TAE: Moral values are important to you. What do you think is the best way to teach them to children?
JONES: I think religion is the best way. If you are responsible to God, no matter what religion you are in, you learn moral standards that transcend the dictates of the law. You show your kids fundamentally what is right or wrong.
TAE: Should tort reform help curb frivolous lawsuits?
JONES: I think that is a very important goal. There was a recent $900 judgment against two teenagers in a Colorado suburb who baked cookies and dropped them off on the doorsteps of their neighbors at night out of sheer kindness. One of the neighbors claimed she got so frightened that there were intruders at her door that she had to go to the hospital the next day. And she sued these girls. Now, if that's not a sign of a system in distress, I don't know what is.
TAE: What are your thoughts on today's process for confirming federal judges?
JONES: It has deteriorated into trench warfare. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason in the strategy used by Democrats to oppose Republican nominees. The process has become absurdly destructive of people's character, and destructive of the public's view of the judiciary. Every time I think it can't get any worse, it does. The process is so contentious and unpleasant now that a lot of very fine people are discouraged from even attempting to apply. I believe that is part of the strategy of the opposition at this point.
Nominees are accused very unfairly of things that they didn't do. For someone like Judge Pickering to be called a racist is a vile lie. For someone like Judge Pryor to be attacked on the basis that he is a Catholic and therefore cannot judge cases fairly strikes at the heart of the notion of religious tolerance in our society. And the character assassination of Priscilla Owen reached unconscionable bounds.
TAE: What is the solution?
JONES: I do not see a real solution in the short term. The ultimate reason why the process is broken, in my view, is because the judiciary has gotten itself too enmeshed in making political judgments. Therefore the confirmation process, as Justice Scalia has pointed out, has become very similar to a political campaign. Until the judiciary rights its approach--until judges go back to interpreting law rather than making law and moral standards--I don't see the process becoming significantly less abrasive.
More:
http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.18525/article_detail.asp