Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think Roberts was choosen to defend Rove, etc???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:08 PM
Original message
Do you think Roberts was choosen to defend Rove, etc???
I was thinking about this last nite. Roberts will be in the Supreme Court in Oct (most likely). This could also be the same time that Fitzgerald is finished with his investigation(s).

Could this all end up in front of the Supreme Court?
Afterall, an election was decided there.

Roberts could be bushco's sure bet that no one will be going to jail.

Any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. i have had the same thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very likely! Think of his stance on Cheney!
He is a party man and toe-the-line loyalist. His life experience is quite limited. He knows nothing of the lives of ordinary people. Too bad for most of America. Where has Thurgood Marshall gone? Is there no one left like him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's unlikely that
this criminal case will raise any constitutional issues that would have to go to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. great question...
i put nothing past these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well the guy
has been carrying the repukes' water for so long. He's simply a hack - no better than Thomas, Scalia, or Rehnquist.

So it certainly is a possibility. Then again, I doubt any justice Bush would have nominated would have done any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC