Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I USED TO like Bill Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:53 PM
Original message
I USED TO like Bill Clinton
Then I read this:

GOOD EVENING. I know ... you're thinking somebody put the wrong video in the machine. It's kind of like the time somebody put the wrong State of the Union speech in my teleprompter. But it really is me, and I am really here to pay tribute to Roger Ailes!"

That's part of former President Clinton's videotaped message to be played tonight when the Jewish Community Relations Council honors Ailes at the Pierre Hotel. Ailes - like Clinton - has been a great supporter of the state of Israel and works to bring peace to the Middle East.

Clinton added: "I am especially grateful that Roger didn't work in the 1992 campaign. I mean, who knows how different history would have been if he had. I would have been spared all of his barbs in his later life as a media mogul, but I wouldn't have had the chance to be president."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/features/lifestyle/bal-to.liz09jun09,1,1695022.story?coll=bal-artslife-today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Looks like Hillary is running in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. sorry bro, gotta take you to task on that statement
as it seems you are absolving him with "that's politics."

Clinton was on that stage honoring not only one of Nixon's dirty tricksters, but someone whose claim to fame was character assassination and treating him as though he was simply an accomplished man doing a legitimate job. Clinton GRANTED credibility to all the smut directed toward HIMSELF over the past 12 years in doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Great call
My sentiments exactly. Ailes is more evil than Rove, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. and he undercut an enemy in doing so
Ailes and the Repubs treated the whole smear campaign as a righteous crusade against a wicked man. Clinton just reduced it to a campaign game played between adversaries. By graciously praising his rival, he undercuts the moral outrage Ailes pretended to feel, and makes it all just a game of tactics. Ailes is reduced, Clinton elevated. When you praise an enemy, you give the appearance of camaraderie, and everything that enemy does after that looks less significant.

You want Clinton to either ignore Ailes or rain fire and brimstone upon his head. That's never been Clinton's style, and it wouldn't stop Ailes or people like him, anyway. Clinton's revenge is winning. He would have made a good Sicilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. No, he really didn't. The next time Fox is taken to task for their bias
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 03:34 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
and complicity in things such as 8 years of investigating the Clintons and their pro war coverage void of facts along with their justifications of Watergate and what a treasonous bastard Mark Felt is, they will play Clinton's speech and say, "How bad can Ailes be? even Bill Clinton honored him!" When Hillary runs and Fox SKEWERS her, they will play this tape of Clinton pretending Ailes was only "doing his job" (no matter how unethical that job was) and say that even Clinton agrees with their tactics and condones them.
Now, if Ailes were to be found at the bottom of the Potomac, you might have good cause for claiming Clinton was a "good Sicilian."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. They won't play that tape
To do so what be to elevate Clinton, to give him respect, to show that they value his opinion. That would only help Hillary Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I think they WILL play it
Their agenda is more focused on making us liberals look bad than on promoting their own RW viewpoints. And they think Bill is our god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. We shall see
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. I agree.
100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I agree with your assessment
No sense pissing them off now--far better to lure them, lull them, and put them in a position where they will look like total jerks if they suddenly turn on him, or his missus. Let others take the heat, develop a strategy of triangulation, and that makes it THAT MUCH HARDER for the GOP to go for her throat...they'll look like mean a-holes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. I strongly beg to disagree with you!
This is another typical Bill Clinton selfishness and not caring much about the impact of his actions on the democratic party. When are we going to start calling on him to be far more thoughtful of the party than himself and his family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
56. LOL You don't have to beg, just disagree!
Sorry, couldn't resist!

Clinton isn't being selfish, he's just not really a Democrat anymore. He's a former president. Even Nixon and Reagan avoided partisanship once they left the White House. Bush Daddy is an exception, but only when dealing with his son, and even there, he's shown incredible restraint. (I'm talking publicly--privately they're all pretty vicious.)

Former presidents are supposed to be above partisanship, only offering key endorsements and fundraising assistance during election time, but otherwise staying out of the fray and acting like statesmen.

That's Clinton's roll, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. How did you miss Barbara Bush ......
.... referring to Bill Clinton as her "son" recently?

I've lost all respect for him and for Hillary. A couple of pandering hypocrites, those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He's done a lot of strange things lately
pandering to the Bushes, praising Karl Rove, etc. But this really pisses me off. He can praise Ailes if he wants, but doing a TRIBUTE to him - and this publicly - just takes me over the edge.

Bye bye Willy Boy. It was nice while it lasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Sucking up to the Israeli lobby, no doubt
His whoring is embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Wow. You're just now...
...figuring that one out? Don't meant to sound condescending, but I saw that handwriting on the wall about 12 years ago. He's just too, well, slick for my tastes. He proved it by kowtowing to the same masters that rule most of our elected leaders.

I kept hearing all this hoopla about Obama leading up to his moment in the sun at last year's convention. When I saw his speech, I got the willies listening to him, the "slick willies" to be exact. He strikes me as being cut from the same over-polished cloth as Clinton. Like the former POTUS, he can certainly deliver a speech but time will tell what kind of substance lies beneath the shiny veneer. Jury's still out on him now, but I'm skeptical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. What makes you think.......
........I'm "just figuring that one out"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. It's just an expression...
...used to underscore his transparency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. No, it's not
You just read far too much into what I wrote so as to use it as a platform for your remarks. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Kreskin? That you? n/t**
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Woo hoooooo
:sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
53. Clinton likes everyone. Get over it.
Clinton likes everyone and wants to be friends with everyone. He doesn't take politics personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. As sick as that was, I can understand why Barbara might admire...
Clinton. Remember, Clinton is very well accomplished and won the Presidency TWICE on his own abilities. George is a theif, who relied upon his daddy to get him through life. I know pro-Bush Repubs who bash Clinton, but admired him for his strength and ability to accomplish so much in his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. She doesn't admire him,
and she didn't say that. She owns him.

She likes owning him, and Clinton's sold himself to Those People.

Believe me, they don't admire him at all, except that he was able to fight dirtier than Poppy to beat him. That's all. He's another of their lapdogs.

Soon, he'll be a Carlyle Group guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Not Carlyle
Clinton wants to be UN Sec Gen, that is if there's anything left of the UN after Dubya and Bolton are finished with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Naw, he won't get that
He won't become a Carlyle guy, either. That was just me amusing myself.

They own Clinton, but they're not about to give him anything, let alone a platform upon which he might outshine any Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. No surprise.
Bill Clinton has been tied in with the BFEE since the CIA was running part of their Iran/Contra scam through an airport in Arkansas...

I mean, come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. LOL
You tinfoilers crack me up! :tinfoilhat:

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. oops! too late!
Nothing like a smear to avoid research or debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Prove she is wrong then
and good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. Why don't you ask John Kerry about it
I doubt Clinton had much to do with, but Mena was used by the CIA to smuggle cocaine into America as a part of the Iran-Contra affair. A very sordid affair it was, Iran-Contra. And Poppy was the spider in the web.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Original message
Yes, I know. I'm a loony conspiracy theorist.
No need to unwrap the tin foil references.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Mena, Ark. Tons of cocaine...TONS. GHWB n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. But it's all "Tin foil" hat stuff, don'tch know?
Cocaine Import Agency

http://www.csun.edu/CommunicationStudies/ben/news/cia/

In August of 1996, the San Jose Mercury News published a three-part investigation by Gary Webb into the U.S. government's links to the trade in crack cocaine in South Central Los Angeles. Webb's investigation uncovered links between the Central Intelligence Agency's covert war against Nicaragua and convicted Los Angeles drug dealer "Freeway" Ricky Ross, whom the Los Angeles Times in 1994 had dubbed the "one outlaw capitalist most responsible for flooding Los Angeles' streets with mass-marketed cocaine." (20 December 1994 p. A20)

The (admittedly sensationalized, but basically accurate) story generated much controversy, and heated denials from the mainstream media (in particular the local paper of record, whose editor Shelby Coffey III couldn't bear the thought of someone else beating his paper out on a major story in his own backyard). This vehement denegration, however, is largely inconsistent with the historical record (some of which has been, and continues to be, reported in these same papers).

This web site is part of a long-standing research project of mine. As a scholar working at the interstices of speech communication and cultural studies, I have been investigating the public discourse surrounding the "war on drugs" as an exercise in disciplinary social control. This site is a database of information, evidence, and other resources that have helped guide me in this research project, and will hopefully help others working along the same lines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Really?
I wish I had had more time to spend on conspiracy theories during my productive years, but I was busy with other things. Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Clinton administration that set the tone for Bush admins invasion of Iraq
2003 Democracy Now!
http://www.pacifica.org/programs/dn/040730.html

"Some veteran Iraq observers say that it was the Clinton administration that set the tone for the Bush administration"s invasion of Iraq. It was Clinton who began the most sustained bombing campaign since Vietnam, when, in 1998, he began almost daily attacks on Iraq in the so-called no-fly zones. And in 1998, Clinton"s administration made so-called regime change in Iraq official US policy.

During his presidency, Bill Clinton presided over the most devestating regime of economic sanctions in history that the UN estimated took the lives of as many as a million Iraqis, the vast majority of them children. In May of 1996, 60 Minutes aired an interview with Madeline Albright, who at the time was Clinton"s UN Ambassador. Correspondent Leslie Stahl said to Albright, "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that"s more children than died in Hiroshima. And -- and you know, is the price worth it?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Not to mention his blind support of "The War On Drugs".
Creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. Wasn't that on the tape Jerry Falwall was selling?
Didn't he also bring in all the cocaine in America and have thirty or was it fifty people killed? That tape was filled with "evidence" of the millions of crimes Clinton committed. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. AILES IS A FASCIST HATCHET-MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am incredibly disappointed in Clinton for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I am too
*sigh* :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I am beyond disappointment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have never cared for Bill Clinton because of this kind of crap
He is a politican and always angling for what must be done to get re-elected. He was NEVER a liberal, despite what the Right claimed. At best, he was a moderate Republican in the 70's sense of the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Join the Crowd
the Clintons have been sucking up to the Bush's and the Jewish community for a long time now, all in preparation for Hillary's run. Remember Hillary was a Republican long before she was a Democrat and Bill was always right of center. These two are out for themselves in any way they can promote it.

These two are not friends of Progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yeah, but those were good years
Peace and prosperity...seems like a dream....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. We might have to join the right wing in their campaign to ruin her then.
Seriously, do we really want someone who is this close to the enemy. I mean, Ted Kennedy and Orin Hatch are freinds behind the scenes but there was NEVER this type of overt love-fest between them. Clinton should be ashamed. God Bless Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Clinton better be real careful
Hes treading on really thin ice here. If he keeps giving these evil fuks praise hes gonna lose his base. Me included. Ive been teetering on a dislike of him since he agreed with Bushs illegal bogus war.

He just better be reaaaaal careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. I never did like Clinton. But, as Republicans go he wasn't all that bad.
Smooth talker though. Fooled a lot of Democrats into thinking he was a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. nor did I. I agree with your post. he was a smooth talker and
he has quite the little "cult of personality" following as does his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. I will always love Bill Clinton. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. ROGER FUCKING AILES?
Clinton really has gone to the Dark Side. All this talk of "keeping one's enemies closer" doesn't apply when they apparently aren't your enemies anymore.

I mean, I got pissed at Clinton for promising worker protections in NAFTA during his run and then gutting those protections to get NAFTA passed, but this is just insane.

Has he really forgotten the utter evil of Ailes' actions?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
41. Isn't this the same Roger Ailes
whose company Newscorp (which owns Fox News) led the way during the impeachment of Clinton?

I'm finding it harder to even feel sorry for Clinton over even the impeachment, because he seems to be on such good terms with those that led the witch-hunt.

Clinton is a very charismatic guy, but I always thought that either Gore or Kerry would have made much better presidents. As an ex-president, Carter has been a much more consistant moral voice. Clinton and his wife always seemed like they had their own interests above those of the party or anyone else for that matter.

That's why by the time he left, the party had lost control of the House, the Senate, and a majority of governorships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Gore and Kerry are more worthy of the White House than Clinton.
That I agree with. I'd hate to see Hillary in 08'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. Sigh!
I still love you President Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. He's all yours now
I defended him through Monicagate and have greatly admired him for years. But this ONE THING - paying tribute to Ailes - just sends me over the proverbial edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. The Clintons are smooth Con Artists.
Repub Lites love 'em. Rethugs hate 'em because they aren't RW extreme but have the charm to infiltrate the upper crust of the World Elite.

This was amusing: "they'll look like mean a-holes!" Refering to the Rethugs. Anybody think they aren't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
54. all in all ... the world was better with Bill in charge than GW
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. true
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC