|
if you use their beliefs to show them how wrong they are.
Here’s one example:
Many Christians fervently believe that homosexuality is a behavioral disorder, and that people who commit homosexual acts are committing a grave sin. However, I point out that adultery (including re-marriage after divorce) carries the same scriptural penalty as homosexuality (Death by stoning). Since the punishment is the same, this tells me that the sins of divorce and remarriage are on par with that homosexuality. (They will reluctantly agree)
I ask the people who are fighting secular homosexual marriage if they are opposed to re-marriage after divorce? If not, why not? It is just as grave a sin. Should we prevent the state from allowing divorced people from re-marrying? Should the children of divorced parents be denied medical benefits? I tell them it is just that they prefer the sin of adultery over sin of homosexuality. They cannot come up with a logical response. We need to separate the religious aspects of marriage from the secular ones. “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s”. I don’t want the state to interfere with religion. Using the state to promote a religious view is the wrong approach.
You can quote them from Cal Thomas (not normally an ally!). This is excerpted from his 7/22/04 column, “When the foundations are being destroyed”:
“Neither the cultural problem nor its solution can be found in Washington. It lies in the decisions by millions of Americans … to construct their own moral authority. Sufficiently large numbers of Americans either do not believe, or do not practice, what the Scriptures teach and cannot be made to do so through a constitutional amendment or any other law. Neither side is going to persuade the other of the correctness of its position, so it becomes a political power game. … Paul the Apostle writes of what to expect during the "end times," … "There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God - having a form of godliness but denying its power." Having proclaimed his prophecy, Paul does not tell believers to embrace politics to influence or change the Roman government. Quite the contrary. He says, "Have nothing to do with them" (2 Timothy 3:1-5). To seek to implement such a code through human law is an exercise in futility and is neither expected nor mandated in that New Testament covenant. … The Bible is a book for those who would accept its message. Should anyone who does not believe it be expected to obey what it says? Given what the book quoted by some senators predicts, I wouldn't count on a "wicked and adulterous generation" rescuing itself through a marriage amendment or any other human effort.”
It takes a little effort and you need to do your homework, but it can work.
|