Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jimmy Carter's televised Energy Policy speech on April 18, 1977

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:07 AM
Original message
Jimmy Carter's televised Energy Policy speech on April 18, 1977
Reagan came into office and asked "what energy crisis?" and by executive order Carter's plan was rescinded. Oh,the wonderful world of Reaganomics..tax cuts for the rich, increased deficit spending and no energy plan. And now,Bush's energy policy consits of drilling in Alaska and giving tax breaks so people can buy expensive SUV's.


Here are two speeches that Carter delieved on energy while President.....just think where we would be now if his energy policy would have remained in place and through-out the years improved on.

Jimmy Carter delivered this televised speech on April 18, 1977.

Tonight I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history. With the exception of preventing war, this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes. The energy crisis has not yet overwhelmed us, but it will if we do not act quickly.

It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century.

We must not be selfish or timid if we hope to have a decent world for our children and grandchildren.

We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources. By acting now, we can control our future instead of letting the future control us.

Two days from now, I will present my energy proposals to the Congress. Its members will be my partners and they have already given me a great deal of valuable advice. Many of these proposals will be unpopular. Some will cause you to put up with inconveniences and to make sacrifices.

The most important thing about these proposals is that the alternative may be a national catastrophe. Further delay can affect our strength and our power as a nation.

Our decision about energy will test the character of the American people and the ability of the President and the Congress to govern. This difficult effort will be the "moral equivalent of war" -- except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not destroy.

.........

The first principle is that we can have an effective and comprehensive energy policy only if the government takes responsibility for it and if the people understand the seriousness of the challenge and are willing to make sacrifices.

The second principle is that healthy economic growth must continue. Only by saving energy can we maintain our standard of living and keep our people at work. An effective conservation program will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.

The third principle is that we must protect the environment. Our energy problems have the same cause as our environmental problems -- wasteful use of resources. Conservation helps us solve both at once.

The fourth principle is that we must reduce our vulnerability to potentially devastating embargoes. We can protect ourselves from uncertain supplies by reducing our demand for oil, making the most of our abundant resources such as coal, and developing a strategic petroleum reserve.

The fifth principle is that we must be fair. Our solutions must ask equal sacrifices from every region, every class of people, every interest group. Industry will have to do its part to conserve, just as the consumers will. The energy producers deserve fair treatment, but we will not let the oil companies profiteer.

The sixth principle, and the cornerstone of our policy, is to reduce the demand through conservation. Our emphasis on conservation is a clear difference between this plan and others which merely encouraged crash production efforts. Conservation is the quickest, cheapest, most practical source of energy. Conservation is the only way we can buy a barrel of oil for a few dollars. It costs about $13 to waste it.

The seventh principle is that prices should generally reflect the true replacement costs of energy. We are only cheating ourselves if we make energy artificially cheap and use more than we can really afford.

The eighth principle is that government policies must be predictable and certain. Both consumers and producers need policies they can count on so they can plan ahead. This is one reason I am working with the Congress to create a new Department of Energy, to replace more than 50 different agencies that now have some control over energy.

The ninth principle is that we must conserve the fuels that are scarcest and make the most of those that are more plentiful. We can't continue to use oil and gas for 75 percent of our consumption when they make up seven percent of our domestic reserves. We need to shift to plentiful coal while taking care to protect the environment, and to apply stricter safety standards to nuclear energy.

The tenth principle is that we must start now to develop the new, unconventional sources of energy we will rely on in the next century.



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/filmmore/ps_energy.html


and another speech by Carter...

Carter: The Crisis of Confidence July 15, 1979

I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, this Nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 - never. From now on, every new addition to our demand for energy will be met from our own production and our own conservation. The generation - long growth in our dependence on foreign oil will be stopped dead in its tracks right now and then reversed as we move through the 1980's, for I am tonight setting the further goal of cutting our dependence on foreign oil by one-half by the end of the next decade - a saving of over 4 1/2 million barrels of imported oil per day. Point two: To ensure that we meet these targets, I will use my Presidential authority to set import quotas. I'm announcing tonight that for 1979 and 1980,1 will forbid the entry into this country of one drop of foreign oil more than these goals allow. These quotas will ensure a reduction in imports even below the ambitious levels we set at the recent Tokyo summit...Moreover, I will soon submit legislation to Congress calling for the creation of this Nation's first solar bank, which will help us achieve the crucial goal of 20 percent of our energy coming from solar power by the year 2000.

http://www.tamu.edu/comm/pres/speeches/jccrisis.html

MP3 audio link of speech:
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/mp3clips/politicalspeeches/jimmycartercrisisofconfidence.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:09 AM
Original message
Wow...actual thought behind the speech and actual delineation of issues
What did we get last night?


blah blah blah...responsible energy...blah blah blah...$2 billion to research coal...blah blah blah...ANWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Carter looked to the future.
And still does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps someone who paid more attention to cars than I did can
tell me when the SUV craze really caught on, was it the 1980's? Such a stupid waste of time, we should be much further along with renewables and alternatives, and if I heard right, * wants to build new refineries? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I noticed it more in the mid 1990's.
In the 80's and early 90's I thought people were still into sports cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. The 80's were the mini-van years
for families. And some of them got pretty good mileage considering their size and all.


Clotaire Rapaille likes to take credit for getting people to buy what they don't need:

"In the kind of communication I'm developing and using, with 50 of the Fortune 100 companies who are my clients, almost full time, it is not enough to give a cortex message. "Buy my product because it's 10 percent cheaper": That's cortex. Well, if the other is 15 percent cheaper, I move to the others. You don't buy loyalty with percentages. That is key. It's not a question of numbers; it's the first reptilian reaction.

I want to give you an example. When I start working with Chrysler, they told me: "We have done all the research. We have all the questionnaires and focus groups and everything, and we know Americans don't want cars anymore. They want trucks; they want big SUVs; they want minivans. They don't want cars." And I told them, "I think that maybe you are making a mistake here, because you listen to what people say; I don't." So I suggested to Chrysler: "Let's do some kind of work the way I do this. Let's try to break the code, understand what is the code. What I believe is they are not buying cars because you're not delivering the reptilian car they want, but if you find out the reptilian code for car and you make a car, you create a car like that, you're going to sell it."

...Some people are getting there now. Some people understand the power of the reptilian in a very gutsy way. They don't do all the analysis of the three brains, but . For example, the Nextel campaign, "I do, therefore I am." Right, bingo. This is not "I think, therefore I am." And the campaign for the Hummer -- the Hummer is a car with a strong identity. It's a car in a uniform. I told them, put four stars on the shoulder of the Hummer, you will sell better. If you look at the campaign, brilliant. I have no credit for it, just so you know, but brilliant. They say, "You give us the money, we give you the car, nobody gets hurt." I love it! It's like the mafia speaking to you. For women, they say it's a new way to scare men. Wow. And women love the Hummer. They're not telling you, "Buy a Hummer because you get better gas mileage." You don't. This is cortex things. They address your reptilian brain.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/interviews/rapaille.html


more stories:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Clotaire+Rapaille%2C+suvs&btnG=Google+Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Makes me want to cry because he was so much smarter than we deserved
and he was replaced by a complete dipshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. really makes you think....
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itchinjim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. James E. Carter is one of the finest men this country has ever produced.
The continual smearing and ridiculing of him by the right is a measure of his greatness and should be worn as a badge of honor. Fuck Bush* and the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gawd damn....
Makes reagan and bush look like flaming IDIOTS!

Everybody needs to read these Prophetic words of President Carter's. Especially M$M.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Carter's words were not "prophetic," just plane comon sense.
Many people in our society were having conversations about the consequences of unbridled, non-renewable (particularly hydrocarbon) energy consumption and the long-range consequences of building a complex, global technological civilization dependent upon them. Anyone with an ounce of foresight could see we needed to think ahead.

What most of us did NOT understand at that time--and has become much clearer since then--is that the people who own the major oil companies are primarily fascists. And what fascists want is the increasing centralization of wealth and power in THEIR hands. You understand, the alternative renewable energy concept is a decentralizing concept; a democratizing concept. Most of us did not yet understand how threatening the idea of alternative/renewable energy was to the fascist oligarchy and their hegemony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. So key..
"The seventh principle is that prices should generally reflect the true replacement costs of energy. We are only cheating ourselves if we make energy artificially cheap and use more than we can really afford."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. If Carter had been president for the past 25 years the country would
be in great shape! That is if he could have overpowerd the Gas companies. It would have been as street fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. That's a great contribution
Thanks for finding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Done Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Carter was ahead of his time.
The world would be so much better off if we had continued his policies. In an age when even most democrats are on the payroll of corporations, Carter always did what he believed was best for the country, not what was best for his political career. I do believe he was the greatest president this country has ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Save The World Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. He's eligible for one more term
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Dlugokencky Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Jimmy Carter in 2008 ?
How old is he? He's still sharper than Reagan was when he was 30.



http://www.cafepress.com/kickindemocrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Save The World Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I've actually seen some websites promiting Carter in 2008
Sort of Draft-Jimmy sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Save The World Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Oh, and Carter will be 85 in 2004
Byrd will be 89 when he runs for another six year term in 2006 (if he runs).

Carter is still sharp as a tack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't totally trust Carter - please read.
His #10 (alternative energy) should have been #1. Reading this with the skeptical eye of one who thinks some dems are there to look good while losing elections or policy debates, this emphasis on conservation was doomed to fail. It should have been a Kennedy-like inspirational challenge to, by the end of a decade, become energy independent by alternative, renewable fuels. It should not be framed like the dreary burden of Frodo to march into Mordor to destroy the ring.

Let me point out something why I don't trust Carter. He is presently on the Baker-Carter Election Reform Commission, which was setup secretly by the likes of ACVR (a fraudulent GOP voting rights group, created recently with instant Gannon-like access to top republicans, please look up these bastards if you are not aware). The election reform Commission appears to be a whitewash of the 2004 election. The Commission is stacked with too many e-voting shills that are quite comfortable with having no paper to verify elections. The co-chair of the Commission is evil James A. Baker III, who supressed the votes in FL 2000. Many, many, many people have asked both the Executive Director, Robert Pastor, and the Co-Chair Jimmy Carter, to reject James Baker from the Commission. It's not happening. In the comments of someone at the Bradblog who wrote to Pastor and got a response back, Robert Pastor says:

"President Carter and I both believe that James Baker's leadership increases the chances that our hopes for reform will change policy."

What.The.Fuck ?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is sad that we did not stay on that path...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. It does my heart good to live to see this great big fat TOLD YOU SO
re the whole reagan era bullshit. Thank you for posting, this needs to be spread around the net like, well, netfire. I just made that up. I think.
And also, thanks for the MP3!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC