Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House "takes exception" to the report today on Postwar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:29 PM
Original message
The White House "takes exception" to the report today on Postwar
Well, Well, Well......so sorry. The truth will come back and bite ya in the arse!!!!!!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050613/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_iraq;_ylt=Ai.H72s7yOmoCtwPeyXpauWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2MTQ3MTFjBHNlYwN0cw--

WASHINGTON - The White House took exception Sunday to the reported characterization of a British memo questioning the adequacy of U.S. planning for a postwar occupation of Iraq.

"There was significant post war planning," said spokesman David Almacy. "More importantly, the memo in question was written eight months before the war began; there was significant post war planning in the time that elapsed."

He was reacting a report in Sunday editions of The Washington Post that a staff paper prepared for British Prime Minister Tony Blair before the invasion of Iraq concluded that "a post-war occupation of Iraq could lead to a protracted and costly nation-building exercise" that could result in the United States looking to Britain "to share a disproportionate share of the burden."

more>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. so that means war plans were on his desk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would say that is a CONFIRMATION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Dum dum dum
Looks like they just did a 180. First he wasn't even thinking about going to war before the UN ordeal and now he was? Which is it?! (Of course we all know)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Read on....
"Some things we prepared for did not happen, like large numbers of refugees needing humanitarian assistance, and others we did not expect, such as large numbers of regime elements fleeing the battlefield only to return later," said Almacy. "Anytime you go to war you have to be flexible to adapt to the unexpected. That is why we gave our commanders the flexibility to do so."
....................................................

What a joke!!! Were we not all saying these things would happen....to the tone of "Your un-American"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Lets continue the list
their list
1. "large number of refugees needing humanitarian assistance"
2. "large number of regime elements fleeing the battle field only to return later"

our list

3. safeguarding the high explosives weapons dumps
4. safeguarding the museums of 5,000 years of culture
5. safeguarding the 9 billion dollars that is now missing
6. plan on leaving iraq..... they already said they didn't have a" exit plan but a winning plan"
7. plan on supplying what our troops needed
8. plan on......... I'm getting tired typing.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TerdlowSmedley Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's amazing how even those in cahoots with the evil asshats in
the White House persist in making up unflattering things about them. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Significant: Having or expressing a meaning; meaningful."
So the word means what the speaker wants it to mean.

Whoo-eee, that bullshit is really pungent today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. So they admit they were planning on going to Iraq way back then.
Now were getting somewhere.

"There was significant post war planning," said spokesman David Almacy. "More importantly, the memo in question was written eight months before the war began; there was significant post war planning in the time that elapsed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too bad they didn't implement their....
..."post war planning." Most of their "planning" consisted of taking interns from the various right-wing think tanks and giving them a task such as, oh, building an Iraqi stock market. Yeah, I want a 23-year old moron doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. My favorite part...
"More importantly, the memo in question was written eight months before the war began; there was significant post war planning in the time that elapsed."

So, you were plannin to go there all along, weren't ya?

Here's my take on the Memo, it's a "smoking gun" absolutely, but I don't think it's worthy of impeachment outright, and here's why. The memo said they were "fixing intelligence" to make a cause for the war, and that's damnable but only if they knew that it was false intelligence. What we really need is some document showing some highup in the administration giving orders for the intelligence to be fixed. Bush and the gang are right about making plans not being that bad, you always make plans, they wanted to sell their idea to the UN so of course they were going to come up with estimates on troops and cost, strategic planning of sorts, I would expect them too, I don't want our guys flying in unprepared. BUT, if they couldn't get any proof, and the order came down to drag whatever they could from intelligence and satellite photos to make a "case" for the war, then they're war criminals (I know this is the how it actually went down, we just don't have enough proof yet, only motive).

That being said, if we have to impeach to obtain those documents, then I'm all for it! :D

Viva La revolution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC