|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:07 AM Original message |
A serious question for those who want Roberts filibustered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. The election was stolen in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
157. man oh man, dear god. yes the election was rigged. but rigged or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #157 |
166. What?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #166 |
176. training for over throwing the government, because that is the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Roberts is NOT a mainstream conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Then who would be on the court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. There's no such thing as a mainstream conservative anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RememberWellstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
153. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. the election was a blatant fraud so Bush didn't win anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. You're fooling yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. They didn't block either Ginsburg or Breyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Ginsberg and Breyer are liberals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Orrin Hatch suggested Ginsburg's name... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danocrat (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. What Trotsky said/nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm Curious How You Would Define Ginsburg And Breyer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Ginsburg and Breyer are left-leaning moderates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:48 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Because There Are Degrees Of Liberalism.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 01:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
168. Interesting that you put Thomas to the right of Scalia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
159. damn those conservative bastard judges. I bet they eat meat too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
9. The country seems divided against him, at least in the latest polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. I don't think the candidate is a mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I Went To Bed Early Because I Knew The Choice Would Be Disappointing.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
13. Guess what? Clinton's nominees WERE blocked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:32 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It will all come out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. And in the meantime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. His Supreme Court Nominees Weren't Blocked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:18 AM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Because Orrin Hatch suggested them...learn some history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:24 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. He only suggested one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:34 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. No, Hatch suggested BOTH Breyer and Ginsburg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:58 AM Response to Reply #29 |
45. "Learn Some History..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Again, learn some history.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #50 |
83. Your Condescending Attitude Will Win You No Bonus Points With Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #83 |
147. No bonus points? Holy scalding shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #29 |
134. Yes, Orin Hatch is a source to be believed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #134 |
148. Suit yourself then....and roll over and play dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. On your specific charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:16 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. The plain fact is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:27 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Among other things Ginsburg had sued to overturn statutory rape laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Yeah? Where was that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:52 AM Response to Reply #40 |
77. as a general cousul of the ACLU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Unless you've got a date and a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DWolper (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:23 AM Response to Reply #81 |
135. Ginsburg/ACLU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #135 |
143. Nothing there about statutory rape...I think it's a right wing slur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:02 PM Response to Reply #143 |
151. I heard her being asked directly about his in confirmantion hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. Wow...that's certainly believable....NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:38 PM Response to Reply #154 |
165. Here is your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #165 |
167. So in other words your slur was horsecrap.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #167 |
171. What part of the laws were unconstitutional do you not understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:08 AM Response to Reply #34 |
46. This Is A Silly Picayune Debate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Says who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
94. Can you link the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #94 |
150. Hey, if you think Roberts is in the mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #150 |
158. First You Patronize Me Now You Are Bearing False Witness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. Boo-fucking-hoo.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #160 |
177. ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #94 |
155. elements of gay rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
175. true...the verdict didn't let torture victims COLLECT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryman814 (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #13 |
65. link to the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #65 |
84. Judge Smails could hardly have said it better.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. Of equal concern is the fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
20. Absolutely. The fillibuster is now required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:54 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Sorry but many of those people are precisely why we are in the mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Do you have a mouse in your pocket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:05 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Not in this mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renaissanceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. And what makes you think that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:53 AM Response to Reply #26 |
42. Your labeling of my statement as "bitching out" says it all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #42 |
67. I shouldn't have used the word bitching out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #67 |
75. Possibly because I was addressing the post I was addressing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. The post you just answered isn't directed to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. That would explain it then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
170. If you had actually made a point, I would have addressed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:28 AM Response to Reply #26 |
54. "bitching out a pro lifer" ??? Are you calling her a bitch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:47 AM Response to Reply #54 |
70. No I am not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:58 AM Response to Reply #70 |
85. "Before bitching out a pro lifer who voted for Kerry, you might, just ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #26 |
99. Can you provide a link to Robert's position on Lawerence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:13 AM Response to Reply #99 |
103. I have no idea, anymore than you have any idea of his position of Roe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #103 |
107. I guess I'd like to see his public opinion on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:24 AM Response to Reply #107 |
110. No he hasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:55 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Only women are in this mess? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:20 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. MJ, I'll gladly stand up for your reproductive rights, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:27 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Yes, you have better things to do, like insulting those who share your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:48 AM Response to Reply #53 |
71. Who do you identify as sharing my goals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:58 AM Response to Reply #71 |
86. You already identified the goals: reproductive rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowdance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #86 |
91. You believe that dsc shares those goals? read again...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. I saw nothing to indicate he did not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #93 |
97. In fairness I am pro life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:13 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Oh - well screw that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #97 |
108. Of COURSE you are! Finally the thread makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. I think it is ludricrous to accuse me of lying here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:38 AM Response to Reply #112 |
116. No, I did not... and WOW, what a stretch after claiming that you did not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:47 AM Response to Reply #116 |
119. Not only do I recall discussing abortion with you in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. LOL... OK... I'll admit I brushed right past that inference... since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #120 |
124. Incidently I never, not even one time, stated I didn't oppose Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:09 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. I didn't say you said that... but it does follow that you don't oppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #125 |
127. So should Democrats filibuster any and every thing to which they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #127 |
130. They should filibuster someone who would take away the rights of HALF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #130 |
136. and then when the reverse happens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #136 |
137. Somehow you trust republicans to treat us with deference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:36 AM Response to Reply #137 |
139. In the final analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Huh? They know that they reap what they sow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #141 |
149. How many SC nominees have been filibustered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:06 PM Response to Reply #149 |
156. Not enough.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #156 |
161. wasn't that after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:17 PM Response to Reply #161 |
163. Learn some history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 03:38 PM Response to Reply #163 |
172. Do you have a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #108 |
144. in fairness, misunderestimator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #144 |
146. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #146 |
162. i believe you didn't mean it to be read that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #144 |
164. I recall that now, but honestly didn't when I first read the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #164 |
169. the unmentionable one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #164 |
173. Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #173 |
174. It's not worth it to fight with an anti-choice man who doesn't give a flip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:31 AM Response to Reply #43 |
58. Women are the ones at risk of losing their civil rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:39 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Sorry - I didn't know he was anti-abortion but pro civil rights in every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. OF COURSE NOT. What are you arguing about anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Except HE is not on record on Roe v Wade - his CLIENT is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Again, I wonder what you are arguing about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #73 |
89. I think the process should be vigorous and we should see what we can turn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
23. If Roberts is "mainstream" then the stream is polluted with fascism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 07:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. what the Hell did you expect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:23 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. I AM bitching at them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
30. It would happen anyway. How many of Clinton's nominees never even made it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:28 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. all his Supreme Court nominees did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:35 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. And how many liberals were nominated and approved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:46 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. And how many of those who got blocked by the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
37. Pro-choice is by definition "mainstream" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RatRacer (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #37 |
145. Well, that depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
44. Whether I want it or not, they will filibuster if they can in the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
47. The Election was very close. Half the country can;t be ignored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
49. He IS a Bork, Thomas, Scalia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
52. When you become a woman and see your rights taken away... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:29 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Right - say that to a guy w/ a pink triangle avatar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Right, and suddenly I'm not GAY?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:34 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Then I'd expect you to know better than to say such things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:38 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Say WHAT things? He should be concerned about gay rights too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Oh sorry - now I don't support women's rights (despite the fact that I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:48 AM Response to Reply #63 |
72. I was talking about the OP, not you... unless you're saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:56 AM Response to Reply #72 |
82. I am gay. And I support abortion rights. But that doesn't mean I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #82 |
88. There may not be much chance of succeeding in the opposition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:05 AM Response to Reply #88 |
92. This is one front in the war - it is not the whole war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:08 AM Response to Reply #72 |
96. Have you heard of the Lawerence decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #96 |
98. All the more reason that this makes no sense to me at all that anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #98 |
105. What does "roll over" mean to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:17 AM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Rolling over is accepting the nominee without objection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:17 AM Response to Reply #106 |
128. Now we're getting somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #96 |
111. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:31 AM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Lawerence overturned Bowers which was only 17 years old at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:37 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. I Don't See It.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #115 |
133. There were many people denied rights due to sodomy laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #52 |
74. It isn't only women's rights at stake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:51 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. AND How many of those people are here on DU?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #76 |
90. reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:08 AM Response to Reply #90 |
95. You wrote this OP... so YOU are the one I'm addressing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #95 |
100. I notice you didn't address pro choicers who voted for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #100 |
104. No, I don't know any pro-choicers who voted for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #104 |
109. I don't mean literal edits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #109 |
113. Yeah, I got that... afterward... since I did NOT put words in anyone's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #113 |
117. Have you talked to any of the several gays and lesbians that lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:41 AM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Why do you keep up this argument... You never answer me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Because, in the future, when a democratic President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:02 AM Response to Reply #121 |
123. I think it would be enough to invoke a draft to convince people that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Actually I have stated repeatedly a draft might be just the thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #126 |
129. You didn't address why we are punishing women when the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Lawrence and Roe are inextricably linked, as are many other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #129 |
138. 2006 is immensly important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boredtodeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
55. The answer is so simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:37 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Great - how many dems do you think will filibuster this nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boredtodeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:45 AM Response to Reply #60 |
66. All of them but Joe Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Really? You REALLY think every dem but those 2 will filibuster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
78. The election was stolen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DistressedAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
87. Like Freeps Say, "Bush Won. Get Over It.! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Montauk6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
101. Your premise is flawed, sir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
122. I say filibuster the hell out of this. Three more years of pug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
131. hmmm....aren't you "pro-life?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #131 |
140. I am also gay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #140 |
142. no...i replied to your original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
152. Frankly, we need to fight anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC