Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

17th street levee bombed/9th ward deliberately sacrificed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:46 PM
Original message
17th street levee bombed/9th ward deliberately sacrificed?
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 09:00 PM by Carolab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. how does one selectively flood
certain neighborhoods?

All areas of New Orleans below lake-level were flooded. The areas above lake-level stayed dry. That's the way water works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. areas to one side of the breach were flooded, to the other side were not
I've seen the "purposely" theory more than once.

My mom, a bushco sympathiser despite her good sense, told me she suspected as much, but that "Dems and the unions" were behind it.

Recently she said she saw someone on GMA mention it.

And at the recent BIll Clinton/bush, sr. press conference, one reporter shouted that question as Clinton called the conference to a close.

If you buy into the 9*11 LIHOP, MIHOP scenarios, the same motivation could well exist here.

IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. but....
that's the way water flows.

It's as if you're saying you can fill a bowl with water, but leave some portions of the bottom dry. It's impossible, given that the neighborhoods are NOT separated from one another by levees or walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, for sweet Christ's sake.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. invite all the people and have hearing in court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is rediculous
I'm surprised it's not a WMR story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. uhh...let's nip this crap in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. too late
it's the new "no plane hit the pentagon" theory, and people will proclaim it loudly for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Ooof.
This story smells worse than the Superdome did, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not going to believe it unless and until there's hard proof
But I must admit, the thought has crossed my mind a few times in the past week and a half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Uhhhh, I'm not buying it. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. who might gain by spreading this rumor?
Why, GW Bush! Some unknown, perhaps terrists, group busting up the flood control lets him off the hook for shorting flood control projects. I see someone just posted about a barge doing it. So where's the barge?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Absofuckinglutely. I don't know a great deal about hydraulics
but the "barge" would not have burst the levy and then drifted away...

Rove is spinning shit like this. Actually, the Confederate Army mined the levy during the Civil War but mistakenly set the fuse to go off in the year 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Let's be discerning people.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. what about the Industrial canal levee? and the London Ave levee?
There were 2 breaks in the IC levee on the 29th that flooded the 9th ward first.

When the 17th levee went, Metarie and downtown were flooded, so prime real estate wasnt saved much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Ind. Canal was overtopped first. Also, I saw HUGE homes under water
on various video clips last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is free tinfoil for your hat territory. Enter at your own risk.
Repukes love to call people "crackpots"-it's in their playbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh please, there are GOOD REASONABLE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE LEVEE BREAKS
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM by jim3775
The primary source for this story (and i mean that literally) is an IM chat.

Well, if it's said in an IM chat it must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. There is an article from the Guardian on the list and I read it
It indicates that something did happen.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,69...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. No not bombed, but according to the Guardian
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 08:55 PM by DoYouEverWonder
One neighborhood was flooded deliberately.

September 4, 2005


Williams only left his apartment after the authorities took the decision to flood his district in an apparent attempt to sluice out some of the water that had submerged a neighbouring district. Like hundreds of others he had heard the news of the decision to flood his district on the radio. The authorities had given people in the district until 5pm on Tuesday to get out - after that they would open the floodgates.

'We thought we could live without electricity for a few weeks because we had food. But then they told us they were opening the floodgates,' said Arineatta Walker, who fled the area with her daughter and two grandchildren.

'So about two o'clock we went on to the streets and we asked the army, "Where can we go?". And they said, "Just take off because there's no one going to come back for you." They kicked my family out of there. If I knew how to hotwire a car I would have,' Walker said.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1562415,00.html

It would be interesting to find out more about what was going on here. Who were the 'authorities' that made this decision and why?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The Guardian is going insane lately. I'm starting to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Could you give an example?
I mostly check the BBC. I haven't looked at the Guardian much lately. They've always been reliable before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. This one...plus they reported no rapes/murders in the Dome in N.O.
despite eyewitness testimony describing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Did they say there were no rapes
or did they just not report them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. This Guardian article does report the rapes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. No way--this theory would benefit bush
These idiots just plain let NOLA drown because they didn't give a shit-- there was no thought whatsoever here IMO

Why would bush and cohorts want to save ANYTHING in that city?

IT'S BLUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cokie Roberts on Letterman
Last night Cokie Roberts was on Letterman. She talked about a multitude of alphabet agencies that preceded FEMA and she worked in one of the predecesors. Didn't she speak of a prior event where there was selective flooding in NO?

I am pretty sure I did not read it or I would have bookmarked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. I analyzed your sources and.. .. ... ... ........ ............
The first link

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/7/193317/1598
(a comment from a victim, unsupported)

The second link


http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2005/9/7/142315/5454/1...
(quotes the Guardian article below)


The third link has this statement:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,69...


"Williams only left his apartment after the authorities took the decision to flood his district in an apparent attempt to sluice out some of the water that had submerged a neighbouring district. Like hundreds of others he had heard the news of the decision to flood his district on the radio. The authorities had given people in the district until 5pm on Tuesday to get out - after that they would open the floodgates. "


This third source makes sense. Are there any WWLTV stories about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Anti-Psychotronic armor needed here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. total bullshit
The levees failed because of a record storm surge, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. First off, 9th Ward is all the way across town from 17th St.
two separate levees. Industrial (9th Ward) breached (was topped?) first, during the storm itself, hours before 17th St. breached.

Second, of course the Quarter, CBD and Uptown are on "high" ground. That's why they were built there. For much of New Orleans' history, the areas that flooded the worst, like the 9th Ward, were swamps.

But people like Clara Barthelemy -- and there are many -- will never believe that. And that damage to the social compact in New Orleans may be even harder to fix than the actual flood damage. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is ridiculous Art Bell stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. Locking...
This story is not verifed by
a reliable news source. The
Guardian article does not
mention bombing the levees.

If you find a story from
a reliable news source,
please feel free to post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC