Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US "Envisions" Using "Nuculer" weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
true_notes Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:05 PM
Original message
US "Envisions" Using "Nuculer" weapons
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050911/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/nuclear_doctrine

Hmph, seems like the evil viral scum in dc have something up their sleeves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, Jesus.
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 11:10 PM by the dogfish
Tell me that twisted bastard's going to unleash a nuke to bury the Katrinagate story.

Karl Rove? He's like Doctor Evil now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The logic is amazing.
One scenario for a possible nuclear pre-emptive strike in the draft would be in the case of an "imminent attack from adversary biological weapons that only effects from nuclear weapons can safely destroy."

The Bush administration is continuing to push for development of an earth-penetrating nuclear warhead, but has yet to obtain congressional approval.

However, the Senate voted in July to revive the "bunker-buster" program that Congress last year decided to kill.

Administration officials have maintained that the U.S. needs to try to develop a nuclear warhead that would be capable of destroying deeply buried targets including bunkers tunneled into solid rock.

But opponents said that its benefits are questionable and that such a warhead would cause extensive radiation fallout above ground killing thousands of people. And they say it may make it easier for a future president to decide to use the nuclear option instead of a conventional weapon.

*****

Translation: Let's stop a biological attack by launching an (even more deadly) nuclear one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Look out you evil looting raping Gulf States that have made
Commander Cuckoobananas look foolish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the worst idea in the long sad history of bad ideas
Remember 'known stockpiles' of wmd would include Colon Bowel's portable bioweapons labs (aka hydrogen generators for weather and barrage balloons) pre invasion.

This puts us firmly in a new catagory "Rogue Superpower."

Remember, you heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Worst president ever.
War criminal.

If Curveball says there are wmd some place, that doesn't make it true.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RallyInDC Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. totally insane....all of them
Throw rove in and lock away the key, end this crap once and for all. these bastards want to blow themselves up!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, they have vast underground bunkers.
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 11:31 PM by Carolab
That ensure "continuity of government".

This is otherwise known as "Octopus" or the "Shadow Government".

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/092291589X/104-1707464-9506317?v=glance

From Publishers Weekly
What if, on September 11, 2001, United flight 93 had crashed into the Capitol, as some believe the terrorists had planned? Helms, an expert on clandestine and pirate radio, offers a nightmare scenario for what might have followed: the president could have declared a state of emergency and an unelected "shadow government," housed in hidden bunkers, would have gone into operation; civil liberties would have been suspended; civilian authorities in various cities would yield to military Special Forces. Is all this legal? Yes, according to Helms-a series of laws passed during WWII and after have concentrated much power in the president and created a Continuity of Government program in the event of a national emergency. Helms describes at length the past uses of executive orders to subvert civil liberties, such as FDR's order 9066, which led to the detention of Japanese-Americans, looks at the role of the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("the scariest agency in the entire government"), and sweeping security steps that have been contemplated in the wake of September 11. Readers concerned with the possible loss of civil liberties will find their worst fears confirmed here.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is Chaney's task force.
In the event of another attack by "terrorists" we nuke Iran.

Thats right, Iran.

Whether they did it or not.

Read the document on the pentagon website. It was discussed on DU almost a month ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. of course they are!
wake up ya'll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC