Why did the neoCON, corporacrat imperialists ATTACK Newsweek?

[Just Me]

Was it to HIDE the facts surrounding the deaths of unarmed, civilian protestors?

Was it to HIDE the fact that anti-Americanism is on the rise as a result of the US corpocratic oppression upon a weaker people?

Was it to HIDE the fact that US military was involved in deadly suppression of the freedom to speak and oppose an oppressive situation?

Was it to pin future "terrorist acts" on a squib contained in a short article published by a 'recalcitrant' US publication?

Was it to assert further CONTROL over those who fail to toe-the-imperialist-line?

Was it to further demean ALL media reports which fail to report what those power-mongering fascists DEMAND be reported as "liberally biased"?

Was it "cover" for the reports on the British report which verifies the neoCON regime LIED LIED LIED?

OR,...WAS IT ALL OF THE ABOVE?!?!?!?!


These manipulative, oppressive, egotistical, greedy freakin' human predators are enemies to ALL humanity. While they have violently (by mind or body or spirit) imposed their DARK "vision" of human greed and weakness and fear as THEE reality of human existence, proven by human history to be FALSE, they have truly EARNED over the last forty years the POLITICAL AND HUMAN RACE DEBT THAT EXTINGUISHES THEIR FALSE POLITICAL CAPITAL!!!

They DESERVE the inevitable fallout. I know it's gonna' hurt those who cling to money as the source of their identity (though definitely NOT the majority of humanity who have been forced into the position to just survive rather than BE FREE),...but,...everyone has a choice between common human integrity and putting one's soul up for auction.

My empathy will be reserved for the "oppressed", NOT THE WILFULLY REPRESSED!!!

[Zuni]

1. huh?

[Just Me]

8. Your position is?

Let me guess/assume/judge/assert that,....

On second thought, I won't. What's your proposition which WILL suffer a wee bit of scrutiny by skeptics?

Please, share.

[Zuni]

9. oooh... touchy

my, aren't we acting a wee bit sensitive today?

[Just Me]

11. ROTFLMAO!!! "oooh,...touchy" because I challenge you?

Don't be silly or bully by emotional blackmail. KAY!

[Just Me]

13. Ya' really think your evasive tactics ALWAYS work?

I'm not "touchy". I am demanding.

You,...are being evasive.

Why?

[Just Me]

15. Still waiting for your tab on reality and life presumptiously ABOVE,....

,..."Just Me" and all those in my shoes rather than your slippers *cough*

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Zuni]

17. meh

[ChavezSpeakstheTruth]

18. hee hee - that's nice

I'm sure I'd take your bait - it's so attractive :eyes:

[Bok_Tukalo]

2. Just a target of opportunity for the political arm of the Executive Branch

That's all.

[pstans]

3. Because of William Kristol

Because of William Kristol who is the editor of the Weekly Standard and a key member of the PNAC. Why not take out the competition while they piss on Islam.

[ewagner]

4. None of the above

The reason they went after Newsweek was because the Clerics demanded an apology within three days or they would start a Jiihad.

Now we couldn't have Dubya actually apologize to a bunch of dirty old Islamic Clerica could we? :sarcasm:

Somebody had to take the fall and Dubya and KKKarl thought it would be nice to have Newsweek do it and also get smeared as being part of the liberal media....

Newsweek thinks it's doing something "patriotic".

:puke:

[FreedomAngel82]

5. Also

they may be getting ready for something else. :shrug:

[ewagner]

6. Oh?

Any idea what?

[Just Me]

10. Which "clerics" living in what country?

Are you talking about "clerics" living in Afganistan or Pakistan or Iraq or Saudi Arabia or what?

:shrug:

I'm just trying to figure in a neoCON imperialist world.

[Just Me]

12. ewagner,...what clerics in which country do you believe,...

,...are controlling our neoCON imperialists? I am very curious about your perspective.

[Fire Walk With Me]

7. Who's afraid of a little anthrax-laced letter or two?

Wasn't the anthrax traced to a source inside the US?

[Just Me]

14. So, what's up?

:shrug:

Has a squib been MANIPULATED to divert from the facts, as usual?

Who's the enemy of your future, of something beyond you?