Speaking of Chan Chandler...

[snowbear]

DU this poll on the Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0512/p03s01-ussc.html

It asks "Should pastors use their pulpits to tell people how to vote?"

I Google Chan Chandler every couple or days or so to see if he winds up in some wacko rightwing church somewhere and to see if there's any update on the lawsuits filed against him.

The most sickening commentary I've found so far on Chan the CLAN Chandler was in the Texarkana Gazette.. :puke: http://www.texarkanagazette.com/articles/2005/05/12/local_news/opinion/opinions01.txt

[Syncronaut Seven]

1. Um... This ones wayfargone at 92%

Better to let them have it. Polls that skewed are better left alone, less credible that way.

[aquart]

4. Uh, read it again.

"No. It's important to draw a boundary between ballot-box and faith-based choices.
92.8%

Yes. Free speech for the clergy is crucial to the sanctity of broader societal debate.
7.2%
Total votes: 529"

Our side is winning.

[Syncronaut Seven]

5. Oops,At least I think I voted correctly.

It's late, I'm tied, er... tired.

[NAO]

2. Radical Cleric Deposed b/c he threated tax-exempt status of American Talib

Radical Cleric Chan Chandler Deposed because he threated tax-exempt status of American Taliban

Rev. Chandler was deposed and forced into exile as a result of his attempt to conduct an ideological purge of his fundamentalist cell that was offensive to even his fellow radical clerics.

Inside sources report that it was not so much that it was offensive to other American Taliban Radical Clerics; rather it incited fear among them that they may lose their coveted tax-exempt status which allows them to finance their religious jihads against American Democracy tax-free.

[FreedomAngel82]

3. Thanks

Thanks for the CSM one. I voted and so far "No" is winning.

No- 92.8%

Yes- 7.2%

[Liberty Belle]

6. Kick! 92% "No"