Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing, Lockheed form joint venture to build death rockets with our money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 08:09 PM
Original message
Boeing, Lockheed form joint venture to build death rockets with our money
Boeing, Lockheed Martin to form joint venture to build rockets

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two of the nation's largest defense contractors, The Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp., said late Monday they have agreed to create a joint venture to produce rockets for the U.S. military.

>>>>The joint venture, to be named United Launch Alliance, would be the sole provider of rocket launches to be used by the U.S. Air Force, NASA and other government agencies.

>>>>The move comes just two months after the Air Force lifted a 20-month ban prohibiting Boeing from bidding on satellite launch contracts, saying the Chicago-based company had corrected problems that led to accusations that it stole information from Lockheed Martin in 1998.

>>>>In a joint news release, the two companies said United Launch Alliance would be based in Denver and structured as a 50-50 venture. The new business would combine services currently provided separately by Boeing's integrated defense division and Lockheed's space systems company for launches of each company's respective rockets — the Boeing Delta and Lockheed Atlas rockets.



In order to replace weapons used in Afghanistan, and in concert with the military conflict in Iraq, most U.S. weapons makers have increased production. Bombs are big business again and the Bush administration has opened the candy store, exporting death, conquest, and perpetual war.

With a share of 24% of U.S. arms exports, Lockheed-Martin is the world's largest arms exporting company. Lockheed leads the pack of defense contractors who do business with the U.S. with valuable Pentagon contracts worth a total of nearly $30 billion and an advertised $70 billion backlog. Lockheed Martin now has over $77 billion in federal contracts, primarily (but not exclusively) with the Defense Dept.

Lockheed has 125,000 employees in the United States and overseas with 939 facilities in 457 cities and 45 states throughout the U.S.; internationally, with business locations in 56 nations and territories.

Lockheed leads the defense industry in lobbying expenditures. Lockheed Martin made over $10.6 million in campaign contributions to candidates and party committees from 1990 to 2000, including $3.4 million in donations in the run-up to the year 2000 elections.

The company actively lobbies for the need to retain substantial numbers of existing nuclear weapons while developing new ones. Lockheed Martin receives more than $1 billion per year from the Department of Energy - to operate the Sandia National Laboratories (involved in the design and production of nuclear warheads) and help run the Nevada Test Site for "sub-critical testing" of new nuclear weapons designs

-Peter B. Teets, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, is a former president and chief operating officer of Lockheed Martin who retired from the company in late 1999. Teets now serves as the director of the National Reconnaissance Office and chief procurement officer for all of military space, controlling a budget in excess of $65 billion.

-James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force is a former president of Northrop-Grumman, a subsidiary of Lockheed.

-Stephen Hadley, Condi Rice's former deputy and our new national security advisor, was a partner in Shea & Gardner, the Washington law firm representing Lockheed Martin.

- Gordon England, Secretary of the Navy, was a General Dynamics contractor and a former president of Lockheed.

-Michael Jackson, Deputy Secretary of Transportation is the former Vice President, Former CEO of Lockheed Information and Management Services and a shareholder.

-Dov Zakheim - Under Secretary for Comptroller of Defense was a paid advisory board member of Northrup-Grumman.

-Nelson F. Gibbs, Air Force; Assistant Secretary for Installations, Environment and Logistics is a former corporate comptroller for Northrop-Grumman.

-I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff and Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs was a Northrup-Grumman consultant.

Boeing had the upper hand in influencing the purchase of Air Force goodies during the first quarter of the Bush I presidency.

Boeing was probably best known in the past for making commercial jet airplanes. These days 40% its annual revenue is generated from the sale of military aircraft, missiles, lasers, guidance systems, and the like.

The Associated Press reported before the current invasion of Iraq that the U.S. military had stockpiled 17,000 Joint Direct Attack Munitions, or JDAMs. Air Force Secretary James Roche announced that they were "sufficient for a war against Iraq" courtesy of an accelerated production by Boeing. Boeing makes the JDAM, which is a tail cone attached to standard 1,000-and 2,000-pound bombs allowing them to be guided to a target as they fall, using GPS satellite signals.

After the Air Force dropped more than 6,000 of the JDAMs over Afghanistan, it realized it would need more to drop on Iraq and asked Boeing to accelerate production.

-Karl Rove, Senior Advisor to the President is a Boeing shareholder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democratic nations don't pursue WMD's or so we are told by those who
lie through their teeth.




http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/06/10_wmd.html
WMD: Before and After
June 10, 2003
By Jim Caddell, The Unrepentant Liberal

If you followed the news reports before and after the conquest of Iraq, you may have noticed a distinct difference in tone. The administration began to play down weapons of mass destruction and began emphasizing the "liberation" of Iraq. However, after talking about WMD until the whole country was sick of hearing about them, questions were bound to be asked. The contrast between the administration's stance before and after Baghdad's fall is striking:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, these bombs are designed to kill masses of people at a time
In Iraq these weapons have 'liberated' tens of thousands of innocent civilians of their lives and countless more of their livlihoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I aim for the stars
but sometimes I hit London (or Tehran in this case)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC