Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The nomination is very troubled, very troubled,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:09 PM
Original message
"The nomination is very troubled, very troubled,"

But then so is the nominator, so don't get your hopes up.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/20/politics/20cnd-bolton.html?pagewanted=print&position=



"The nomination is very troubled, very troubled," said Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia. But he said he thought President Bush was unlikely to withdraw it, lest he face the wrath of Mr. Bolton's conservative supporters. "They would be pummeled from the right," he said.

Constance Horner, who was White House director of presidential personnel under the first President Bush, agreed that this president would stand firm.

"Under a president other than this one, I would've said it's only a matter of time," she said. "But I have to tell you this president is a very determined man. My expectation is that President Bush, as he did with the Iraq war, will see it through, and emerge on the other side of this hostile criticism with his nominee confirmed."

Nonetheless, the nomination has become Mr. Bush's most embattled since he named Bernard Kerik to head the Homeland Security Department. Mr. Kerik, a former New York City police commissioner, withdrew his name in December amid a torrent of allegations about his past business and personal conduct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I still think he'll slip in eventually
although the fight so far has made me optimistic. But I do think gw is willing to put a lot on the line for it.

Keep up the good fight, Dems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. The word Determined is not appropriate here.That would mean he has thought
through this man's qualifications and fitness for the job, a not plausible scenario.More likely, he has been told to stand firm by his handlers.In his world,looking like Winston Churchill without the courage is all that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes. Obstinate is a more appropriate word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC