Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rec'd email: "time to clean house" i.e. sweep Dems out of LA. FACTS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:15 AM
Original message
Rec'd email: "time to clean house" i.e. sweep Dems out of LA. FACTS?
Does anyone have any sources showing whether the claims made in this missive are facts?

Things like:

Is there a Max Mayfield in Nat'l Hurricane Center, and did he call NO Mayor and Gov. Blanco?

Did Pres. call Blanco and "beg" her to allow military in her state? If so, did she say it wasn't necessary?

Y'know, just little things like that. I'm not averse to research but I'm just beginning my work day and haven't time. Tho't some great DUers might already have seen this and have the answers.

Thanks.

~EMAIL REC'D~

It's time for Louisiana folks to clean house on the Governors office and ALL New Orleans politicians! Don't let anybody tell you it's all Bush's fault!!!

Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 1:40 PM Subject: The battle over New Orleans

On Friday night before the storm hit Max Mayfield of the National Hurricane Center took the unprecedented action of calling Nagin and Gov. Blanco personally to plead with them to begin MANDATORY evacuation of NO and they said they'd take it under consideration. This was after the NOAA buoy 240 miles south had recorded 68' waves before it was destroyed.

President Bush spent Friday afternoon and evening in meetings with his advisors and administrators drafting all of the paperwork required for a state to request federal assistance (and not be in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act or having to enact the Insurgency Act). Just before midnight Friday evening the President called Governor Blanco and pleaded with her to sign the request papers so the federal government and the military could legally begin mobilization and call up. He was told that they didn't think it necessary for the federal government to be involved yet. After the President's final call to the governor she held meetings with her staff to discuss the political ramifications of bringing federal forces. It was decided that if they allowed federal assistance it would make it look as if they had failed so it was agreed upon that the feds would not be invited in. Saturday before the storm hit the President again called Gov. Blanco and Nagin requesting they please sign the papers requesting federal assistance, that they declare the state an emergency area, and begin mandatory evacuation.

After a personal plea from the President, Nagin agreed to order an evacuation, but it would not be a full mandatory evacuation, and the governor still refused to sign the papers requesting and authorizing federal action. In frustration the President declared the area a national disaster area before the state of Louisiana did so he could legally begin some advanced preparations. Rumor has it that the President's legal advisers were looking into the ramifications of using the insurgency act to bypass the Constitutional requirement that a state request federal aid before the federal government can move into state with troops - but that had not been done since 1906 and the Constitutionality of it was called into question to use before the disaster.

Throw in that over half the federal aid of the past decade to NO for levee construction, maintenance, and repair was diverted to fund a marina and support the gambling ships. Toss in the investigation that will look into why the emergency preparedness plan submitted to the federal government for funding and published on the city's website was never implemented and in fact may have been bogus for the purpose of gaining additional federal funding as we now learn that the organizations identified in the plan were never contacted or coordinating into any planning - though the document implies that they were.

The suffering people of NO need to be asking some hard questions as do we all, but they better start with why Gov. Blanco refused to even sign the multi-state mutual aid pack activation documents until Wednesday which further delayed the legal deployment of National Guard from adjoining states. Or maybe ask why Nagin keeps harping that the President should have commandeered 500 Greyhound busses to help him when according to his own emergency plan and documents he claimed to have over 500 busses at his disposal to use between the local school busses and the city transportation busses - but he never raised a finger to prepare them or activate them.

This is a sad time for all of us to see that a major city has all but been destroyed and thousands of people have died with hundreds of thousands more suffering, but it's certainly not a time for people to be pointing fingers and trying to find a bigger dog to blame for local corruption and incompetence. Pray to God for the survivors that they can start their lives anew as fast as possible and we learn from all the mistakes to avoid them in the future.

~END EMAIL~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CascadeTide Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like he is
It looks like Max Mayfield is the director of the National Hurricane Center.

The rest is clearly a campaign that's being initiated from the White House to deflect their fault in the aftermath to the local response before the storm. The feds should have had a clear picture of how many were still in the city (they did know ~20,000 were at the superdome didn't they?) but it took them 6 days to initiate a response.

Whatever the fault of the local officials in the beginning, in the end these were American citizens that were abandoned by the only ones who could help them, their federal government. The local officals aren't answerable to me, the federal government is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Welcome CascadeTide to DU! I read that Mayfield called Bush!
This was before the storm hit. And the gov has said repeatedly that she tried calling Bush and was not put in contact with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's the Rush ditto head style
A half truth followed by an innuendo and a shaded lie.

A slight misstatement of fact followed by a Rovian misinterpretation.

Ray Taliafero was discussing this missive last night -- and surgically demolished it half truth by half truth and innuendo by innuendo and shading by shading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ummm..."now is not the time to play the Blame Game"
Funny how that only works in one direction, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gonna be a lot easier to "clean house" not that they've
evacuated so many people out of state. How many of those people do you think will be able to return to vote in 06? Since the people who lived in the districts that tended to vote Dem may not consider themselves to be residents of Louisiana any longer, then this could be a reality by virtue of the relocation itself. Why didn't they evacuate to communities farther up state and less affected? Why did they send so many so far from their homes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Phone Call that Wasn't (Media Matters debunks Bush Begging for Evac)
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/09/07/phone_call/index.html

The phone call that wasn't

Salon editorial fellow Aaron Kinney looks at the latest rumor to carom through the conservative echo chamber.

The most recent tack by conservatives defending President Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina has been to pin the blame for the fiasco on state and local officials. As part of that effort, some commentators are saying that in the run-up to the storm, President Bush was so upset with New Orleans officials' preparations that he personally called Ray Nagin, the city's mayor, to urge an evacuation of the city.

The problem with that assertion? It's dead wrong. Media Matters for America has reverse engineered the rumor -- which has been repeated by Bob Williams in the Wall Street Journal and Brit Hume on Fox News, among others -- and traced it back to its source. According to Media Matters, an Associated Press story on the evacuation neglected to mention when Bush's call took place or whom he called. From there the story made its way onto conservative blogs like Power Line, and it was off and running. But it turns out that the president called Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco, not Mayor Nagin, and that the conversation occurred just prior to a joint press conference at 9:30 a.m. on Sunday, Aug. 28, called by the governor and mayor held to announce the evacuation. So Bush didn't prompt the evacuation order so much as second it.

But don't take our word for it. Here's how White House spokesman Scott McClellan described the call in his briefing today: "And the President, if you'll recall, on Sunday morning, was in touch with Governor Blanco .... he spoke to Governor Blanco around 9:00 a.m., had a good conversation with her about some of the things that needed to be done ahead of the hurricane hitting the Gulf Coast."

This is the second time the right-wing spin corps has been caught in the act since Hurricane Katrina. Over the weekend, The Washington Post and Newsweek were snookered by the White House into writing, falsely, that Gov. Blanco was delinquent in declaring a state of emergency for Louisiana. (The Post issued a correction; Newsweek has not.)

With the facts getting this mixed up, what we need is a timeline that lays out step-by-step how the crisis developed. Luckily, there are several, as Think Progress, Alternet and Talking Points Memo have all posted lists that detail how the calamity unfolded. Call it the Rove Patrol.

-------------------------------SNIP--------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. great start, thank you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Phone Call that Wasn't (Media Matters debunks Bush Begging for Evac)
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/09/07/phone_call/index.html

The phone call that wasn't

Salon editorial fellow Aaron Kinney looks at the latest rumor to carom through the conservative echo chamber.

The most recent tack by conservatives defending President Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina has been to pin the blame for the fiasco on state and local officials. As part of that effort, some commentators are saying that in the run-up to the storm, President Bush was so upset with New Orleans officials' preparations that he personally called Ray Nagin, the city's mayor, to urge an evacuation of the city.

The problem with that assertion? It's dead wrong. Media Matters for America has reverse engineered the rumor -- which has been repeated by Bob Williams in the Wall Street Journal and Brit Hume on Fox News, among others -- and traced it back to its source. According to Media Matters, an Associated Press story on the evacuation neglected to mention when Bush's call took place or whom he called. From there the story made its way onto conservative blogs like Power Line, and it was off and running. But it turns out that the president called Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco, not Mayor Nagin, and that the conversation occurred just prior to a joint press conference at 9:30 a.m. on Sunday, Aug. 28, called by the governor and mayor held to announce the evacuation. So Bush didn't prompt the evacuation order so much as second it.

But don't take our word for it. Here's how White House spokesman Scott McClellan described the call in his briefing today: "And the President, if you'll recall, on Sunday morning, was in touch with Governor Blanco .... he spoke to Governor Blanco around 9:00 a.m., had a good conversation with her about some of the things that needed to be done ahead of the hurricane hitting the Gulf Coast."

This is the second time the right-wing spin corps has been caught in the act since Hurricane Katrina. Over the weekend, The Washington Post and Newsweek were snookered by the White House into writing, falsely, that Gov. Blanco was delinquent in declaring a state of emergency for Louisiana. (The Post issued a correction; Newsweek has not.)

With the facts getting this mixed up, what we need is a timeline that lays out step-by-step how the crisis developed. Luckily, there are several, as Think Progress, Alternet and Talking Points Memo have all posted lists that detail how the calamity unfolded. Call it the Rove Patrol.

-------------------------------SNIP--------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, Blanco declared the state a disaster area on Friday
Bush didn't do so until Saturday, that's a lie.

Nagin followed the city's evacuation plan and achieved an unprecedented 80% evacuation of the city. The best estimates from prior experience and from exercises to test preparedness indicated 60% could be evacuated, thus Nagin exceeded all prior expectations.

The list goes on. It's all bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. excellent points
thanks, ET :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dr. Mayfield DID speak to bush on the Saturday BEFORE
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 08:43 AM by Spazito
the hurricane hit:

"On Saturday night, Mayfield was so worried about Hurricane Katrina that he called the governors of Louisiana and Mississippi and the mayor of New Orleans. On Sunday, he even talked about the force of Katrina during a video conference call to President Bush at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

"I just wanted to be able to go to sleep that night knowing that I did all I could do," Mayfield said."

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/30/State/For_forecasting_chief.shtml

Edited to add: Re bush begging Blanco to federalize so that troops can go in, that, too is crap:

"Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state's emergency operations center said Saturday.

The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor. Louisiana officials rejected the request after talks throughout the night, concerned that such a move would be comparable to a federal declaration of martial law. Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. "Quite frankly, if they'd been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals," said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/03/AR2005090301680.html





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Be Careful
I am worried all of the blaming of the Bush Admin are going to hurt us in the end. I think as time goes by and facts come out there will be enough blame to go around. Many in LA will realize their state and local leadership has failed them in more ways and for much longer than FEMA has. LA has 10 electoral votes and have been a swing state for quite some time. I think our leadership must be very careful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Bush's FEMA killed people. We all know it happened. We all saw it happen
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 08:53 AM by jsamuel
I am sure some blame goes to local/state LA, but what we saw on tv was all Bush, Homeland Security, and FEMA.

It isn't blame... it is ACCOUNTABILITY. The leadership was non-existent. The Dems have a responsibility to show who is accountable for this failure and should broadcast it everywhere.

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. hi, pipoman
Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Um
:popcorn: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftfish Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. It was Friday September 2nd that Bush called Blanco you Republican idiots
look at this Washington Post article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/03/AR2005090301680.html(the one they had to add the correction to about when Blanco declared a state of emergency). Doesn't it seem the idiot who wrote this email is taking things that happened Sept. 2nd and claiming they happened the week before? The rejection by Blanco of federalizing the evacuation and recovery occurred a week after this purported phone call that never happened. Of course with the right wing's love of partial truths, since it happened on a Friday they consider it fair game to claim the call was made the Friday before. It really is pathetic.

"Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state's emergency operations center said Saturday.

The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor. Louisiana officials rejected the request after talks throughout the night, concerned that such a move would be comparable to a federal declaration of martial law. Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. "Quite frankly, if they'd been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals," said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly.

A senior administration official said that Bush has clear legal authority to federalize National Guard units to quell civil disturbances under the Insurrection Act and will continue to try to unify the chains of command that are split among the president, the Louisiana governor and the New Orleans mayor.

Louisiana did not reach out to a multi-state mutual aid compact for assistance until Wednesday, three state and federal officials said. As of Saturday, Blanco still had not declared a state of emergency, the senior Bush official said."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftfish Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Which Friday?
as I reread the article I realize how crappily it is written and how open it is to interpretation that it might be either Friday. Thank you Washington Post for making this so clear. I believe I am correct though in stating that this article is describing a power struggle which occurred in the wake of Katrina, not before. Someone correct me if I am wrong. The Friday before Katrina Bush was in la la land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. By looking at the date of the article, I think we can deduce
that it was Friday, September 2nd.

Many Evacuated, but Thousands Still Waiting
White House Shifts Blame to State and Local Officials

By Manuel Roig-Franzia and Spencer Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, September 4, 2005; Page A01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. DEBUNK!
I have been debunking this crap all week to the point of my arm hurting from typing and cutting and pasting. Here you go!



What did each do?

1. "The mayor, with 5 days advance, waited until 2 days before he announced a mandatory evacuation (at the behest of the President). The he failed to provide transportation for those without transport even though he had hundreds of buses at his disposal."

FALSE:

Slow developing weather conditions (primarily hurricane) will create increased readiness culminating in an evacuation order 24 hours (12 daylight hours) prior to predicted landfall. Disabled vehicles and debris will be removed from highways so as not to impede evacuation. In local evacuations involving more than fifty (50) families (i.e. 50 single dwelling units), staging areas may be established at the closest available public area outside the threatened area. Upon arrival at the staging area, evacuees will be directed to the appropriate shelter facility. Evacuees will be encouraged to stay with friends or relatives in non-threatened areas whenever possible. Security measures will be employed to protect the evacuated area(s) in accordance with established procedures and situations.

http://www.cityofno.com/SystemModules/PrintPage.aspx?portal=46&tabid=26

THAT IS THE CITY'S EVACUATION POLICY. NAGIN FOLLOWED IT EXACTLY AS HE IS REQUIRED TO! BUSES WERE USED! CITY BUSES WERE USED TO TAKE PEOPLE TO SAFE PLACES!

School buses were used at least until 3 people died on one probably because of being stuck in traffic and the HEAT for so long.

Traffic was backed up for hours with people trying to leave NO. Keep in mind school buses have no AC or bathrooms. Imagine beginning stuck with a bus full of people and no where to go to the bathroom.

After this Nagin stopped using the buses and begged FEMA to send Greyhound type buses instead to take people out.

Once again, it looks like Nagin did everything humanly possible while FEMA was too worried about maintaining a good image to bother saving lives.

Nagin evacuated 80% of the city before the storm made landfall.

FEMA estimated in its last simulation of such an event (the now famous "Hurricane Pam" simulation) that at best we could expect 60% to evacuate the city.

Nagin saved 20% more than FEMA thought was even possible.

What's more he got 80% evacuated without the feds lifting a finger to help!

AT BEHEST OF THE PRESIDENT? THAT IS FALSE!
Nagin and Blanco were about to hold a press conference announcing the evacuation when Bush called!

3. "The Governor, despite a declaration of disaster by the President 2 DAYS BEFORE the storm hit, failed to take advantage of the offer of Federal troops and aid. Until 2 DAYS AFTER the storm hit."

FALSE!

In the Governor's letter to the President on 8/27/05 the following was included, which is a formal request for the President to take action:

Under the provisions of Section 501 (a) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5206 (Stafford Act), and implemented by 44 CFR § 206.35, I request that you declare an emergency for the State of Louisiana due to Hurricane Katrina for the time period beginning August 26, 2005, and continuing. The affected areas are all the southeastern parishes including the New Orleans Metropolitan area and the mid state Interstate I-49 corridor and northern parishes along the I-20 corridor that are accepting the thousands of citizens evacuating from the areas expecting to be flooded as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

In response to the situation I have taken appropriate action under State law and directed the execution of the State Emergency Plan on August 26, 2005 in accordance with Section 501 (a) of the Stafford Act. A State of Emergency has been issued for the State in order to support the evacuations of the coastal areas in accordance with our State Evacuation Plan and the remainder of the state to support the State Special Needs and Sheltering Plan.

Pursuant to 44 CFR § 206.35, I have determined that this incident is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and affected local governments, and that supplementary Federal assistance is necessary to save lives, protect property, public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster. I am specifically requesting emergency protective measures, direct Federal Assistance, Individual and Household Program (IHP) assistance, Special Needs Program assistance, and debris removal.

http://www.gov.state.la.us/Press_Release_detail.asp?id=976

Now here is section 501 of the Stafford Act:

PROCEDURE FOR DECLARATION {Sec. 501}

Request and declaration

All requests for a declaration by the President that an emergency exists shall be made by the Governor of the affected State. Such a request shall be based on a finding that the situation is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and the affected local governments and that Federal assistance is necessary. As a part of such request, and as a prerequisite to emergency assistance under this Act, the Governor shall take appropriate action under State law and direct execution of the State's emergency plan. The Governor shall furnish information describing the State and local efforts and resources which have been or will be used to alleviate the emergency, and will define the type and extent of Federal aid required. Based upon such Governor's request, the President may declare that an emergency exists.

Certain emergencies involving Federal primary responsibility

The President may exercise any authority vested in him by section 502 or section 503 <42 U.S.C. § 5192 or § 5193> with respect to an emergency when he determines that an emergency exists for which the primary responsibility for response rests with the United States because the emergency involves a subject area for which, under the Constitution or laws of the United States, the United States exercises exclusive or preeminent responsibility and authority. In determining whether or not such an emergency exists, the President shall consult the Governor of any affected State, if practicable. The President's determination may be made without regard to subsection (a).

(She did this and the President declared a state of emergency for Louisiana.)

The above references section 502:

Federal emergency assistance {Sec. 502}

a. Specified

In any emergency, the President may--

1. direct any Federal agency, with or without reimbursement, to utilize its authorities and the resources granted to it under Federal law (including personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, and managerial, technical and advisory services) in support of State and local emergency assistance efforts

2. to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, and lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe;

~snip~

General

Whenever the Federal assistance provided under subsection (a) with respect to an emergency is inadequate, the President may also provide assistance with respect to efforts to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, and lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe.

http://www.fema.gov/library/stafact.shtm#sec501

GOVERNOR BLANCO FOLLOWED THE LAW AND APPROPRIATE PROCEDURES IN ASKING BUSH FOR HELP ON SATURDAY, 8/27/05.


4. The Director of Homeland Security positioned assets in the area to be ready when the Governor called for them

TRY AGAIN!

WASHINGTON (AP): The government's disaster chief waited until hours after Hurricane Katrina had already struck the Gulf Coast before asking his boss to dispatch 1,000 Homeland Security employees to the region – and gave them two days to arrive, according to internal documents.

ONCE BUSH DECLARED A STATE OF EMERGENCY FOR LOUISIANA, IT BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FEMA! THE GOVERNOR'S LETTER TO BUSH ON 8/27/05 WAS ALL THAT WAS REQUIRED FOR FEMA TO COME IN!

5. "The President urged a mandatory evacuation, and even declared a disaster State of Emergency, freeing up millions of dollars of federal assistance, should the Governor decide to use it."

IT IS NOT UP TO THE GOVERNOR TO REQUEST IT. AFTER A STATE OF EMERGENCY WAS DECLARED BY BUSH, IT BECAME THE REPONSIBILITY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! EVER HEARD OF THE "NATION RESPONSE PLAN?"

http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0566.xml

BACKGROUND
The National Response Plan (NRP) applies 'to all Federal agencies that are requested to provide assistance" or are delegated responsibilities under the plan. The plan itself "establishes a comprehensive national all-hazards approach to domestic incident management across the spectrum of action including prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery."

On August 26, 2005, President Bush declared a "State of Emergency" in Louisiana. A day later he did the same for Mississippi. The hurricane hit on August 29, 2005. THREE DAYS LATER.

His declarations made Hurricane Katrina an "Incident of National Significance." The NRP defines an Incident of National Significance as: an actual or potential high-impact event that requires a coordinated and effective response by and appropriate combination of Federal, State, local, tribal, nongovernmental, and/or private-sector entities in order to save lives and minimize damage, and provide the basis for long-term community recovery and mitigation activities.

This categorization, as you will see, becomes CRITICAL as it imposes upon the President and his administration unique powers and responsibilities under the NRP. During that time, from the instant the Hurricane was labeled an "Incident of National Significance" until the second it made landfall, the President and his administration had THREE DAYS WORTH OF RESPONSIBILITY under the NRP. Their duty under the plan obviously still continues.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS

The "basic premise of the NRP is that incidents are generally handled at the state and local level." (NRP, 15). However, the plan specifically recognizes the possibility that the FEDERAL government bears primary responsibility: When an incident or potential incident is of such severity, magnitude, and/or complexity that it is considered an Incident of National Significance, the Secretary of Homeland Security initiates actions to prepare for, respond to, and recover from the incident." (NHP, 15)

Additionally, the NRP explicitly gives the President a fiduciary duty in the handling of a disaster: "The President leads the Nation in responding efficiently and ensuring the necessary resources are applied quickly and effectively to all Incidents of National Significance." (NHP, 15)

While the state and local officials then still have to try and implement their plans and coordinate with the feds, it is crystal clear that the NRP recognizes that when, say, a hurricane comes and wipes your city off the map, it is the President and his administration which MUST respond proactively.

BRINGING IN THE TROOPS
Much has been made of the fact that Governor Blanco refuses to hand over the state National Guard to the President. "Why didn't she request troops earlier" cry out the right wingers. But where does the NRP place the responsibility to request and/or deploy troops?

Deploying troops to a disaster scene, both pre and post incident, is called a "Defense Support of Civil Authorities" (DSCA). When and how is a DSCA authorized?

The cavalry is called up by the Secretary of Defense: The Secretary of Defense authorizes Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) for domestic incidents as directed by the President or when consistent with military readiness operations and appropriate under the circumstances and the law.

Now, generally, the DSCA will be deployed when requested by a Governor. (NRP, 42). But the plan states that the Secretary of Defense can deploy the troops under his imminent response authority. (NRP, 42).

Imminently serious conditions resulting from any civil emergency may require immediate action to save lives, prevent human suffering, or to mitigate property damage.

When such conditions exist and time does not permit approval from higher headquarters, local military commands and responsible officers from the DOD are authorized by DOD directive and pre-approved by the Secretary of Defense to take necessary action to response to the request of civil authorities. (NPR, 42)

Again, for three days before the hurricane hit, President Bush had the authority to direct Rumsfeld to deploy troops. Under the NRP, a formal request by the Governor is not necessary in these conditions. For three days before Katrina hit, and for FIVE Days afterwards, the President always had the authority to send in thousands of troops. The sole question that remains is...why didn't he do it earlier?

If there is one overarching theme of the NRP, it is that the federal response must be swift, efficient, and coordinated. Indeed, there is an ENTIRE SECTION of the NRP entitled "PROACTIVE FEDERAL RESPONSE TO CATASTROPHIC EVENTS." (NRP, 43).

Under that section, the plan provides that: "Standard procedures regarding requests for assistance may be expedited, or under extreme circumstances, suspended in the immediate aftermath of an event of catastrophic magnitude." (NRP, 44)

Yes, you read that right. This theory that the Federal Government has to sit on its ass and WAIT for Governors and Mayors to tearfully beg for assistance and issue S.O.S is pure fiction. The government has signed off on a promise to be PROACTIVE.

And what does the plan include under the federal proactive response to a catastrophic event? The "pre-identification of Federal assets and capabilities" and the "strategic location of pre-identified assets for rapid deployment" (NRP, 44).

This is what the plan requires from our federal government:

Federal departments and agencies are EXPECTED to provide:

initial and/or ongoing response, when warranted, under their own authority and funding;

alert, notification, pre-positioning and timely delivery of resources;

proactive support for catastrophic or potentially catastrophic incidents using protocols for expedited delivery of resources. (NRP, 6)

In the media and online, there is some confusion as to when Katrina became an "Incident of National Significance." Chertoff waited until Tuesday to declare the incident one of National Significance.

This is *extremely* important:

"ALL PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES UNDER THE STAFFORD ACT ARE CONSIDERED INCIDENTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE." (NRP, 7)

When President Bush declared Katrina a disaster, he EXPLICITY invokes Title V of the Stafford Act. Thus, Katrina became an Incident of National Significance on August 26, THREE DAYS before landfall, and FIVE DAYS before Chertoff mistakenly thought he had to declare it as such.

VOLUNTEERS UNDER THE NATIONAL RESPONSE PLAN
The NRP has an intricate network of teams which organize volunteer efforts by recognized volunteer organizations. (NRP, 11).

There are countless reported instances of FEMA turning away 500 volunteer boats, Walmart trucks filled with water, buses, etc.

Under Title 21, Section 1342 of the United States Code, the government cannot accept volunteer services. However, the statute provides an exception: "An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not accept voluntary services for either government or employ personal services exceeding that authorized by law except for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property."

The NRP itself addresses "unaffiliated volunteers," which are also called "emergent" or "spontaneous" volunteers. (NRP, 73).

There are statutory exceptions to the general statutory prohibition against accepting voluntary serices under 31 U.S.C. § 1342 (2002) that can be used to accept the assistance of volunteer workers. Such services may be accepted in “emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.” Additionally, provisions of the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5152(a), 5170a(2) (2002), authorize the President to, with their consent, use the personnel of private disaster relief organizations and to coordinate their activities.

In Incidents of National Significance, as in this case, the NRP calls on the Secretary of Homeland Security to "Attract a sizeable influx of independent, spontaneous volunteers and supplies." (NRP, 6).

"Atrract" spontaneous volunteers and supplies. Not turn them away.

There is a lot more in the National Response Plan, page after page describing how the Federal government should have acted. Michael Brown and FEMA failed America. But the criminal incompetence goes much, much higher. Michael Chertoff failed. Donald Rumsfeld failed. George W. Bush failed. It's all there in black and white. Page after page explicitly stating what they SHOULD have done.



"Oh and by the way, the levees that broke were the responsibility of the local landowners and the local levee board to maintain, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT."

FALSE!!

The Army Corps of Engineers is federally funded!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Where do I send the check to cover a couple of co-pays for your
physical therapy on your arm? Thank you very much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Dupe
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 11:08 AM by gatorboy
Doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Wow! You're a doll!
I just saw that little piece of work last night (The right wing talking points, not your stuff). Funny thing is, the guy tried to pass it off as his own. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC