Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bobby Eberle says 'Downing Street' Memo Has Left Wingers Drooling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:45 PM
Original message
Bobby Eberle says 'Downing Street' Memo Has Left Wingers Drooling
Well -- I guess we know what the GOP is going to hit us with.


If there's one thing left wingers love, it's a good, old-fashioned conspiracy. Give them a small nibble of a "claim" of wrong doing against the current White House, conservatives, or Republicans, and the left wing fringe will pounce into action. Facts? Data? Evidence? Those items are simply minor inconveniences to their "analysis" of right wing efforts to rule the world, steal elections, plant White House reporters, or a host of other perceived dirty deeds.

Like chum in a pool of sharks, the left has been stirred into a frenzy over the so-called "Downing Street" memo. This document, written by a British foreign policy official, chronicles a meeting among British officials including Prime Minister Tony Blair. The memo conveys a sense of the direction America was heading in regard to dealing with Saddam Hussein and Iraq, prior to the commencement of military operations. The memo contains a passage that the left is now calling the "smoking gun" that they say shows President Bush purposely manipulated intelligence information to build the case for war. Once again, the left wing zealots are putting facts and evidence aside and letting their conspiracy theory fears run wild.


More if you can stomach it: http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/bobby/2005/bobby_06131.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read enough....
I definitely cannot stomach another word of that swill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Bob - Over a dozen CIA analysts said intel books were being cooked
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 06:50 PM by blm
as far back as Oct 2002 (KRT report by Landay and Strobel) and they said it was the White House doing the cooking. You want to go on record as saying all those analysts were lying, Bobby boy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. The conspiracy part is wrong
it isn't us who has the ct, we are uncovering THEIR conspiracy to take us to war. They conspired to blame Iraq for 9-11 and they planned an illegal war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is wonderful!
The kernel of truth, in whatever vehicle, is being repeated in the very heart of the empire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. No one has denied the facts of the memo.
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 06:51 PM by Postman
Why would someone write on paper "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" if not meant to manipulate the facts?

Why wouldn't the policy be fixed around the facts and intelligence?

Because the facts, as they were, didn't fit the agenda (policy) of the neo-con PNAC criminals.

"fixed around" is a term indicating cherry-picking intelligence. Can you say (OSP) Office of Special Plans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's interesting that they're even addressing this.
GOOD! Perhaps if they look at the DSM long enough, they'll see they were also duped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC