Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the term "b**ch-slap" be permitted on DU?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:38 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should the term "b**ch-slap" be permitted on DU?
Here's the definition from the newest edition of the Oxford Dictionary of English, widely considered the last word (no pun intended) on proper English usage.

OED does not generally include connotations. If "bitch-slap" simply consisted of OEDs definition, I wouldn't even be asking, but I think we all realize that it has long since passed this mark in connotation.

--------

bitch-slap: verb, to deliver a stinging blow to (someone), typically in order to humiliate them: "I would have bitch-slapped him for talking that way." Origin 1990s: originally black English, referring to a woman hitting or haranguing her male partner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Although I don't condone violence against men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I bitch-slap freepers on a daily basis
So I voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. this post is EXACTLY why the term should not be used
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 09:22 AM by Terwilliger
anybody wanna ask sgr what he thinks "bitch-slap" means?

OnEdit: shoudl -> should
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. let's try two ways of reading it
I just acted like a nagging wife who slapped her hubby to that freeper.

Or I just dealt a violent slap which shook that freeper senseless? (Ala the big brute husband slapping the wife senseless for not fixing dinner the right way).

Which usage is more likely the intended image to be conveyed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Many People Need
a 'dope-slap' but a 'b**ch-slap' carries with it a severe negative connotation. So, I guess it depends on the way it is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lol! Who could vote, 'no?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Me, although I voted "yes." I was torn.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 09:07 AM by blondeatlast
I'd rather find a better alternative, like "dope-slap" or GodBush'nCheney's "bush-slap."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Me, too.
The OED has a lot of words that would be innappropriate.

LC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicoleM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Me.
I don't like the word "bitch." It's demeaning to women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. well... perhaps those who think that using language
to convey public humiliation of women via domestic violence, are lacking in verbal abilities if that gratuitous image is needed to make the point; or that making so mundane in our language phrases that condone domination violence against women helps perpetuate attitudes that leave some less restrained males less able to recognize that these behviors are not socially acceptable?

Use the term - just know what it really means (and the thread originator's definition is a tad off, btw) - and do so prepared to take some flack for it - for one may have the right to express exceptionally violent images but others have the right to call on the use of such language.

However, the use of the term tends to reflect more negatively on the user (sort of like Arnies gratuitous use of boorish terms for parts of the female anatomy) than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. yes, but people should consider voluntarily not using the word
if it offends people, why insist on using it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I voted "yes" for that reason; I think there are good alternatives that
convey the same emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought I might see this coming...
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 08:55 AM by rasputin1952
but I really didn't expect it so quickly.

I am not offended by your question; I am offended in the notion that all of the sudden, we are asking, or rather looking for, new ways to censor speech.

My point is, if we can allow explicit writing on any subject, why are we starting to look at specific words or phrases to censor?

Next it will be'fuck', or 'shit' or 'asshole', 'douchebag' 'scumbag', the list is endless.

We all know we need a tough skin to hang around in here, it can get pretty rough, but that comes with the territory. A creeping censorship, is far worse that an overt censorship. I can sympathize, but that is not the point, the only viable censorship, is self-censorship.

I see and read all kinds of things that offend me every day, but I am not the moral police. The language we have to use, is a poor enough way to communicate, I say, use all you can.

edited for spelling/grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicoleM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. There are already things you can't say here.
For example, some people like to say things like "Ann Coulter is such a slut!" when that's not what they mean at all. They don't like her so they attack her sexuality. I checked with the Admins and it's not allowed.

Do you think we should be able to use racial slurs on this board? Is there anything you think should be off-limits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. I don't mind many of those things
but think that phrases meant to convey heavy duty domestic violence against women, used to make a point, ought to be thought about. Talk about creating a hostile environment.

I am glad the conversation is happening - because at least perhaps some will think about the choice of language - and what it is conveying, as well as what it conveys about the user of the language rather than mindlessly using a term that just numbs us to the point where violence against women is.. hohum.

Think about it - in order to convey that one just delivered a great verbal blow to a debate opponent - one has to bring in a visual that connotes picking a woman up and swatting her so hard she goes flying across a room? Great visual. No better way to make the point, eh?

If folks want to be boorish and exude a certain hostility towards fellow duers - so be it. But be aware of the backlash - because my speaking out against the particular language usage is no less freedom of expression than the choice to use that particular idiom. Likewise my challenging it is no more damaging to society (in the name of freedome of speech) than the use of that term (in the name of deadening the sensitivities to the reemergence of societal attitudes -via the fundies - to submissiveness of women, even at use of humiliation if need be).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. "pimp-slap" is less sexist
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. Except
that a bitch-slap is one administered by a woman, while a pimp-slap is administered by a man, so why do you find one more acceptable than another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Administrations thoughts (Skinner);
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 08:57 AM by blondeatlast
"We generally use the "prime time TV" standard.

If a term is legal on prime time TV, then it's usually legal here. My understanding is that "bitch slap" is permitted on prime time television."

Here's the thread, on edit:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=120&topic_id=4972&mesg_id=4972

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. No.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 08:57 AM by Flying_Pig
It's low-class street pimp vernacular, that is degrading to women. If the term"bitch" were gender neutral, I wouldn't have so much of a problem with it, but as it is a feminine word, I say dump it. How about "punk slap"? That is gender neutral.

Bottom line though, is that it's an unbecoming word, that has no place in thoughful political discourse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. can we change it to "pimp-slap"
Which, I always felt was a much cooler term.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Be the change you wish to see in the world
You can't change one word to another, but you can use one word instead of another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Be the change you wish to see in the world
EXCELLANT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I think it's a Gandhi quote
And Excellent reminds me of a quote too

"Be excellent to each other, and PARTY ON DUDES"- Abraham Lincoln in Bill and Ted's excellent adenture, San Dima CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sexybomber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. I use that one anyway. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Yes, but I never have liked the saying
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 09:08 AM by Gman
It's demeaning to women, period. It suggests slapping around women is so common that it's now a euphenism. It suggests that it's ok to slap around women. I don't like the saying and I don't use it. But, I'm not going to say what someone can and cannot say. Anyone with any respect for women would not use the phrase. If someone using the phrase has never thought about what it actually implies, personally I think they're clueless and need to consider whether or not they really are a liberal. True liberals are always sensitive to women and their sensitivities and their well-being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. Shouldn't we use a more Pro-Democratic term like "Donkey Punch"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm thinking that a good alternative would be...
..."Bush-slap".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoKrunch Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Ha!
I like that one.

Mojo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoKrunch Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Voted No. Use dope-slap instead.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 09:22 AM by MojoKrunch
Non-gender specific and way less violent sounding.

"Dopes" *deserved* to be slapped, right?

Hey, it works for Click and Clack.

Mojo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. No
I think that term is particularly misogynist, since it came from the idea of hitting women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trigz Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. You could also call it a "cow-pat". :D Sorry, that was silly (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
25. People using the term should be fully aware of the conotations
and if use them - know that they are being obnioxious and offensive.

I disagree with the above definition -

Have primarily seen the term used in two ways: refering to a very violent and humiliating blow given by a man to a woman (as in haul off so hard she gets hurled across the room); or in a prison type context where one inmate delivers a blind-siding takedown in order to humilate another prisoner into submission.

The reason the above connotation (in the thread originator) doesn't really hold, in terms of colloquial connotations - is the term is used to convery humiliation - and most women delivering the "slap" do not do so in a convincing enough way to deliver humiliation. This is not about the "bitch" doing the slapping it is about the "bitch" getting the slapping.

So users - know what you are saying if you use this term. Know that many readers will see it as willful use of language that has conjours up images of excessive domestic violence. And deal with the reprecussions (eg folks calling the gratuitious use of the term) as the same kind of free speech (of criticism) that was exercised in using the term. And if readers conjour up a particular image of the type of person who needs to bring visuals of domestic violence into their discussion to make their point... so be it. Not all readers - but some will. So do so not out of ignorance - but fully embracing your choice of language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. yes...that definition is backwards
what's with that? sheesh...everyone knows what it means yet the dictionary screws it up..go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Perhaps literalists
string the terms together "female-slap" so female must do the slapping?

The dictionary is less important than the normal use of the word. Somehow I doubt: I just bitch-slapped a freeper; is meant to mean: I just acting like a nagging wife and splapped a freeper; but instead to mean - I just got a sneak and heavy/duty/abusive slap in and humilated that freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Your arguemnt
seems to suggest that if women could hit as hard as men, it would be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
28. No. It's genuinely offensive
in my opinion. There's a LOT of language used here that offends me, but I generally just ignore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veracity Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. let's cut the anti woman stuff
"bitch" is still an unacceptable term for a woman... There's no reason to us term that denigrates women's behavior. We're pretty capable of expressing ourselves with less offensive words.

It's not about "allowing" the word.....freedom of speech aside. It's about giving tacit approval to an ugly image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. I disagree
I keep bitch in my vocabulary. Although I rarely use it, it's the perfect word sometimes. Just as are bastard and dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elad ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
37. I'm locking this thread
Skinner has already answered this question in ATA. If we wanted this to be put up to a vote, we would have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC