Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reminder; We can impeach ALL of Bush's Judges if we win in '06

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:43 PM
Original message
Reminder; We can impeach ALL of Bush's Judges if we win in '06
And we should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. On what grounds? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because they suck ass? Or they smell like ass?
Edited on Mon May-23-05 06:45 PM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. For as much grounds as they had on Clinton.
NOTHIBG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Representative Gerald Ford said it best....
"An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Exactly right.
And this is just as "fair" as what Frist is trying to pull. Moreso as it does not require ANY rules changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What's more I don't think Frist ever had the votes....
Not the 66 official filibuster rule change, nor the 60 up or down vote, and I really am beginning to think he fell short of the 50-plus-Cheney tiebreaker vote end-run rule change scam. Close only works with horseshoes and hand grenades - LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. We will never win another election
as long as we vote on evoting machines. It will never happen. The repukes OWN the evoting machine companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Very true. We COULD easily sweep in 2006 and 2008.
But we won't because we CAN'T win because THE MACHINES ARE RIGGED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's true.
I get the feeling that these Senators acted to deny Dick Cheney the opportunity to "dissolve" the Senate as we know it. And after all, perhaps all those judges won't PASS an up or down vote?

But, it also appears that * is going to get ALL of his judges, even the Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rigel99 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. NOT LIKELY
until and unless we get rid of electronic voting machines,
they will rig 2006 elections the same way they rigged prior elections..

it's all over till we fix election fraud...

FYI...

CA, OH and many other states are about to buy massive amounts of Diebold or ES&S touchscreens, both owned by the same repbulican financial backers ....

nice thought, but campaigning and door knocking is no longer where our energies should be, rather , in the shutting down of electronic voting period...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. That might be a bad precident to set...
after all, even as bad as Bush has stained the republicans, there *will* be another GOP president/congress someday.

And they're meaner, and more vindictive than we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'll worry about that day when it arrives. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, not really.
To impeach a federal judge you have to be able to show some really, really gross or criminal misconduct (beyond bad ideology). It almost never happens. The John Birchers wanted desperately to impeach Earl Warren years ago (because he was "too liberal,") and they never came even close. But if the filibuster is preserved -- and this is really the big thing -- the Dems can still block the appointment of extremist Supreme Court justices, which is much more important than keeping these few nutjobs off the federal courts of appeals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. if the dems politicized the courts like that
no way would I be a dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. And the GOP can do the same thing with impunity?
While we lay down and take it?

I don't consider that as an alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. when did they "impeach all of the dem-appointed judges"
I must have missed that.

When did the republicans impeach every single one of Clinton's judges?

And no, I don't mean when did they pocket-filibuster a lot of them. I mean, when did they impeach every single one of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Packing the court by pressure tactics is just as bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unless they've done something illegal in office, we can't
Impeachment isn't supposed to be a political weapon: it's supposed to be a legal proceeding against office holders who break one or more laws in office.

That's what a lot of the flap over the Clinton impeachment proceedings revolved around: whether Clinton had lied under oath (about his sex life), and if he did, whether lying under oath (about his sex life) was legal grounds for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. A "High Crime" is not defined...
for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcon007 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think our entire focus should be on jailing Bush, Cheney, Rove,
and Wolfowitz...just to name a few. They are murderous traitors to the extreme and they need to be brought to justice as quickly as possible if we win in '06 and '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC