Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Josh Marshall on Bush's increasingly dumbass statements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 11:48 AM
Original message
Josh Marshall on Bush's increasingly dumbass statements
Back in the day, Washington wags used to parse Bill Clinton's public utterances looking for various misstatements, lies, fibs, fudges, what have you.
Now we have President George W. Bush.
And with each passing day it seems his public statements show not so much a pattern of lies as evidence that when he's not doing press availabilities he's living on some other planet. Misstatements are becoming so par for the course that his public pronouncements now seem more and more like a verbal equivalent of what the immortal David St. Hubbins once called a "a free-form jazz exploration" in which the individual words aren't supposed to distract us from the larger truth the president is trying to convey.
Look at the president's final remarks from his press opportunity with Kofi Annan yesterday ...

The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did Saddam Hussein have a weapons program? And the answer is, absolutely. And we gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him from power, along with other nations, so as to make sure he was not a threat to the United States and our friends and allies in the region.
I mean, where do you start with this?
As the well-worn line goes, I think it's too soon to say we know Saddam didn't have a WMD program. I thought he did. There was lots of evidence to suggest he had at least some chemical and biological weapons programs. And we're still actively looking. But I think our inability thus far to find any clear evidence of a on-going chemical, biological or nuclear weapons program would seem to leave us at least a bit short of being "absolutely" certain that he had one. Am I nitpicking here?
Like the philandering husband, he seems to be asking us, "Who ya gonna believe? Me or your lying eyes?"
And remember when Saddam wouldn't let the inspectors in? I totally missed that one.
Look, you can certainly say that Saddam wasn't cooperating fully with the inspectors, that his people hadn't fully accounted for various chemical and biological munitions which the UN thought he had back in 1990s. Hans Blix said as much. It's true. But, c'mon, he let them in.
You hear this stuff and you say to yourself: "Well, you can kinda know what he meant, I guess."
The disquieting fact is that these whoppers aren't even getting reported any more because it's become a given among reporters and editors that most of what the president is saying on this subject has little connection to anything that's actually going on. And the two keep diverging more and more. It's almost as if the shakier the evidence gets the more certain he becomes about what the evidence was supposed to prove.

It's like the media knows Bush is a doofus they don't even bother reporting his embarrassing errors. It's such a double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treefrogjohn Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe that's the strategy
What better way to ease him out than by allowing him to be himself and so out of touch that it is embarrasing for the media to let anyone see. Sort of like the uncle no one wants to talk about. Now let's see if some other Repuke starts getting more and more exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's been getting a free ride for over two years
He is completely incompetent in addition to being corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's The Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnyhop Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm so sick of hearing about "weapons programs"
Of course iraq had one - all countries do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're hoping we just give up
The strategy must be making the lies too big and too many to keep up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sick of the term 'weapons programs'
Since when has a 'program' been an 'imminent threat' to any country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. FROM THE WHITEHOUSE ITSELF!
Edited on Tue Jul-15-03 01:52 PM by Kanzeon
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-3.html

The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did Saddam Hussein have a weapons program? And the answer is, absolutely. And we gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him from power, along with other nations, so as to make sure he was not a threat to the United States and our friends and allies in the region. I firmly believe the decisions we made will make America more secure and the world more peaceful.

You'd think they'd have scrubbed it by now.

But there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC