Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC report on Iran with Reagan-era official just freaked me out!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 04:56 PM
Original message
BBC report on Iran with Reagan-era official just freaked me out!
Edited on Sat Jun-25-05 04:58 PM by Gloria
I tuned in at around 3 pm on shortwave and heard a report on the Iranian election. They interviewed this guy and when I heard he had been a Reagan official I looked him up....(below)

This is what he said: This election flies in the face of "democracy" which is "sweeping" the region. The turnout was really only 15% and the winner got 60% of that. He expects diplomacy via the EU3 to continue and the US will continue to join in, but it will fail. The US will prepare for air strikes, but won't go ahead with them. The race is on to prevent the Iranian nukes to proceed successfully before regime change. The only way to effect regime change is to take the MEK off the terrorist list and help them overthrow the Iranian regime.

There you have it. My biggest fear is that our illustrious Dems go along with this, including loud-mouth Biden....


http://explore.georgetown.edu/faculty/index.cfm?Action=View&NetID=rt54
Raymond Tanter
Title(s) Primary title: Visiting Professor
Other titles: Visiting Researcher
Phone
Work: 202-687-8217
Fax: 202-333-4126
Email
Work: rt54@georgetown.edu
Alternate: rtanter@umich.edu
Location 511 ICC
Office hours W, Noon-1:00 pm
Bio Raymond Tanter served on the senior staff of the National Security Council and as personal representative of the Secretary of Defense to arms control talks in Europe in the Reagan-Bush administration. He teaches Terrorism and Proliferation as well as an introductory course on International Relations in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown. Tanter is also Visiting Researcher in the Government Department, conducting academic research on "bounded rationality" in foreign policy decisionmaking. His research compares rational choice and prospect theory as complementary explanations of U.S. decisions regarding Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. He is Adjunct Scholar at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, carrying out policy research on Iran and Iraq. He wrote Classifying Evil: Bush Administration Rhetoric and Policy toward Rogue Regimes and Rogue Regimes: Terrorism and Proliferation, which includes chapters on Iran, Iraq, and freelance terrorists who operate in a borderless world of failed states like Afghanistan. He also coauthored Balancing in the Balkans, as well as Rational Decisionmaking: Israel's Choices.
Web site http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/rt54/Public/
Education
� Ph D (1964) Indiana University, Political Science

Note: Website is not available to general public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm kicking before this sinks....it's more impt. than Tom Cruise....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know where his turnout of 15% came from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Kick
Wow, this is big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He said the ministry in charge of the info wasn't "reliable" and
that the 60% turnout wasn't true, it was 15%!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh you mean they don't like election fraud?
Gee who'd have thunk it, I mean gee? :shrug: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC