Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Terrorist Eric Rudolph Reveals Motives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:54 AM
Original message
Conservative Terrorist Eric Rudolph Reveals Motives
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/13/eric.rudolph/index.html

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Revealing his motives for the first time, Eric Robert Rudolph blames the death and violence behind the four bombings he's confessed to in Georgia and Alabama on the legalization of abortion and "aberrant sexual behavior."

The attacks, which occurred between 1996 and 1998, killed two people and wounded more than 110 people.

Rudolph issued a rambling 11-page statement Wednesday after pleading guilty in Alabama and Georgia, declaring: "Abortion is murder. And when the regime in Washington legalized, sanctioned and legitimized this practice, they forfeited their legitimacy and moral authority to govern." (Read excerpts)

SNIP

In his statement Wednesday, he said that while homosexuality does not pose a threat when kept in private, the "attempt to force society to accept and recognize this behavior" should be met with "force if necessary."

Sound like anyone we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like pretty much every Republican around...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "It's fine as long as you keep it to yourself..."
Yeah, sounds like a whole BUNCH of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Those people don't know their place"....
Yeah, Rudolph fits right in....what a shame he's got legal problems, or he might make a fine Supreme Court nominee...or replacement for Karl Rove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. He sounds like a folk hero
for "focus on the family" and other wing nut groups. His views are pretty much what they want in a Supreme Court nominee. I expect they will push for an Eric Rudolph lite; you know, somebody that has same beliefs but hasn't bombed anybody just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Pin-up boy for the American Taliban...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, and I read yesterday that the Pubs are saying he did the right thing!
Many believe that killing Dr's, nurses, and patients at abortion clinics is a justified action!

Of course, I think they're nuts, but they never explain why they don't view capital punishment the same way! Isn't that murder too? How about "collateral damage"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. And when a regime in Washington legalizes, sanctions and legitimizes
certain actions which result in mass deaths, one wonders if Mr. Rudolph and all true believers think that regime has forfeited its legitimacy and moral authority to govern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. i like the term "christian extremist"
conservative terrorist is good too;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. How About "Radical Christian Terrorist"?
Sort of combines both ideas.

And, the logic is this, as i read it: Because we're killing people, we fix it by killing people. OK?!?!?

Yet, since he's mad at Washington, and thinks force is necessary, he didn't go to Washington D.C. and take it directly to the gov't. He went commando on unsuspecting people not directly responsible for the decisions. There's a common word for this: COWARDICE!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Radical right wing terrorist
fits the bill. We need a nice % of the Christian vote to win, so calling him names (however accurate) that offend the over sensitive might not be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. They're Not Retrievable Anyway
Those that would be offended by calling a killer a bad name are those we will never convince to shed the repubs if the repubs were a colony of fleas.

That sort of hypersensitivity is something i think we should just ignore.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. It not calling a killer bad names
so much as it associating a despised national figure with their religion. Since I moved to North Carolina (from Chicago) I've learned a little bit about how hypersensitive run of the mill southern Christians can be about about their religion. When I was going door to door before the last election - mainly to people that were registered Democrats, the number of questions I had to answer about the religious implications of supporting Democrats was staggering. I've come to believe that any realistic Democratic strategy for winning in the south has to involve toning down comments that offend hypersensitive southern Christians. They are a long way from being un-retrievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. But, Isn't It True?
Isn't he the one who professes to be driven by Christian motives? I don't see how we alienate anybody who is persuadable, by telling the truth. Maybe i'm missing something.

How can a retrievable southern christian be offended by hearing the truth?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. DAMN YOU PROFESSOR GAC!
This time you beat me by 3 minutes, and used a whole heck of a lot fewer words, too.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Mea Culpa, MB!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Blast!
Victory shall be mine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Oh, it's true alright
I'm just thinking in terms of what is lost and what is gained politically. We are not talking about a group of PH-D's here, nor am I addressing all southerns universally. To me, this about getting folks that used to vote Democrat to do so again. They don't want to hear the truth - that much is obvious (they are voting Republican after all). I say, why grind their faces in truths they don't want - why throw away votes. Do we gain something by doing that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I've lived here for 10 years
Any comments other than the straight-line "the Bible is the literal word of an angry white male God" is going to offend the hypersensitive. That's why they're called hypersensitive in the first place. The Repugs have managed to so successfully conflate Xianity with their party that even the ministers preach the GOP from their pulpits. We have to win the reasonable heart of the south before we can reach the freaky-deaky fringes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Anyone that takes offense on behalf of Eric Rudolph...
...isn't voting Dem anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. GMTA, Modem!
My post says the exact same thing.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Article doesn't mention "terrorism" or "terror" or "terrorist."
Ah, right, Rudolph is White.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. of course his mother is an ex-nun...filled his developing brain with ....
with all that crap....pounded it into his tender soul and destroyed him and others...she will have to answer for it too!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you Eric for attempting to save us from ourselves.
:sarcasm:

Let's see what gets forced on you in prison.

Rot away, you miserable bastid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. ChristoFasicsts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. What's his Freeper handle?
scumbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. onward Fascist Fundies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. So he admits he hates us for our freedoms.
Quite literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC