Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush admin flunks Econ 101 on Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 01:39 PM
Original message
The Bush admin flunks Econ 101 on Social Security
There is this thing called "Loss Aversion" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion)

that makes people more wary of losses than they are hungry for gains. So, basically, offering someone the choice of losing the sure thing of current benefits v the risk involved in privitizing SS is a guarenteed non starter.

I know that and Im an idiot. It is hard to believe that there isn't a single economist working in the White House.

Well, it isn't actually very hard to believe, I was just being coy.


'''To illustrate, consider Kahneman & Tversky's 1984 study where they asked a representative sample of physicians the following question. Read and answer it before you continue.

Imagine that the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows: If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved. Which of the two programs would you favor?
http://www.workingpsychology.com/lossaver.html'''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. What they get out of their planned changes to SS is more people
dependent on the markets like rich people - ergo - more kool-aid drinkers who will say "oh to hell with the little people - lets bully & invade Venezuela, Nigeria, ME, etc...because I want my stocks to go up.

Plus it phonied pumps up the market so that for a while the market keeps rolling. And the recession we need to adjust to 'how the world is changed' can keep being put off.

Need a boom? Forget domestic spending..lets go to war.

Making sense as a security plan... a shared policy to spread the risk of not having enough to retire on..has nothing to do with it!!!

It is never about clean air, or social security. It is always about the neocon agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC