Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About the pregnant teen... I only have one question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:34 PM
Original message
About the pregnant teen... I only have one question
is the media, anyone here, or otherwise either:

1. A family member
2. Her doctor
3. A friend
4. Her
5. Her social worker
6. Or at the very least someone that bloody knows her.

If not then it's none of your (or mine) business what she does unless you're asked! It's up to her and those involved to be involved, not to sit around and comment and get involved in her business when you've not been asked to.

The ONLY thing that should be talked about are the ones who are attempting to involve themselves in her reproductive health. This is a very difficult time for her and thanks to the media the whole country is involved in what she likely considers to be her personal and private business - not the business of whoever watches CNN. I have particularly been disgusted by comments from people who don't even know the details about her (nor do they have any business knowing them) condemning her.

Last year after a close friend and I just graduated high school I helped her get an abortion (no, the preganancy was not my doing) and I know this is something that most people do NOT appreciate the whole world knowing about, nor appreciate strangers giving their 2 cents about what they think she should do. It's unfortunate that people can't respect others privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. the state has made it their business
and we as taxpayers are the state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. BS
Edited on Sat Apr-30-05 05:38 PM by Unions
You have no business getting involved in a persons reproductive health unless you are asked. She is entitled to medical privacy. Perhaps if you were a judge the situation would be different, but you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:42 PM
Original message
You are not paying attention
As Florida residents, we are involved. I've never commented on this case, but the state of Florida has made it a public issue. Whether or not I open my mouth on the subject, we are involved. Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's public
as far as the courts are concerned. However, it has gone beyond that in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. if your point is simply that the choice is the girl's alone, I agree
but the state is determined that it should not be her choice, regardless that state law allows a minor to obtain an abortion without consent of a parent or guardian. My only interest is in the actions of the state, and you need to be concerned about that yourself. Even if you don't care about this girl's rights, it effects your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think you totally missed the point
I agree entirely that the actions of the state are totally wrong and I hope the ACLU is able to handle the matter in time.

However, my point which you missed is the fact that the analysis of many has moved from the state to the person her self. The media and others have focused more on her, and in a perverted manner seem to be more interested in getting juicy details about HER to report to the masses. There is a 100+ post thread in LBN talking more about her personal business than the action of the state.... a thread that is entirely disappointing considering people at DU should have a better appreciation for reproductive privacy.

The fact that people are not primarily talking about the actions of the state demonstrates exactly what I am talking about. If people cared about her well being they would be focused on the state delaying her abortion. (after a certain time she will no longer be able to get one) Instead some seem to care more about making comments about her, which is exactly why her health is none of their business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Exactly, forget her personal stuff, keep focus on what FLA is doing
The problem is not the girl, but the fact that the State is interfering. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. like the Schiavo case
It was the same then. People attacked the husband, the parents. All of that was aside from the point. The only issue that concerns us is the actions of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon_da_brockman Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good post
Same as the Whole Terri Shiavo issue. No ones business. Pissed me off to know end when people who didnt even know her called her "Terri".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Or that it's Schiavo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon_da_brockman Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. woops my bad,
Though it proves my point. We dont know them, we dont know this girl, so its none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I feel sorry for the girl
and only wish that her wishes be respected. I do think it is wholely appropriate to question a government entity that didn't care enough to keep track of said teen but now wants to interfere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes it is important to question
the gov agency... but unfortunately the media and others are more interested in her personal details (and to make comments about them) rather than the actions of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. They should spend more time finding the person that impregnated her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. the girl should say the Judge is the father
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. it is too bad that neither LUCY HADI the old hag from the former HRS
(Health and REhabilitative Services) now serving jebush as person in charge of DCF Department of Children and Families; the judge handling the girl's case, jebush himself or any of those forcing her to carry the baby can or will experience having to carry a baby against their will and then giving birth to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. It is unfortunate that this girl cannot get an abortion
Since she is clearly mature enough to understand the issues.

Part of being pro-choice means speaking up when another's choice is curtailed. It really is that easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unions Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Absolutely
It's too bad others are more interested in gossiping about her rather than protecting her choice, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. More than protecting her choice
protecting HER. She's 13 for cripe's sake. Her risks for complications for herself are even higher than they would be if she was 50. She's at very real risk of permanent disability or death if forced to carry this fetus...and the fetus is at high risk for birth defects (especially neural tube defect) making it unadoptable if it is carried to term.

I've worked with pregnant teens. The younger they are, the more likely the sperm supplier is to have been an adult male in a position of authority over her. There's no outrage at that person. Hell, there doesn't even seem to be any effort to find him.

I'm outraged that this is coming down to being her 'fault'. Nobody seems to have even tried to find out WHY she ran away from the shelter, or did it so often.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Jeb Bush's email address:
is jeb.bush@myflorida.com

The issue is whether the state(government) or the mother has the right to decide. Let him know that it's a privacy decision to me made by the mother - regardless of her age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC