Intelligent(?) Design discussion about to start on CSPAN

[MrScorpio]

:popcorn:

[rodeodance]

1. "State Board Science Subcommittee"--the people for Intelligent Design"

will make recommendations to State board of Science for revissions of what is to be taught in terms of standards.

[rodeodance]

2. Should other forms of how the world was formed be taught in a

science class?--Is the qeustion.
The answer-Science should be tought.
IT is not a science per Perter Folger Ameican Geophysical Union Outreach Director

[rodeodance]

3. IT is not being discussed within science.

[rodeodance]

4. How should evolution be taught in the classroom--Mary Ryland says

there are a lot of weaknesses in the theory.
He is from the Discovery Institute.

[OrlandoGator]

5. n/t

[OrlandoGator]

6. There are a lot of weaknesses to the Theory of Gravity, too.

No one can explain why small objects stick to really big objects. I guess that means that we should also teach "OrlandoGator's theory of cosmic SuperGlue" as an alternative.

Gravity is just a theory, not fact.

[NewHampshireDem]

7. There's a great quote by the woman chairing the hearings in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=3205848&mesg_id=3205848

I assume she is, anyway, as I can't watch since my son is watching "Clifford, the Big Red Dog"