Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Will Happen First? Same-Sex Marriage, or Decriminalizing Marijuana?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:25 AM
Original message
Poll question: Which Will Happen First? Same-Sex Marriage, or Decriminalizing Marijuana?
More specifically, which will happen first 1) "complete state and federal recognition of all benefits, responsibilities, protections and privileges associated with same-sex marriages" or 2) "complete and full decriminalizing of ALL marijuana use" (not just for medical purposes).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadAsHellNewYorker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow, thats a really good question
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 09:26 AM by MadAsHellNewYorker
and i have no idea :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Option #3: Neither one in our lifetimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I th ink . . .
. . . .legal marijuana, for medical use in patients with intractable pain only; certainly not for recreational use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dez Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Gay marriage will come first
there is no stake in the matter from corporations to keep it being illegal, as with cannabis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good point, Dez...
but I agree with another post that neither will happen in this country, in our lifetimes and probably never. The utterly ludicrous arguments for keeping drugs illegal (except of course the ones that have killed the most, alcohol and tobacco) will be passed on among fundies for generations to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think that was the question.
I disagree. It's hypocritical for cigarettes and alchohol to be legal while marijuana isn't. I think almost anyone who has tried marijuana and alchohol will tell you, alchohol is much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm going to say gay marriage
but only because of economics. Homosexuals make money just like everyone else - and most of their households end up being DINKs (Dual-Income, No Kids). That translates into more disposable cash, and businesses want business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Legal Gay Marijuana
Just cause
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Clever
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Gay marriage
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 09:49 AM by personman
I think more dems are more willing to fight harder for gay marriage. I'm not gay and I'm pro gay marriage, where all the non-potheads who are willing to help a brother out with marijuana legalization?

Edit: Also I feel intolerance is becomming more and more obsolete (it always has been but intolerance of intolerance is becomming more mainstream), and probably 60 years from now, people will look at anti-gay-marriage people the way we look at racists today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dez Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's not up to pot smokers to change the laws.
The pot laws wont be changed cause there is too much to lose, for the corporations. It just will never happen. Big money runs this country, and it always will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Seems like defending weed
is too easily villainized by people who don't know what they're talking about. The slippery-slope argument is ingrained in people as far as "gateway drugs."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. How 'bout "hell freezing over"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'd say weed.....
because of the potential for taxation. Talk about a cash cow - if weed production were subsidized and taxed as heavy as tobacco.... Some accurate projections of the potential dollars would get those congressmen drooling!
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Money to be made with same-sex marriage, money to be lost with legal mj
therefore same-sex marriage will come first.

A lot of people make money off weddings.

A cheap and easily grown alternative to some expensive medicines would not make pharm. companies happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Mary Jane
"Smoking a bone" (marijuana) will not be decried as being "against the Bible." The other kind...well, we know how that argument goes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. It could also be argued that Jesus used cannabis


Was Jesus a Stoner? is the mischievous title of an article about the use of cannabis in ancient Judaism in next month's High Times, a pro-cannabis magazine. Its author, Chris Bennett, likes to shock. He is the host of Burning Shiva, a show on Canada's Pot-TV, and an advocate for the medical use and decriminalisation of marijuana.

http://www.cannabis.net/articles/jesus-cannabis.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. i will not live to see pot legalized
i'm 41

i figure i'm about halfway.

so, 2046. no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's The Way I Feel Too. By The Time Same-Sex Marriage Is Legal...
... and recognized in all 50 states, either I or my partner will be dead or too old to care anymore.

We look back in amazement that 40 years ago, interracial marriage was ILLEGAL in many states. In another 40 years, I hope that people will also be shaking their collective heads in amazement (and hanging them in collective shame) when they talk about how same-sex marriage USED TO BE illegal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. pot will be legal first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Where's the "Hell Freezing Over" option?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiddenInVA Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Unfortunately...
I think that you're probably right for both....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. LGM, The CIA (Iran-Contra) isn't going to get up off the dope money. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can I just say "Don't hold your breath" on either issue
as long as the Bush dynasty remains in absolute power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC