Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is the better candidate for Liberals, Dean or Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:48 PM
Original message
Who is the better candidate for Liberals, Dean or Clark?
Dean was called a liberal, but I read a piece that showedthat his record is far from it.

Clark is a military commander, which makes him somewhat antithetical as a liberal leader, but he has Michael Moore's endorsement.

So which one should I choose to back?

(I am a radical Liberal who loves Kucinch and Gore.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clark
Although my neutrality is suspect on this issue, I would advise going to draftwesleyclark.com and going to the issues section for a full summary. While he is pro-guns, the rest of his platform is pretty in line with the, to quote Dr. Dean, "Democratic wing of the Democratic party".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Assuming either would be elected, then the issue would be
which one could get a liberal agenda accepted and passed? I think Clark has lots of middle-of-the-road friends, who might follow his lead, but Dean has more charisma and Clinton-esque ability to get compromise and action. So, probably Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Clark is a liberal-leaning moderate.
From all I've read.

He was one of the few who backed up Kerry who was advocating for gays to be allowed to serve openly in the military at a time when few politicians would stick their necks out like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not enough info on Clark yet
The issues page makes him a fairly typical Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowledgeispower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have the same question
I guess it really depends on whether you agree with the Clinton plan (balancing the budget) and which candidate you think can do it best. Dean has made it clear he wants to balance the budget, and I assume that Clark will do the same since he is apparently "Clinton's guy" (sorry if that offends you Clark supporters).

Me personally, I'm not even sold on this whole balancing the budget thing. It was the best thing Clinton did during EIGHT YEARS IN OFFICE and look how quickly the Republicans threw us right back into an even bigger deficit. It simply won't work, because the Repugs will always find ways to enact tax cuts and raise military spending to bust the budget. If you could guarantee that the Dems could have 20 years in office I MIGHT think it was a good idea, but with only 4 to 8 the Repugs can undo any good far quicker than the Dems can do that good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Micheal Moore is not God, his endorsement is one of many.
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sham Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I agree with you on that.
But there hasn't even been an endorsement from Moore. See post #21.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged American Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm already sick of Clark.
AP and several others agree with me: Clark is no good. The point of the election is to draw attention to issues other than "national security." Clark appeals to only those who think their cars are going to get hijacked on their way to Walmart (the fact that these folks could help Clark win the election is irrelevant here). Clark has no position on any issues and pussyfoots on free trade. He's the Arnold Schwarzenegger of our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Christ, Have Some Patience
He's already said he'd have positions out in a few weeks.

Clark will CRUSH Shrub on foreign policy, while all of the other candidates except perhaps Kerry and Graham will have problems. Meanwhile, while Clark is nullifying that classically Thug advantage and turning it to his own, he can ALSO crush Shrub on domestic policy. You act like it's one or the other; with Clark, it can be both.

He's the Arnold Schwarzenegger of our party.

Thank you for discrediting yourself.

:eyes:

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. geez ...
Do you really think that you are helping your candidate with your constant, irrational bashing of another candidate? If this is the quality of support and supporters Dennis gets, it makes me re-think him completely. This sort of constant crap will make it a difficult chore to pull a lever for your boy if he somehow manages to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Has Arnold Schwarzenneger commanded all of NATO Europe's troops?
The amount of disrespect toward Clark is ridiculous.

If he *were* just an actor like Arnold Schwarzenneger, he'd get more respect around DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Kucinich, Dean or Green Right?
Sorry to use Centrist's phrase but you extremist wackos are going to give us another McGovern-like election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Clark or Bush right?
See how silly that is. Even if it may be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imhotep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. neither
they are both politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. I Think They're Both Left-of-Center
And similar on many, many positions.

The difference as I see it is that Clark will have the gravitas necessary on foreign policy to defend his decisions, while Dean will be constantly second-guessed by the Thugs.

On domestic policy, Dean is more experienced, but that's also an area where you can rely on advisors more easily without looking weak, and also an area where Congress will play a large role.

The Presidency, as head of the Executive Branch, plays more of an indispensable role in setting foreign policy. While the Presidency has certainly emerged as more and more important in recent decades in setting domestic policy as well, again, I think Congress and advisors (particularly the Cabinet) is also critical there.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clark Is Military, But ALSO Liberal
You appear to have a view of military folks as conservative and/or warlike. Would a warlike person say this?

"The highest calling of the armed forces is not to wage war, but to prevent war." -- General Wesley K. Clark

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Definitely Clark is more liberal than Doctor Dean.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Really? On what issues??? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. When did Moore endorse Clark?
Go to a Clark meet up. Read Clark's website and blog. Watch Clark debate and speak to a crowd.

Go to a Dean meet up. Read Dean's website and blog. Watch Dean debate and speak to a bigger crowd.

Dean's candidacy is a historic, organic, iterative grassroots endeavor. Clark's candidacy has just started.

If Dean's army of small activist contributors and insurgent, outsider appeal pulls off the ultimate political success, I think American democracy will be forever changed for the better. I think the stage will be set for even more progressive candidates to run with the empowering small contributor campaign paradigm that Dean, his staff and his supporters are building.

But you have to make up your own mind, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sham Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. He didn't.
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 06:59 PM by sham
He urged him to get into the race, said that he likes him, but there was no endorsement. The poster did not read the entire Moore article.

Michael Moore to Wesley Clark: Run!
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/index.php?messageDate=2003-09-12
This is not an endorsement. For me, it's too early for that. I have liked Howard Dean (in spite of his flawed positions in support of some capital punishment, his grade "A" rating from the NRA, and his opposition to cutting the Pentagon budget). And Dennis Kucinich is so committed to all the right stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Neither is particularly liberal...
Clark a little moreso than Dean. Kucinich and the war guys (Kerry Edwards, Gephart) are about the same as Dean ideologically-Graham may be a touch more conservative.

There's really not a lot of ideological differences between the candidates. We turn molehills into mountains here, because we care so passionately, but most Americans could care less. If the election is held and Bush can be beat, almost any Democrat could beat him. If the economy soars, Iraq settles down and there are no more 9/11's then a Jesus/Superman ticket will lose to */Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. There actually almost identical on the issues?
But, I prefer someone who governed over someone who oversaw battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. I was starting to like Clark, until I read this . . .
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=11938

hanging himself with his own words, imo . . . the positions expressed in this article are pretty much identical to those of Joe Lieberman . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes, that article troubles me.
It makes Clark look like an opportunist who dropped his criticisms about the war when he thought his side "lost." I don't like it. It's stopped my Clarkward drift in the last day dead in its tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC