Janak Patel Aug 9 1999, 3:00 am show options
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
From: Janak Patel <p...@crhc.uiuc.edu>
Date: 1999/08/09
Subject: U.S. Congress on India
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
< BurtonAug2.txt >
From the Record of 106th U.S. Congress - August 2, 1999.
This is an abbreviated transcript. For full transcript please visit:
http://www.congress.gov/ and follow the links "most recent record" and then "August 2 house"
and then "FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING, AND RELATED PROGRAMS
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2000 (House of Representatives - August 02, 1999)" and then search for Mr. Burton.
AMENDMENT OFFERED BY MR. BURTON
"Of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act in title II under the heading `development assistance', not more than $33,500,000 may be made available to the Government of India."
Mr. BURTON of Indiana:
Mr. Chairman, our foreign policy in our country has been concerned about human rights violations around the world for a long time. However, Mr. Chairman, we have been concerned about human rights around the world on a very selective basis in this country.
. . .
Amnesty International, another human rights group says, `Torture, including rape and ill-treatment continue to be endemic throughout the country.' This is in their annual report, 1999. `Disappearances continue to be reported during the year, predominantly in Punjab and Kashmir,' 1999. `Hundreds of extrajudicial killings and executions were reported in many states, including Kashmir and Punjab,' 1999, this year.
I talk about this year after year after year. My colleagues who defend India's government policies keep coming down saying, `Oh, well, it is a big country, the second biggest in the world. We have to keep those economic doors open. We have got to make sure that we do business with them.'
Well, okay, let us do business with them, but let us at least send them a signal, send a little-bitty signal to them that these kinds of atrocities cannot be tolerated, should not be tolerated. $11 million cut from our foreign aid to India is a drop in the bucket. They are getting foreign aid from all over the world. So if we cut them by a mere $11 million, one-fourth of the developmental aid we are going to give them, to send a little signal that they should stop these human rights abuses, is that wrong? I think not.
***
Here's the "tie-in" - the responses against his proposed amendment that specifically cites..........
* The U.S. is India's largest trading partner and largest investor. U.S. direct investment has grown from $500 million per year in 1991 to $12 billion in 1998. Despite the collapse of various economies in
Southeast Asia over the last two years, the Indian economy continued
to grow at a rate of 6% in 1998. In the first half of 1999, new foreign investment in India totaled $600 million.
* Many large American companies have invested in India and opened plants and offices there. More than 100 of the U.S. Fortune 500 have invested in India. Among those companies are General Electric, Boeing, AT&T, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Ford Motor Company, Microsoft, IBM, Coca Cola, Pepsico, Eli Lilly, Merrill Lynch, McDonnell Douglas, US West, Bell Atlantic, Sprint, Raytheon, Motorola, Amoco, Hughes, Mobil, and Enron.