Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As Bolton Prepares To Exit, Right-Wing Hawk's Point Man Takes His Place

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:30 AM
Original message
As Bolton Prepares To Exit, Right-Wing Hawk's Point Man Takes His Place

US nuclear warrior takes the helm
By Tom Barry

The top US government official now in charge of arms control advocates the offensive use of nuclear weapons and has deep roots in the militarist political camp. Moving into the job of John Bolton, the administration's hardcore unilateralist nominee to be the next US ambassador to the United Nations, Robert G Joseph is the right-wing's advance man for counterproliferation as the conceptual core of a new US military policy.

Within the George W Bush administration, Joseph leads a band of counterproliferationists who - working closely with such militarist policy institutes as the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP) and the Center for Security Policy (CSP) - have placed preemptive attacks and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) at the center of US national security strategy.

>>>>Joseph and other hardline strategists advocated large increases in military spending to counter these threats, while paying little or no attention to warnings that the most likely attack on the United States and its armed forces abroad would come from non-state terrorist networks.

Instead of advocating improved intelligence on such terrorist networks as al-Qaeda, which had an established record of attacking the US, militarist policy institutes such as the NIPP and CSP focused almost exclusively on proposals for high-tech, high-priced items such as space weapons, missile defense and nuclear weapons development.

Joseph participated as a team member in crafting the influential 2001 report by the NIPP titled "Rationale and Requirements for US Nuclear Forces and Arms Control". The report recommended that the US government develop a new generation of "usable" lower-yield nuclear arms. The NIPP study served as the blueprint for Bush's controversial Nuclear Posture Review.

full story:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GF16Aa01.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh yay! They had to go get someone worse....
Are we seriously living in a country dominated by crazy fundamentalists?!??? :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

This guy Joseph is, well, about 5 times as bad as Bolton....When the going gets tough, the tough gets going :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of a bevy of military industrial warriors nested in the administration
Our foreign policy is dictated by folks who have large money interests in the military industry. It's no accident that we are now forced to argue down Bush's call for a new generation of nuclear weaponry. This bunch was installed to hijack our hard earned contributions to democracy for their own ambitions for power, greed, and world military dominance.

Whack-a-mole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He looks like a clone of Bolton...
Maybe they had to throw everyone off the Bolton smell trail....

Because John Bolton was in PNAC, broke the law, and is going to be sent to a prison.......Sad times on capital hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. We aren't going to get anybody we like
The main goal of these hearings has to be, in part, to have a serious debate on what our foriegn policy should be. Should be a mean spirited angry belligerent nation? Or should we be a good neighbor?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We have to continue to expose the members of the Bush crime family
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 09:05 AM by bigtree

They hide behind their appointed offices and subvert the will of Americans and the constitution with their mindless warmongering for the profits of their military industry benefactors, like Lockheed, Raytheon, General Electric, Boeing . . . There is no honest debate being sought by the principals that Bush has elevated to these positions of negotiation, just volleying from the hawks to place their cog in whatever vehicle furthers their military money machines.

There will be no honest or meaningful negotiation or debate until we change regimes. This one is dangerously false and functionally corrupt. We may not prevail, but I'll not be caught idle while they scheme to destroy our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Know Your BFEE.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 11:37 AM by Karenina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. perfect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC