Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HOw much longer on Fitzgerald's investigation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:07 PM
Original message
HOw much longer on Fitzgerald's investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. the Grand Jury should be winding it up next month I heard on AAR
today. Mid to late October
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. My birthday is in October,
the 22nd. This would be a great gift!:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. With Miller testifying tomorrow
that's the end. We'll have indictments in a matter of weeks, I'm guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. May all your guesses be right... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. For what.....another 45 days have passed and nothing yet....
<snip>

What Now, Karl?
Rove and Ashcroft face new allegations in the Valerie Plame affair

by Murray Waas
August 13th, 2005 2:39 PM

Justice Department officials made the crucial decision in late 2003 to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the leak of the identity of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame in large part because investigators had begun to specifically question the veracity of accounts provided to them by White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to senior law enforcement officials.
Several of the federal investigators were also deeply concerned that then attorney general John Ashcroft was personally briefed regarding the details of at least one FBI interview with Rove, despite Ashcroft's own longstanding personal and political ties to Rove, the Voice has also learned. The same sources said Ashcroft was also told that investigators firmly believed that Rove had withheld important information from them during that FBI interview.

Those concerns by senior career law enforcement officials regarding the propriety of such briefings continuing, as Rove became more central to the investigation, also was instrumental in the naming of special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

<more>
<link> http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0533,waasweb1,66861,2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does Miller hold the final puzzle piece?
I agree with another poster that you don't ask a question unless you already know the answer. Does Miller just serve to confirm what is already known? Will she lie to protect * and the administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaggy1974 Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This is all very strange.
Why does Libby release her now? Why let her sit there for that period of time? Do they think that nothing is going to come of this? I just have a bad feeling that this is all going to be for naught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hi shaggy1974!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. My opinion is that GJ knows all.
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 09:28 PM by longship
Fitz is undoubtedly careful, deliberate, and complete in his investigation. If I could get into his mind, I might hold off until I had all the pieces I could get before issuing any findings to the public.

The administration's inevitable response will be to Swiftboat Fitzgerald. I'm sure he is acutely aware of this. If I were him, I would want to have *all* my ducks in line. I think they know the whole picture, but only need Miller to give more gravitas to the findings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebaghwan Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Grand Jury expires October 28th.
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC