Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ban on Rebel flag items is overruled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:07 AM
Original message
Ban on Rebel flag items is overruled
Ban on Rebel flag items is overruled

JUDGE SIDES WITH STUDENT IN W.VA. CASE

By Brian Farkas

ASSOCIATED PRESS

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - A federal judge has ruled a high school dress code that banned items bearing the "Rebel flag" is overly broad and violates students' rights to free speech.

But U.S. District Judge John T. Copenhaver Jr. warned students if they use the Confederate battle flag as a symbol to violate the rights of others, "the very ban struck down today might be entirely appropriate."

Copenhaver's ruling came in a lawsuit filed by Hurricane (W.Va.) High School senior Franklin Bragg, who was ordered to serve two in-house detentions last November for wearing the T-shirt with the flag's image.

The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia after attempts to resolve the issue with school officials failed.

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/local/11793677.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. The irony of this is that West Virginia seceded for Virginia
because of the Civil Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Are you sure it wasn't Angkor Wat ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Would you believe its already been a long day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Considering West Virginia's origins as a state.. I wonder if this kid
sees the irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Great Escape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Southern WVa...
was largely pro-confederate. I imagine back in the day, the average citizen would have preferred to remain in Virginia. The boundaries of WVa were largely shaped by the physical presence of Union troops, defensive considerations and a desire to punish Virginia. But you are right. I doubt that he does the irony thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good decision.
If we don't protect speech we don't like, we can't protect speech that we do like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. So schools should not be allowed dress codes?
I think it is appropriate for a school to regulate the appropriate attire for it's students. They don't allow gang colors in LA schools. Is that also a denial of free speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Just how far do you want them to go?
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 10:49 AM by bowens43
You want them all to wear uniforms?

Sorry, free speech is not trumped by hurt feelings. This was a good decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. School is a unique environment
Kids should be regulated on disruptive behavior. School is not a free speech zone believe it or not. Kids can not just do and say what they please. After school is out they can wear anything they wish or say anything they wish but not during school. What if a girl wanted to come to school dressed in a bikini? She does not have that right nor should she. It would be extremely disruptive. Hormones are raging at that age. Wearing something that is so emotionally charged is also disruptive. I think this was a very bad ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. I think you are wrong in this instance.
Parents expect a safe environment for their children in school. What would that kid have proved if others, so angry at what that flag represents, lost their temper and assaulted him. What if he wound up in the hospital with broken bones. Then his friends and others might jump in an all hell breaks loose. Common sense should always be used. Also, what do you think would happen if a black kid came in with a tee shirt stamped Black Power and showing a large black raised fist. That would create a lot of trouble either in school or once it was over. The school was exercising good judgment, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with the ACLU on this.
However, I would also agree with the Black students beating the racist's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why not make their own t-shirts
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 10:21 AM by Ravenseye
"hey rednecks, guess what? We won. You lost. Suck our big black cocks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, but...
...when you look at US society, can you really say Black people "won?" Perhaps outright slavery was banned, but the road to justice is still winding into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes, but...
It's perfectly possible now for a black man to go to college, get a good job, start his own company, become a millionare, marry a white woman, divorce her and take her money, marry a black woman, raise healthy rich black babies who buy and sell the white rednecks in the trailer parks who once owned them.

Sure most are stuck in poverty and there are many things that need to be done to help them, particularly bring back manufacturing jobs to the US with fair trade laws.

Still it's progress right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. that would be great on a t-shirt,
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 10:52 AM by barb162
bwaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Really? would you also agree with
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 10:54 AM by comsymp
freepers beating the asses of anybody wearing a "Fuck Bush" t-shirt?


EDITING to agree w/Bowens, and your first comment - it's the unpopular / controversial speech which needs protecting~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, of course not.
But I am not a pacifist, and there is a right and a wrong. It is right to strike at racists and fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Ah, OK.
Maybe you'd better send out a memo on whom it is / isn't permissible to hit, just so there won't be any confusion. You know how people can get when left to rely on their own judgement in these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Those wearing confederate flags need no memo.
The racists carry out terror regardless of anti-racists' desires. The question is whether or not to crush them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Boyohboyohboy, we could argue at least 3 separate points in that
statement.

I'll just stick to the game already in progress.

A) We don't, as individual members - or as groups of individuals - of a society, get to decide whose asses deserve kicking, and then go act on it without repercussions. "One man's terrorist...", etc. Based on the inferred system of Perception of Threat Justifies Violent Action in your comments, how would this work: If, in this case, the white kid wearing the CBF t-shirt was assaulted by a black kid wearing an X t-shirt, wouldn't that black kid be next in line for an asswhuppin?


Oh, and B) Violence. Doesn't. Work.

(see: Hussein, Saddam; Iraq, Invasion Of; Afghanistan, Soviet Invasions of)

And just because... free speech which is challenged by society-approved violence, ain't free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. I prefer a personal ban, including
(and I live in Atlanta) any yahoo driving up to my house to sell me firewood or lawn services or whatever and the Rebel flag is pasted to their vehicle. Just don't even bother to get out and talk to me. You're not hired.
Another way to cull the herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC