Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP PILES ON CHENEY: Iraq and 9/11 claims continue to be BOGUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:03 PM
Original message
WP PILES ON CHENEY: Iraq and 9/11 claims continue to be BOGUS
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:03 PM by sgr2
Kind of reminds me of those Direct TV commercials where Danny Devito reads some customers letter.

"LIES! ALL LIES!"


"I have this much credibility left"

http://msnbc.com/news/973241.asp?0cv=CA00

(snip)
WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 — In making the case for war against Iraq, Vice President Cheney has continued to suggest that an Iraqi intelligence agent met with a Sept. 11, 2001, hijacker five months before the attacks, even as the story was falling apart under scrutiny by the FBI, CIA and the foreign government that first made the allegation.

THE ALLEGED meeting in Prague between hijacker Mohamed Atta and Iraqi Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani was the single thread the administration has pointed to that might tie Iraq to the attacks. But as the Czech government distanced itself from its initial assertion and American investigators determined Atta was probably in the United States at the time of the meeting, other administration officials dropped the incident from their public statements about Iraq.
Not Cheney, who was the administration’s most vociferous advocate for going to war with Iraq. He brought up the connection between Atta and al-Ani again two weeks ago in an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in which he also suggested links between Iraq and the Sept. 11 attacks.
Cheney described Iraq as “the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11.” Neither the CIA nor the congressional joint inquiry that investigated the assault on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon found any evidence linking Iraq to the hijackers or the attacks. President Bush corrected Cheney’s statement several days later.




DRIP, DRIP, DRIP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Because the candidate civil wars are really just wasting everyone's fucking time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. What was Condi up to today on MTP?
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:12 PM by Stephanie
When this came up, she sounded like Cheney:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/973028.asp

<snip><RICE:> He was a threat. He is now gone. The goal now is to put in his place, in the place of that horrible regime, a stable, prosperous, and democratizing Iraq. That will pay off many, many, many times over in security for the American people. What happened to us on September 11th should remind us that we have to fight the war on terror on the offense. We can’t fight from preventive defense. It’s fine to try and defend the country, but the president believes that we have to fight this war on the offense and Iraq is part of fighting that war.

MR. RUSSERT: But Iraq was not part of September 11th.

DR. RICE: No. Saddam Hussein—no one has said that there is evidence that Saddam Hussein directed or controlled 9/11, but let’s be very clear, he had ties to al-Qaeda, he had al-Qaeda operatives who had operated out of Baghdad. The key, though, is that this is—our security is indivisible, and having a change in this region, in the center of the Middle East, is going to make a tremendous difference to our long-term security.<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. This all leads me to think the Plame story starts with Cheney
and I will be doing the happy dance if and hopefully when I get to see Cheney do the perp walk.

(in my dreams, I know...his heart will keep in out of jail, or some other such b.s.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is MSNBC same as WP? "WP PILES ON CHENEY"
If not, please cite WP article. Maybe I'm overlooking it. Eh? Does WP still mean Washington Post? Clean this thread up, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Uh, MSNBC carries material from the Washington Post (WP)
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:19 PM by sgr2
Click the link and see where the story came from.

By Dana Priest and Glenn Kessler
THE WASHINGTON POST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So does the Dallas Morning News
The citation was ambiguous, sorry.

Mac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lookeee-Lookeee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. SWEET
I love the cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry. It's late. I thought I was on a big-cock porn site
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:31 PM by DemoTex



That BIG, huh "Dick"?


(God I hate him!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't seem to bother him in 1998 when his company was
making profits by doing an end-around the US trade embargo.

Why would anyone believe anything this white collar criminal says is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC