Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't W talk about the need for addressing the health care crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 07:55 AM
Original message
Didn't W talk about the need for addressing the health care crisis
during the election? Of course his response was generally malpractice reform.... but if I recall correctly, due to the resonance with the voting population to Kerry's emphasis on the issue - W responded with rhetoric that made it SOUND like it was an issue that HE was concerned about -and by extension would address.

So a scant four months in office and action and rhetoric (building to action to come in the fall) here is what we have:

Cut Medicaid!! "Fraud"!
Mind you - the feds already cut back medicaid after the 2001 tax giveaway to the rich. Many states had to attempt to take on the burden - as care providers cut backs (eg the reimbursement schedule to the doctor's office) required without states taking up the slack that many providers - citing financial hardship would cease to provide care to medicaid recipients. Result - even more red ink in states and some cutbacks, though not as steep as the cuts from the feds would have seen. So, says congress, lets cut it again - this time should do it - this time we should kick those kids off from getting medical care!!

Coming next.... Cut company paid health insurance.
Last night, Bushjr proclaimed that he was going to push for tax reform in the fall... in response to his "commission's report" that he claimed troubled him. Key point in that plan... Cut the tax incentives to companies that provide health insurance benefits. Now, what is that likely to result in, in a time where health costs are escalating and some companies are already cutting back of stopping providing care altogether? Yep, a likely huge swelling in the number of folks without health insurance.

Oh... did we forget to remind ourselves that the repubs in congress (doing Ws bidding) refused to include an exception in the bankruptcy bill for those bankruptcies caused by catastrophic medical expenses?

Folks - no one seems to be talking about this. We need to hold Ws election words up - right next to his and his party's actions on this. Sadly, our public has become so callous that simply declaring the cuts in medicaid as being anti-compassionate and potentially lethal to some, isn't going to get the public's attention. The right has tarred the word "entitlement" and just keeps parrotting it with this. Now - but it together with the actions in the bankruptcy bill and the intended action on "tax reform" that will likely end up with many folks who currently have insurance, losing it... and we get a two fer... wakes people up before the next push (in the fall) so that they clearly watch the behavior of those pushing to do this (and their misleading rhetoric), while bringing the WHOLE picture into view. Oh - and throw in the irony of Ms. Schaivo being kept alive due to medicaid dollars into the mix of the current story.

We are about to have a much greater health care crisis than we currently have - and no one seems to be talking about it. Can we change that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. IT was only rhetoric and only in response to Kerry
How many other things did he also say that he has or intends on doing nothing about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush's ownership society is class warfare pure and simple
His plan, according to Paul Krugman, will actually increase the number of uninsured. It goes right along with all his policies that comfort the already comfortable and further afflict the afflicted. There is a crisis coming, and the working and middle class are going to take a huge hit. With the bankruptcy bill in place, it's probably already too late to shake people out of complacency.

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2004/july/medical_class_warfar.php

Although the 2005 budget presents that new deduction under the heading ”Helping the uninsured,” health savings accounts don’t seem to have much to do with the needs of the families likely to find themselves without health insurance. For one thing, such families need more protection than a plan with a $2,000 deductible provides. Furthermore, the tax advantages of health savings accounts would be small for those families most at risk of losing health insurance, who are overwhelmingly in low tax brackets.

But for people whose income puts them in high tax brackets, these accounts are a very good deal; making the premiums deductible turns them into a great deal. In other words, health savings accounts will offer the already affluent, who don’t have problems getting health insurance, yet another tax shelter. Meanwhile, health savings accounts, in the view of many experts, will actually increase the number of uninsured.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here in Missouri we passed Malpractice reform
And my visits are soo much cheaper.....:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC