Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many study results fail to hold up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:22 PM
Original message
Many study results fail to hold up
Los Angeles Daily News

Many study results fail to hold up
By Associated Press

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 - CHICAGO -- Here's some medical news you can trust: A new study confirms that what doctors once said was good for you often turns out to be bad -- or at least not as great as initially thought.

The report is a review of major studies published in three influential medical journals between 1990 and 2003, including 45 highly publicized studies that initially claimed a drug or other treatment worked.

Subsequent research contradicted results of seven studies -- 16 percent -- and reported weaker results for seven others, an additional 16 percent. That means nearly one-third of the original results did not hold up, according to the study in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.

(snip)

Experts say the study is a reminder to doctors and patients that they should not put too much stock in a single study and understand that treatments often become obsolete with medical advances.

(snip)

Ioannidis' study examined research in the New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet and JAMA.

http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2962242,00.html#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whenever I hear about the conclusions of a new study
My first question is "Who paid for it?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe this study is wrong, too.
"Ioannidis acknowledged an important but not very reassuring caveat: 'There's no proof that the subsequent studies ... were necessarily correct.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. so true, like the new phones and driving study
Everybody in MSM is blathering endless about the new cell phones while driving study that "allegedly" shows that talking on the phone is dangerous even when using a headset because "just the act of having a conversation is too distracting."

Puh-leeeeeeeeeeeze. Drivers have been having conversations while driving since the Model T. What a bunch of absolute hooey.

When are they going to do a study showing how many "accidents" are caused by people failing to stop at stop signs and obey traffic signals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC