That takes my annoyance level down a bit. It bothered me the presidnet was not told - just told - no need to have him whisked away or anything like that - but tell him what is the current situation and then have him decide if he should finish his bike ride or get on a phone and see what's what. He is a war president and his staff should be on a war footing.
1 posted on 05/12/2005 5:32:37 PM PDT by Destro
To: Destro
If we were fighting a WAR on terror, China, NK, and Colombia/Venezuela would be third, fourth, and fifth fronts already. War, schmar. We haven't even got a national production scheme for Hummer armor. There is no war.
3 posted on 05/12/2005 5:37:52 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
To: LibertarianInExile
If we wage war like this - God Save the Republic because our leaders won't.
4 posted on 05/12/2005 5:40:31 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Destro
It bothered me the presidnet was not told - just told - no need to have him whisked away or anything like that - but tell him what is the current situation and then have him decide if he should finish his bike ride or get on a phone and see what's what. He is a war president and his staff should be on a war footing.
I guess. I got a chuckle out of the bold text. “War president.” Haha.
Let me remind you about our war president.
We held a bunch of unlawful enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay that had been captured in Afghanistan.
One of them had been captured after posing as a non-combatant, concealing a sidearm, and pretending to be dead/wounded. When a U.S. serviceman approached to check his condition - believing he was an innocent civilian - he rolled over suddenly and shot him in the face, killing him.
Captured the guy, hauled him to Guantanamo, fed and housed him, and subsequently released him with ~107 others in November of 2003.
An unlawful enemy combatant posed as a non-combatant, concealed a weapon, feigned death/injury, and *murdered* a U.S. serviceman – and the “war president” released him.
No offense, but the war president needs to spend the rest of his life in prison, IMO. Especially as they’re busy prosecuting people that laughed and pointed at some limp-d*cked Arabs penis – or “scared” someone with a dog.
Not particularly directed at you, but this “president” is useless as teats on a boar. Way more embarrassing than Billy bent-p*cker, IMO.
Oh - those unlawful enemy combatants - haven't executed a single one YET. Aren't going to either. That's the war president. It's enough to run a maggot off a gut wagon.
Of course they didn't tell him - regardless of what they claim. They knew it wouldn't result in any action, so why bother. That's my opinion too.
7 posted on 05/12/2005 6:15:34 PM PDT by Who dat?
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402122/posts