Plames name not to be revealed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[BlueWolff]

According to sourse for WSJ....Now if those pigs are leaking this..Something must be up!


STATE DEPT. MEMO STATED PLAME'S ID CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT TO BE REVEALED

Memo Underscored Issue of Shielding Plame's Identity By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL July 19, 2005; Page A3

A classified State Department memo that may be pivotal to the CIA leak case made clear that information identifying an agent and her role in her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document.

http://www.dailykos.com/
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

1. Link please?

And if a Department memo specifically informed them that her name should NOT be revealed, that removes Rove's ignorance defense.

[wtmusic]

2. link? nt

[McCamy Taylor]

3. Oooooooooooo!

[wallwriter]

17. My thoughts exactly. That would be very big.

[geek tragedy]

4. Full text and link in another thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1939115

[montanacowboy]

5. Please link

[Just Me]

6. So, this is actually suppose to be on today's WSJ A3?

Anyone have login privileges to confirm the info?

[Viking12]

7. Confirmed.

[Just Me]

12. So, WSJ confirms the memo was "classified" rebutting another,...

,...W.H./GOP "talking point". Whomever laid eyes on that memo and converted the contents to leak Plame and the CIA operation is so indicted!!!

[Just Me]

13. Would you kindly post a bit of that,...

,...within the copyright restrictions, of course.

[Viking12]

15. See parallel thread....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1939115#1939151

[Just Me]

19. Fascinating. Thanks!!!

The memo is confirmed as "classified". That's the biggie:leaking classified info and/or converting the info from that doc. Good stuff!!

Knowing how this administration spins, my guess is they've gotten one of their spins (LIES) caught in the proverbial cookie jar.

Fun stuff!!!

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

8. In their world of newspeak, not reveal means must be revealed. ;-)

[aint_no_life_nowhere]

9. I wonder what the date on the memo is

Was it dated from before or after Rove's conversations with the media?

[ComerPerro]

10. Another memo indicated that bin Laden was determined to strike w/in the US

But they apparently didn't read it, either

[Al-CIAda]

11. 52 such memos pre 9/11, but thats another treason.

[Al-CIAda]

14. Article/blurb-

[RPM]

16. WSJ?!?!?! WTF?!?!?! WOW - you kno it must be bad when...

the folks at the WSJ are piling on and not toeing the party line.

ok - i believe that this is reaching critical mass when the WSJ will give it credence to the detriment of their GOP buddies... i'll be damned.

[NewJeffCT]

18. maybe it slipped through the cracks... WSJ also confirmed

Not long before the election, the WSJ also confirmed that we let Osama slip through our fingers at Tora Bora due to us hiring Afghan mercs...

Of course, that story didn't make big waves, either.