Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush blames three preceding presidents for today's terror trouble!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:08 PM
Original message
Bush blames three preceding presidents for today's terror trouble!
Carter, Clinton, and *gasp* reagan are his targets.

"To leave Iraq now would be to repeat the costly mistakes of the past that led to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Bush said in remarks at the Pentagon after a two-hour briefing by Defense Department officials on the status of the U.S. offensive in Iraq and the war on terrorism.

He cited as examples the U.S. response to the hostage crisis in Iran during the Carter administration, the Lebanon bombing under Reagan, and four crises that occurred during the Clinton administration: the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa, and the attack on the Cole.

"The terrorists concluded that we lacked the courage and character to defend ourselves, and so they attacked us," said the president, as Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and top military officials stood at his side.

Bush did not mention any events during the first Bush administration, such as his father's decision to end the first Gulf War without sending coalition troops on to Baghdad to topple Saddam Hussein's regime...


"article" has more.

Gee, poppy can do no wrong? :eyes: (poppy, for one, allowed saddam to arm his troops in helicopters after the first gulf war ended in 1991... as a result, saddam promptly resumed killing his own people... and no good deed goes unpunished, saddam later gives poppy a death threat (1996?).)

Nice to see reagan in there, but let's face it: Anyone who did nothing to disconnect the US with those middle eastern lands is at fault. Carter, I do not believe, did any wrong and many believe the 1980 elections and the related Iran hostage situation were a bit contrived... but I'm not saying Carter isn't guilty of anything.

But let's face it. * quickly spins some truth into his usual Iraqi wet dream, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. what about poppy ?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about his dad
Seems to me Poppy was one of the bigger Kingmakers in the middle east, when he was head of the CIA and when he was VP and President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. forgot to mention Poppy gave Saddam a green light to invade Kuwait
"Local border disputes are of no interest to the US" Ambassador April Glaspie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And didn't Kuwait slant-drill into Iraq?
I dunno if that's true, but if Connecticut slant-drilled into Texas, I doubt anyone would be too happy either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. It Wasn't A Green Light
At least, not according to Tarik Aziz.
http://csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/durableRedirect.pl?/durable/1999/05/27/p23s3.htm

But, Ms. Glaspie (US ambassador to Iraq) did say when asked about her "no interest" comment that they didn't think the Iraqis would take ALL of Kuwait.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Retaliation
that's all it is....Clinton and Carter have both been critical of Dubya over the Katrina response so the schoolyard bully has to hit back....

I am SOOOOOOOOOOO reminded of the picture of Bush in school playing rugby where he is delivering what the yearbook captioned as an "...illegal but satisfying blow." to an opponent. That's what he did again today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. It ain't my fault!
it ain't my fault that there's civil war in Iraq
it ain't my fault that there's more terrorists in Iraq then there ever were
it ain't my fault that no country likes us
it ain't my fault that we have a huge deficit
it ain't my fault that i've killed over 5000 americans during my term

And so on and so forth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. He forgot to blame Gerald Ford
and Richard Nixon, and Lyndon Johnson, and......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. they've been trying to blame FDR for the Cold War lately
According to some recent RW crapola, it's all FDR's & Truman's fault the Cold War happened... they should have joined with the Nazi army and invaded the Soviet Union. Of course, they seemingly forget what happened to Hitler a few years earlier and then before that with that Napoleon fella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is this end of the Bush 'No Blame' game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. What surprises me is that he threw in reagan.
Probably tokenism, of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The Pagan God to the Neo-Conservatives, Ronald Reagan
Gotta hit all the senior citizens who loved Ronnie, Hypno...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great Hindsight
Some talking heads have been saying for years that our policies of not standing up to terrorists for the thirty or so years preceding 9-11 led to those attacks. Strangely, I don't remember anyone really talking about it during the campaign. What I do remember is when Clinton pulled out troops out of Somalia the attitude was if they didn't want our help, screw them. And in 1998, everything Clinton tried to do to fight terror was "wagging the dog"

But, maybe I misremember.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. bu$h can't even handle two hurricanes with advanced warning.
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 09:16 PM by RC
How the hell is he going to defend against a real terrorist attack with no warning? No, wait, they are the terrorists here. chenney will control it from his underground war room.


"The terrorists concluded that we lacked the courage and character to defend ourselves, and so they attacked us," said the president, as Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and top military officials stood at his side."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bu$h Attacks Reagan???
How can Bu$h possibly criticize the "Greatest American"? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. What did Carter do wrong?
He didn't appease the terrorists at all. Not one bit. They wanted him to turn the Shah over to them for trial and he told them to go to hell. In the end he got every last one of those hostages home alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robertwf Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's the Victim Stance
He's simply blaming others and setting himself up to be the victim. It's psychopathy, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. The 1980 election - a BIT contrived?
The Reagan campaign made contact with the Iranians and made some kind of a deal - weapons - to keep the hostages until after dickhead was inaugarated. Sick and evil is the only way anyone with any decency could describe a Repuke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. "A bit contrived"?
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 10:38 PM by omega minimo
"many believe the 1980 elections and the related Iran hostage situation were a bit contrived..."

When you if do some reading on that you may recognize many names from the current administration.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC