Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't Weasly Little David Kay Jump on Scott Ritter's Claims ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:23 PM
Original message
Didn't Weasly Little David Kay Jump on Scott Ritter's Claims ?
that there were no WMDs in Iraq. It seems I recall that he was almost confrontational in his belief that Saddam had all those secret weapons. Now he comes slinking back into Washington to report that he found nothing in Iraq....but if they give him $600 million more, he might be able to find them in 6 more months? He gives some ambiguous reports of "evidence" of "intent", but really brings nothing back to put on the table.

Does anyone else remember his attitude toward Scott Ritter before he was chosen to go to Iraq? Now he comes back and George W Bush is more and more looking like a leader that took us to war on false premises. He lied and people died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ritter has done an interview with BBC's 'HardTalk'...
which is going to air on Monday. In a clip from it, he goes after David Kay 'big time', and points out that his WMD team was more effective on a budget of $30 million.

Ritter also raised a much-forgotten point in all of this: who mandated this "survey group"?? The UN? Nato? Nah - they're just a propaganda support team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love it when you say Weasely
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, I remember. He's a little weasal.
And now he wants what $600 million more and it will take 6-9 months? Gee, the timeframe sound VERY suspicious. 9 months, enough time to try to stall before the next election. Ain't gonna work Dr. Quack because are now showing that most people are questioning the fake war.

Also, if its going to take 600Mil and 6-9 months, could we have paid the other inspectors and given them the same amount of time? Oh, now I remember the BIG lie, SH is a grave threat; we must act now.

This entire debacle is the worst thing I have seen since Vietnam. Troops are dying daily, for what? For what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IggleDoer Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Take the $600 million out of RNC funds
At this point, only they stand to benefit from finding WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The $600 million will soon be RNC funds...
That is the point of every appropriation for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. i'm going to hear Scott Ritter Speak
on october 22 ...

my DU report to follow ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. WT2 - am so jealous. I really like Scott Ritter and have emailed
him a couple of times. You are so lucky. Do tell all afterwards.

I remember one of the last times I saw him speak, this was right before the "war" and he said that what the thugs would do was find some "omnious" parts and try to say they are the remains of the weapons (or something similar to that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes and scott said something about Kay only coming onto UN inspectors
team a few months before pulling out...and scott being there for what? 6 years...kay knew shit then and knows shit now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. They can't even find TRACES of the stuff!!!
Don't people get it? If you have produced 500 tons of sarin and VX gas, youo have TRACES of the shit laying about!
If you have 38 thousand litres of biological weaponry OR as Bush claimed, chemical weapons in war heads and issued to field commanders...There would be trace evidence.

Bush lied and hundreds of soldiers are dead who whoul be alive today.
thousands of soldiers are wounded who would not be so today.
Tens of thousands of Iraqis were murdered for a LIE.

When is the impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starpass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh, I do remember how this little bastard
was put on these shows to spit all over Scott but Scott would hit the slime right back in the face. I was just thinking the other day why these networks have never put Scott back on. HE WAS RIGHT---isn't it odd that they want to pretend that he doesn't exist?? I would love to see someone re-contact him. This Kay was a dishonorable slime who was dismissed before; now he's a "Team Bush" player. What garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC