Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CWA Supports SBC-AT&T merger (press release)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AmericanErrorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 11:19 PM
Original message
CWA Supports SBC-AT&T merger (press release)
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 11:21 PM by AmericanErrorist
SBC-AT&T Merger Merits Quick Approval, CWA Tells FCC
Washington, D.C. -- The proposed merger of AT&T Corp. and SBC Communications will result in a financially stable, global leader in telecommunications and should be approved quickly, the Communications Workers of America stated in a filing to the Federal Communications Commission.

The merger is clearly in the public interest, CWA said, noting that it will create a "premier U.S. communications company," one with the ability to expand the delivery of advanced technologies, services and features to all classes of customers.

This merger will "create a company with the resources and end-to-end network essential in the deployment of advanced next-generation Internet-Protocol enabled networks and services," CWA said.

The merger makes certain that national security will be safeguarded, by ensuring that AT&T, "on which the government heavily depends for national security and other needs, will be a strong American company," CWA continued.

The merger also passes other key tests. It will enhance, not reduce, competition by combining the different strengths of the two merger partners – AT&T's global network and research innovation and SBC's financial strength and local exchange, broadband and wireless capabilities, the CWA filing noted.

The merger also will provide employees at both companies with "the opportunity to share in the growth of the merged entity rather than the job loss that has been the fate of all too many AT&T employees in recent years," CWA said. "CWA is fully confident that SBC's progressive human resource policies and strong labor-management partnership that have resulted in a highly-skilled career workforce providing world-class service to SBC customers will continue at the merged SBC-AT&T."

http://www.cwa-union.org/news/PressReleaseDisplay.asp?ID=497
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope the CWA isn't going along with this to protect their own fiefdom.
Sometimes being a union member can be so infuriating.

So one of the children eats the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. The CWA is full of shit
It's going to cost them a lot of jobs. Every merger costs thousands of jobs, and destroys competition. These companies were all broken up from monopoly status back in the 1970's under a Republican Attorney General, William Saxbe, but in the last 10-15 years they're all coming back again. SBC merged with Ameritech a few years ago, and service plunged, and rates went up.

Same thing with the oil companies. They broke up Standard Oil years ago, but all the companies are re-merging now, eliminating competition, and gas prices are soaring again. They've been closing down refineries in the US for 15 years, and they now complain that we don't have enough capacity.

And now the union is selling out it's membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC