareth :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
45. Your second choice is correct, at least in the sense of
groupieness.

I'm so ashamed of myself...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Frozen Smile? OMG
Sooo, she is another Stepford Wife? Are all Rethug women Stepford Wives? I am beginning to wonder...

Cat In Seattle <---stroking chin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Crush with eyeliner.
sorry that r.e.m. song sprung into my head for some reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. YUCK YUCK YUCK face would stop a nine day clock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. Will vomit bags be placed in the pocket of the chair ahead?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigersumtin Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
79. Oh lord, not only
Would she stop the clock, how bout make it run backwards. way to much eye liner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. Karen Hughes' long-lost sister?
All this talk of her association with bush, and yet I'm curious to know her past association with Karen "Middle East Sweetheart" Hughes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. Definitely lose the black eye liner.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
39. word.....she needs to lose it like a bad habit.....
or at least not ring her eyes with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. Some in this thread should be ASHAMED!
How the woman looks is so beneath comment!

There's so much in this announcement that's more important that the woman's appearance is the least of our worries.

How about the fact that she was Shrub's personal lawyer? That doesn't send a chill down anybody's spine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Why is it okay to comment about Bush's appearance?
We seem to have a double standard on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I never said that was okay and frequently ask that we stay on substance.
However, there are differences between talking about a person's eye make-up, wrinkles, and weight and talking about a particular expression that indicates mood or temperment.

Most of the comments about Bush's appearance are regarding his expression - an indication of his mind and temperment.

Criticizing a person's appearance as "unsexy" or "ugly" is inappropriate for a supposedly progressive person whether it's Bush, Cheney, Condi or Karen Hughes.

Saying that Condi's snarl makes her look particularly hostile today or that the boots she's chosen to wear have an overt militaristic character is not exactly the same thing as saying, "Man, her ass sure is big!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. So is it fair to wonder why a SC nominee is wearing so much eyeliner?
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 09:15 AM by Stephanie

She's caked it on like a desperate teenager. Note that my opening post was not about her appearance. I questioned her being a "loyal" member of the "inner circle." However, I'm tired of nannies telling us what we are allowed to say, especially if the subject is a woman. We often speculate about Bush's red face (drunk), his jaw grinding (coke jaw), his blemishes and injuries (drunk). And yet it's hands off the women. Laura Bush is a sacred cow around here. Don't say mean things about Laura! When she has done more to put the Chimp in office and smooth over his failings than ANYONE ELSE. When you join the criminal Bush Family you are FAIR GAME. I'm tired of the post policing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. here here
and with that said she should take 10 to 15 grand and have her face done. Or at least her damn eyelids for chrise sakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
72. Wow.
Maybe that's why the left in the US will always lose.

They out-freep the freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #72
83. Maybe your not up on all of our vote fraud here in the US
seeing as you don't live here. There is a forum right here on DU that can help you acquaint yourself with Diebold.

And maybe you didn't here about Florida 2000 down there in Costa Rica, but, it was quite the mess. :rollseyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #83
86. Oh, yes. There was voter fraud so we can be assholes.
Carte blanche!

I don't think you know what you're talking about, but you should consider that many of us who left the US after the 2004 elections did so in part because the left offers no real alternative.

It's bad enough to have the worst government in the world, but when the "opposition" :rofl: is as bad as the people in power, there is no point.

The opposition is as bad as the people in power because the supporters of the opposition are as bad also. You expect nothing, so you're manipulated and get nothing.

You eye surgery comment only serves as another example of the truth that DU can out freep the freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. Oh, you LEFT the US after the elections!
And now you sit in your Costa Rico armchair and criticize OUR behavior? We're here FIGHTING. You FLED. We need no advice from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #88
89. Oh, but you'll get it!
You're not even qualified to say what you need. You clearly have no idea.

By the way, you're not fighting. That's an illusion. You will not defeat Miers just like you didn't defeat Roberts, or Gonzales, or Rice, or Bolton, or the bankruptcy bill, or the medicare sham, or the tax cuts for the rich, or the Patriot Act II, etcettera.

No, you'll be fighting for better LOOKING Supreme Court justices while your nation circles the drain.

I promise to write to you in the concentration camps Miers helps Dubya put you in! :) The condition of her eyes should weigh heavily on your mind about that time. I'll include photos of people with BEAUTIFUL eyes to comfort you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. Yes, *concentration camps* jokes are in excellent taste!
Thanks for your wisdom and guidance. But really, I suggest you join www.democratsinexileunderground.com - you have nothing in common with those of us who are here fighting. Fight or Flight, you chose Flight. Enjoy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
71. Keep me out of your "We"
I have never contributed to discussions about anyone's personal appearance, coke jaw, drinking, etc.

I wonder what the point is regarding the eyeliner. What character trait does (in your mind) excessive eyeliner indicate? What bearing does that trait have on her qualifications for the court?

It's not about the gender of the person. I rejected the inane "observations" about Howard Dean having no neck, the pointless criticisms about John Kerry's elongated face, and the dismissal of John Edwards' intellect due to his "blow-dried" sex appeal.

Many people on this board NEED a fucking nanny because they act like children.

Since your first post wasn't about being a superficial image Nazi, I wasn't talking about you in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. Keep ME out of YOUR we.
Honestly how do you get off telling an entire board of Democrats what they are and are not allowed to say? If you don't like the discussion you are welcome to sit it out, but don't expect 70,000 posters to obey your rules.

As to the relevance of her eyeliner, it reveals to me that she is self-deluded and clueless. She is making herself up like Britney Spears on the day her SC nomination is announced. I find it reveals her immaturity.

Look, if you don't get it, that's okay with me. I'm not telling you what you're allowed to post here. But I will post whatever I like, within the DU rules. To each their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Where did I tell you or anyone else what they are allowed to say?
Please supply a quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. "I never said that was okay and frequently ask that we stay on substance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. That's not telling you what you can and can't say.
There's no free speech issue here, and you know it.

You and the other sweet, loving individuals who think calling a person a "sea hag" is appropriate are perfectly free to do so. There's absolutely nothing stoping you from doing the wrong thing except your own conscience.

Telling you that you shouldn't is not telling you that you can't. You always retain the right to be wrong.

It typifies exactly why the left in the US always loses so miserably. Many apparently can't begin to conceive what it actually means to have your speech regulated. The new Supreme Court should take care of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Know what?
I got drafted and FOUGHT for my country in 1971, and what for? FOR ME TO HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH - so guess what?

I'll call a saddlebag a saddlebag if I want to, and YOU have the freedom to IGNORE these comments.

Unless you are running for Jello Sheriff (Bill Cosby anyone?) or have doves that come to take your feces away..

My 500 lb pal was FAT and we made no bones about it, FAT, it means just what it says, and this woman is what I would call "coyote ugly" - one of my ugly female friends in Alaska used to laugh and say she had Three Arms on her wall as trophies of the men who went home drunk with her, woke up with their arms under her head on the pillow and chewed them off at the elbow to GET AWAY..

Even tho she was ugly she was a great pal, or you can do what Eddie Murphy used to say, "Hey, them ugly people are lonely, and they need sex as bad as you do, next time you see and ugly person, go up to them and say 'Dammit, Let's have SEX!' - Do them a favor.."

Or as one black (black! did I offend someone?) comedian said once, "Marry you an Ugly woman, she'll never cheat on you, and if you go out and get drunk, when you come home, she starts lookin' pretty Good.."

Be as PC as you want, be a being of Light, but don't tell other people that they can't INSULT NAZIS, PLEASE..

Holding our tongues is how these bastards get into office and KILL EVERYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
56. And don't forget newspaper photographers
are notorious for taking pictures of public figures when they look the most unflattering.

THOSE are the pictures that make it in newspapers and online, not the pictures which make the public figures look better.

I've seen a quite a few public figures in person, and without exception they look MUCH better in person than they do in pictures or even on television.

Only models and actors, who have tons and tons of makeup, cosmetic surgery, and the like, actually photograph better than they look in real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. C'mon, you know appearance is always the primary target for us on DU
We haven't even gotten to her shopping habits or the type of car she drives yet. Her stance on policies is waaaaayyyyy down the list.

Hmmm, I wonder where she buys her shoes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's not true either
And in fact this thread is about her being a member of the inner circle. And if you look, you'll see twenty threads already about her policies, her political contributions, and her assistance to Bush in the past. But why should we censor our conversation? Being too polite is a hindrance. The posters above are stating the obvious. It's a natural reaction. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Bashing this woman's looks is very childish.
Do we have a bunch of elementary or high school kids on this forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. No, we have a bunch of scolding nannies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. Yep, it sure does seem that way. Let em scold republicraps.
You will notice how well the "nice nice" strategy worked out for us all during the last campaign cycle.

We would be living in a different world today if Kerry would have royally kicked some republicrap ass. Lord knows there was enough of it hanging out there to be kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
75. Children need nannies.
It's like a bunch of junior high schoolers around here sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
80. I *Would* Agree
If it weren't for the Katherine Harris connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
36. wrong
She'll be easier to take on because she's an ugly woman, compared to Roberts, who was a generally, descent looking man.

Looks play a big part in people's perceptions.

Ugly = bad

In the minds of the American people, she'll be easier to be made into a bad person and someone not worthy of nomination if we pound hard enough. The fact that she looks like a zombie helps a lot in this regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
41. I believe she is a white house lawyer
Does that make her shrubs "personal" lawyer? I think there are a few obscure differences, but the effect is the same.

BTW, all this "playing nice" stuff did not work out too well for us during the last election cycle. A record number of volunteers, a record amount of money, and a record loss of power due to a crappy "but nice" campaign strategy. Maybe it IS time to rough up the opposition a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
63. She was his personal lawyer before the WH gig. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sub.theory Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
42. I'm feeling it
Not to mention the fact that she looks like a god damn vampire. I'm feeling the cold chills...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
46. When it comes to artificial means to one's looks, I amke an exception.
Unless her eyes are naturally rimmed that way. In that case :spank: me.

Seriously, the eyeliner goes to her judgment ability, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
67. What about this?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. He just threw her to the wolves, so the Dems can't attack
his real choice as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. this is what I'm wondering
I wonder if he doesn't really want a woman, so he throws her out, then goes with Gonzales when she's rejected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Because it's nothing but playground dribble - Grow up! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Excuse me?
What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
50. I replied to wrong post - I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. It's not whather he wants a woman or not
but if the Dems can make a girl cry on the stand, they're gonna be slaughtered by the media.

Yeah, it's shallow and dripping with mysogyny , but that's what I think is going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
47. Yup. I could almost feel sorry for her. Almost. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. Scary, but not as frightening as Chief Crazy Eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
34. She need to calm down on the eyeliner, it's not helping her beedie eyes.
she's a crony from the get go. boot her and start over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. I know. I haven't seen eyeliner like that since
the seventh grade in the late '70s -- that's what the stoner girls wore, thick black eyeliner all the way around the eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
35. I don't like Bush's "stealth nominee" tactics.
I know we've had Supreme Court Justices without experience as judges before, but he just DID this same thing with Roberts. I think leaving everyone in the dark on a candidate's position on key legal questions is rather disrespectful of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
37. I don't like to criticize people's looks, but I
can criticize her experience which is null. At least 1 year's experience like Clarence Thomas or something. Come on, she had never been a judge in her life....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
44. the giant cross she had around her neck today was cropped out
of the photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
48. Barbara Walters called and wants all three of the wigs back TODAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
49. Case worker from "Bettlejuice"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
51. Ugly?
Come on folks, this woman is completely average looking. You'd never notice anything unusual about her if you saw her in the mall on a Saturday morning. She doesn't even have "fanatical" eyes. She looks like your average businesswoman.

Must be something more to pick at than her looks, at least I hope so, because they aren't that bad for her age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringEmOn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
52. Sea Hag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bj2110 Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
55. So Bush nominated a corpse??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
58. Harriet in high school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
60. and here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mshasta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
61. another reptile on the wall.....................
they live, we die....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
62. "a pit bull in size 6 shoes" - according to Bush*
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/20/AR2005062001161.html

I don't like pit bulls. I really don't.

3 of them attacked a boy getting off a school bus last week near here.

Last month one killed an old man who had been sitting on his porch in the next county over.

Republicans sure seem to like them and what they represent. That they attack (pre-emptively) and don't let go - don't give up? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. it seems like those around bush lack anything behind their eyes...
maybe it is just me, but I get the distinct impression they are soulless...:shrug:

Look at bush's eyes in the first pic, it is as though there is NOTHING behind them! Look into her eyes, and the same impression is apparent. It is as if they are chosen simply because of the lack of a soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
65. damn
she looks worse than Helen Thomas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Congratulations!
You just outted yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. because i said helen thomas was ugly?
I respect and admire the woman, but please...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
66. Weird
today's photo looks like a completely different woman than the woman in the older photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
70. Claude Rains in drag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMoonBat Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
73. That last one looks like Horseshack (from Welcome Back Kotter) in drag.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
74. Grow up, people!!! Stop bashing her appearance.
It is childish and immature. I am sure a lot of you are not any better looking than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #74
82. Why not scold the republiturds?
Or, do you only flame democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
78. Shouldn't the replacement be a Black or Hispanic woman
Democrat? I mean if he were a real President, he would try to balance the court since those are life long appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
85. separated at birth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC