Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Bush Wants You to Pay Your Debts (Though He Never Paid His)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:12 PM
Original message
George Bush Wants You to Pay Your Debts (Though He Never Paid His)
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 03:54 PM by Stephanie



If you're George Bush you don't pay off your debts - you bail out, and make a profit on the deal to boot.


__________________




US President George W. Bush speaks before signing the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 in the Old Executive Office Building in Washington.(AFP/Brendan Smialowski)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050420/photos_pl_afp/050420204243_i308h64o_photo0

__________________

Bush's remarks today:


Our bankruptcy laws are an important part of the safety net of America. They give those who cannot pay their debts a fresh start. Yet bankruptcy should always be a last resort in our legal system. If someone does not pay his or her debts, the rest of society ends up paying them. In recent years, too many people have abused the bankruptcy laws. They've walked away from debts even when they had the ability to repay them. This has made credit less affordable and less accessible, especially for low-income workers who already face financial obstacles.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/04/20050420-5.html

__________________


http://www.publicintegrity.org/bop2004/candidate.aspx?cid=1

Before going into business, however, Bush took a quick detour into politics. In 1978, he ran for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Bush lost the election, but he won the confidence of relatives and family friends who agreed to support Arbusto, his oil-exploration firm. From 1979 to 1983, dozens of investors poured millions into the company and its successor, Bush Exploration. Unfortunately for the investors Arbusto, however, turned out to be a financial failure. By April 1984, the company was $3.1 million in debt.

In 1984, Bush sold his business to another Texas oil and gas exploration firm, Spectrum 7. As part of the deal, Bush became Spectrum 7's chief executive officer. But once again, business success eluded Bush and those around him. Two years after the merger, in 1986, world oil prices, whose decline had hurt many Texas oil producers, plunged even further. Spectrum 7, deeply in debt, was in need of a bailout. Bush found one.

In 1986 Harken Oil & Gas, an oil exploration company based in Irving, Texas, bought Spectrum 7. For his part Bush earned $600,000 from the initial sale. He also became a director and was paid as much as $120,000 in annual consulting fees and received stock warrants worth $131,250 even though he spent much of 1987 and 1988 working on his father's presidential campaign.

__________________


http://www.columbusalive.com/2002/20020829/082902/08290208.html

In the mid 1980s, Arbusto hit hard times and merged with another desperate oil company to form Spectrum 7 Energy Corporation. Harken Energy Corporation, called by Time magazine “one of the most mysterious and eccentric outfits ever to drill for oil,” rescued Dubya’s failing enterprise in a stock swap with Spectrum 7 in 1986. Dubya received nearly $600,000 worth of Harken stock, joined its board of directors and became a $120,000-a-year “consultant” for Harken. The next year, Harken stayed afloat through debt restructuring and was in the same sad financial shape as the earlier Spectrum 7 and Arbusto.

But Harken dramatically reversed its ill fortune in January 1990. As Truell and Gurwin explain, “Harken Energy was awarded one of the most coveted oil deals in the world: a concession to drill for crude oil off the coast of Bahrain. The decision stunned many people in the industry. Harken was not only a small firm, it had never drilled outside the United States, nor had it drilled offshore. The only explanation that made sense to many oil executives, was that the Bahrain government wanted to do a favor for the family of President Bush.”

***

Harken’s Bahrain deal sharply drove up the price of the company’s stock. By June 1990, Dubya had bailed and sold two-thirds of his Harken shares—a transaction he improperly failed to disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission for several months. Dubya made $318,430 in profit on the sale. In August, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Harken stock fell by 25 percent, from $4 to $3 a share.

Harken creditors were threatening to foreclose unless debt payments were made, according to U.S. News and World Report. “Substantial evidence to suggest that Bush knew Harken was in dire straits,” the magazine reported. Under U.S. law, insiders like Dubya are required to publicly report when they liquidate large blocks of stock. Bush reported his Harken stock sale eight months after the federal deadline, according to the Wall Street Journal.

__________________


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sick of corporations run into the ground by CEOs
who lead a company into bankruptcy, escape with their golden parachutes, leave the workers to be laid off, stockholders broke and then the courts wipe the slate clean.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. "If someone does not pay his or her debts,
the rest of society ends up paying them."

Oh, oops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! You are ruining the moment.
You think any in the press will bring this up again at the next conference or is it "old news"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Consumer Protection Act of 2005
Why is everyone so upset? Don't yuou see they're trying to protect us consumers? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Reminds me of "Freedom Fries"
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention"
They are especially fond of the word "abuse" lately. Big campaign recently re: "lawsuit abuse." I'm sure they have somebody on staff full-time just analyzing the psychological impact of the language they use. Who supports "abuse"? Abuse is a bad thing! They've co-opted the language of battered women and applied it to Citibank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They got the propaganda phraseology thing down.
No Child Left Behind - how could anyone oppose this? Leaving children behind?

Culture of Life - everyone else is part of the "death culture" by definition?

There are probably lots more, but those two sprang to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Strengthening Social Security"
Sounds like a good thing. Until you realize when they say strengthen they mean destroy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_true_leroy Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. so how's this 'sposed to help??
"This has made credit less affordable and less accessible, especially for low-income workers who already face financial obstacles."

So this bill really is for low incomers, to help the working class? I didn't get it until now. So I guess we'll see credit card interest rates down to about 5% or so? Right? And not being able to declare bankruptcy will help them face their 'financial obstacles'? Hellllooooooooo...... anybody?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Les BOOGIE Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. No big deal, small potatoes compared to >>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, well, Neil
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 04:14 PM by Stephanie


He's the family genius! From your link:

______

In 1990, Bush paid a $50,000 fine and was banned from banking activities for his role in taking down Silverado, which actually cost taxpayers $1.3 billion. A Resolution Trust Corporation Suit against Bush and other officers of Silverado was settled in 1991 for $26.5 million. And the fine wasn't exactly paid by Neil Bush. A Republican fundraiser set up a fund to help defer costs Neil incurred in his S&L dealings. Friends and relatives contributed -- but not then-President and Barbara Bush, which would have been unseemly. Since then, the Bush political combine has done such a remarkable job keeping Neil in the background that what seemed like a 10-year news blackout didn't end until mid-February, when the Austin Business Journal reported that Bush "quietly is heading a local start-up that's raising at least $10 million in second-round funding." According to the business newsweekly, Bush has already raised $7.1 million from 53 investors underwriting Ignite! Inc., an educational software company. After being banned from banking and all but airbrushed out of the family portrait -- or at least the family news profile -- Neil Bush is back.

Bush wasn't just an average S&L exec drawing a big salary and recklessly pushing a federally insured institution beyond its lending limits. As a director of a failing thrift in Denver, Bush voted to approve $100 million in what were ultimately bad loans to two of his business partners. And in voting for the loans, he failed to inform fellow board members at Silverado Savings & Loan that the loan applicants were his business partners. Federal banking regulators later followed the trail of defaulted loans to Neil Bush oil ventures, in particular JNB International, an oil and gas exploration company awarded drilling concessions in Argentina -- despite its complete lack of experience in international oil and gas drilling. It probably helped that the Bush family had cultivated close ties with the fabulously corrupt Carlos Menem, former president of Argentina.

__________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC