Can anyone here tell me the effective difference in your right to vote between you being denied the right to vote and your vote being canceled out by a fraudulent vote?
for it to be large enough to effect the election it would have to be massive. someone has to actually cast that ballot two three, five ten, 50 times. if you vote that much, a poll worker might figure out something's fishy.
that it matters not at all if people vote who by law should not be voting?
My original point is the same. BOTH should be eliminated. EVERY eligible voter should be allowed to vote (once). . .and NO ineligible voter should be allowed to vote. In order to have clean elections, BOTH avenues should be pursued.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.